I’ve moderated a couple small-medium forums (2k-8k) members as well as
participated in many online.
I am in favor of moving to a forum system for a lot of reasons. I’d be
curious who would be the community manager(s) (not moderators per se) and
if the tone would be similar to the docs and wiki or
That is correct. It is deprecated now (2.2) and will stop working in 3.1.
More info is available at
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/internals/deprecation/
Lee
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 7:24 AM sajjad Hassanzadeh
wrote:
> in https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/2.2/topics/db/aggregation/ PART
e
> for the sane default...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Malcolm
>
> On 2 August 2016 at 14:01, Lee Trout > wrote:
>
>> I know there's always resistance to adding more settings but this seems
>> like a candidate for a value in a setting with a sane default that a us
I know there's always resistance to adding more settings but this seems
like a candidate for a value in a setting with a sane default that a user
could quickly and easily change.
On Tuesday, August 2, 2016, James Pic wrote:
> Thanks for your reply Aymeric. If I understand correctly the best way
I have an omnigraffle license and could help a bit later this week if no
one else is interested.
I'm out of touch with Django lately... I read the DEP and I'm assuming
you're after an updated graphic to explicitly show the behavior of proper
short circuiting and the better guarantees around what i
I don't want to add any noise here- but I just had a chance to glance over
this conversation and I've basically been doing what Carl describes with
Angular. (In fact I joke often about calling it Djangular). I have a view
that prerenders angular templates (accepts the path to the template in the
ur
Hey gang,
I finally got past 1.5 and I'm finding so many nice features in 1.7. Thanks
to everyone!
To my surprise logging had an overhaul from #21714 [0] and I found the
documentation a bit confusing / lacking of details.
Theres an explanation of merging settings in
https://docs.djangoproject.co
Looking at it objectively I'm on the fence. Angular's $http is easily
configurable at the provider level and I feel like the onus is on any
front-end tool to be flexible enough to work with different servers. At the
same time if I needed the same code to talk to Django, Flask, and Node then
I would
Let me clarify that I would expect both qs[:1][0] and qs[0] to raise
IndexError if there were no results.
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Lee Trout wrote:
> That's what I thought- But why not just qs[0]?
>
> Doesn't qs[:1] and qs[0] both cause a LIMIT 1 on the query? It s
d loads every single model in the
> queryset into Python, potentially the whole database!
> On May 15, 2013 9:24 PM, "Lee Trout" wrote:
>
>> Is qs[:1][0] better form than list(qs)[0]?
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Selwin Ong wrote:
>
Is qs[:1][0] better form than list(qs)[0]?
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Selwin Ong wrote:
> I've updated the first() and last() to not accept any arguments. Please
> review it and let me know if there's anything else I need to change.
> Hopefully this can get merged in during the sprints an
+1 for logging. It took me way too long to figure out how to get everything
working properly using a different (builtin) class. I agree with #19395
that an example (or two) would be great.
Here's what I'm currently using which makes use of a rotating file handler
and a custom date formatter (If it
Hi all,
I wasn't sure if it was best to open a ticket or post to the dev group so
here I am...
I was curious what others thought about changing the default error in the
PasswordResetForm which currently displays "That e-mail address doesn't
have an associated user account. Are you sure you've
13 matches
Mail list logo