So, I asked my webhosting provider and he replied that he uses mod_cgi.
Is it possible to use that with Django too somehow?
Regards,
L.
"""
It seems to me that the original question here is based on a
misunderstanding;
"""
James, you made a good point.
So, when we rate it (1 best):
1 FCGI
2 mod_python
3 SCGI ?
4 Twisted
X runserver (development only)
X+1 CGI (probably performance worse than runserver)
Is it OK
On 11/14/05, Radek Svarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe that PythonistL did not asked about running it on CGI. He asked to
> run it on the shared webhosting. And noted some issues.
Django runs perfectly well on shared hosting. Plenty of hosts out
there offer Python/FCGI which is
# I believe that PythonistL did not asked about running it on CGI. He
# asked to run it on the shared webhosting. And noted some issues.
Right: he didn't ask about running it on CGI; it was just stated that
running it on CGI is his only option, and it's such a nasty one that
he ought to consider
I believe that PythonistL did not asked about running it on CGI. He
asked to run it on the shared webhosting. And noted some issues.
There is no reason to think about using CGI at all as many of you noted.
I believe that there is / will be shared webhosting with mod_python /
fastcgi support. (At
> ( I guess that from this:
>If a Python programmer has a good webhosting ( = share webhosting)
>company, he is happy with, why he should find another one only to
>install Django?)
Because he wouldn't be anymore happy with his webhosting, if he is
forced to run Django under CGI, as that is dead
Yes, I agree with Radek.
For a wide spreading of Django,
a support for share webhosting ,will be very, very important.
( I guess that from this:
If a Python programmer has a good webhosting ( = share webhosting)
company, he is happy with, why he should find another one only to
install Django?)
# Simon, you are saying that FastCGI serves worse than mod_python?
He said "CGI", which is not the same as FastCGI.
--
Jonathan Daugherty
http://www.parsed.org
On 14 Nov 2005, at 16:24, PythonistL wrote:
So, would it be possible to make the installation easier also for
those who use share webhosting ?
Maybe we should document Django-as-CGI, horrible though the
performance will be. We can have a big performance disclaimer
recommending this as
Hi,
I have been playing with Django for some time and I really like it.
Very few lines of code can make great things.
However, what seems to me as a big limit in Django using is a quite
difficult installation.
Here it is what I mean:
I use a share webhosting, (http://www.imhosted.com). I have
10 matches
Mail list logo
