Hey Yuri,
I'm sorry but I don't understand your question. Could you please explain it a
little more?
Thanks,
Arthur
On Aug 23, 2010, at 5:47 AM, burc...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi Arthur,
>
> thanks for your work!
>
> Is any syntax of setting keywords for app instances in INSTALLED_APPS
> or some
Hi Arthur,
thanks for your work!
Is any syntax of setting keywords for app instances in INSTALLED_APPS
or somewhere in settings supported now?
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 2:06 AM, Arthur Koziel wrote:
> Hey there,
>
> the GSOC is over and I wanted to give you all a final status report.
>
> The AppC
Hey there,
the GSOC is over and I wanted to give you all a final status report.
The AppCache was refactored and now creates app instances instead of just
loading models. An app is either an instance of django.core.apps.App or a
custom class. This depends on the entry in the INSTALLED_APPS setti
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Arthur Koziel wrote:
> 4. Also in the same changeset, the 'nesting_level' and 'can_postpone'
> variables were introduced. These fixed a problem where the package is still
> being imported by Python and the model module isn't available yet. Again, I
> couldn't repr
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Arthur Koziel wrote:
> Hey there,
>
> I'm making some progress on the app loading gsoc project. I'm still in the
> process of writing tests for the AppCache. It took me longer than I've
> thought. However, I'm really confident that I'll finish the testing stuff
Hey there,
I'm making some progress on the app loading gsoc project. I'm still in the
process of writing tests for the AppCache. It took me longer than I've thought.
However, I'm really confident that I'll finish the testing stuff this week and
move on to writing the new App class. There are st
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Jannis Leidel wrote:
>
> Am 07.04.2010 um 13:40 schrieb Russell Keith-Magee:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 5:35 AM, Arthur Koziel
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I’m going to apply for GSoC with the goal of refactoring the app loading
>>> [0]. I’ve been looking at Django’s c
Thanks for the brilliant advice. I will do so and am now. :)
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 6:09 PM, burc...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Dagvadorj Galbadrakh
> wrote:
>> Thanks for review.
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:15 PM, burc...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> May I have few quest
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Dagvadorj Galbadrakh
wrote:
> Thanks for review.
>
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:15 PM, burc...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> May I have few questions.
>> 1) And what if foo.gsoc has taiwan submodule already?
>
> There will be certain conventions on which names not to use as
Thanks for review.
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:15 PM, burc...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> May I have few questions.
> 1) And what if foo.gsoc has taiwan submodule already?
There will be certain conventions on which names not to use as an
instance name such as, views, models, etc. Plus, Django can check if
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Dagvadorj Galbadrakh
wrote:
> Good idea. Let INSTALLED_APPS be iterable, and let Django deployment
> do its job based on the configuration. Little to say though:
>
> INSTALLED_APPS = (
> 'django.contrib.auth',
> 'django.contrib.contenttypes',
> 'django.cont
Good idea. Let INSTALLED_APPS be iterable, and let Django deployment
do its job based on the configuration. Little to say though:
INSTALLED_APPS = (
'django.contrib.auth',
'django.contrib.contenttypes',
'django.contrib.sessions',
'django.contrib.sites',
'django.contrib.admin',
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Dagvadorj Galbadrakh
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> If you're going to tackle this problem, I'd
>> rather see you concentrate on issues like:
>>
>> * Translating application names
>> * Solving the "two applications called
On Apr 7, 2010, at 1:40 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> I agree with Alex - there's a lot more detail needed here. How will I
> get access to the App instance that a model belongs to? How will
> legacy attributes like db_prefix be proxied? What is the order of
> precedence when a model and an app
Am 07.04.2010 um 13:40 schrieb Russell Keith-Magee:
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 5:35 AM, Arthur Koziel wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I’m going to apply for GSoC with the goal of refactoring the app loading
>> [0]. I’ve been looking at Django’s current app loading implementation
>> (db.models.loading), Vinay Saj
On Apr 7, 2010, at 1:40 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 5:35 AM, Arthur Koziel wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I’m going to apply for GSoC with the goal of refactoring the app loading
>> [0]. I’ve been looking at Django’s current app loading implementation
>> (db.models.loading), Vinay
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> If you're going to tackle this problem, I'd
> rather see you concentrate on issues like:
>
> * Translating application names
> * Solving the "two applications called auth" problem
> * Providing configurability for db-level naming conv
On Apr 7, 2:18 pm, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>
> It's fair to assume that there will always be *some* details that are
> worked out as part of the GSoC work. My intention isn't to try and
> nail down all the details before the project starts - it's to try and
> work out how much Arthur has thoug
>>> For the record - I don't think the "multiple versions of a single app"
>>> problem is one worth solving. I'm not even convinced it can be solved
>>> at all, for all the reasons Florian identified, and then some.
>>
>> I agree, but IIRC it was quoted as one reason why this feature was
>> left o
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
>
> On Apr 7, 12:40 pm, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>>
>> I agree with Alex - there's a lot more detail needed here. How will I
>> get access to the App instance that a model belongs to? How will
>> legacy attributes like db_prefix be proxied? W
On Apr 7, 12:40 pm, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
>
> Strings will be converted to App()... by What? When?
>
This is already done by the #3591 patch, in
django.db.models.loading.py.
> What happens to existing code that is using "for app in INSTALLED_APS"
> as an idiom?
>
The #3591 patch does this
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 5:35 AM, Arthur Koziel wrote:
> Hi,
> I’m going to apply for GSoC with the goal of refactoring the app loading
> [0]. I’ve been looking at Django’s current app loading implementation
> (db.models.loading), Vinay Sajip’s patch in #3591 [1] and the notes on the
> InstalledApps
I don't have much to say, as Alex pretty much covered it; but that's
the list:
* Assume an app1 which requires another app2 (and has some
ForeignKeys to it). Currently that's easy; just import the model and
ForeignKey it. How would those imports look like in your case (eg to
which models would ap
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Arthur Koziel wrote:
> Hi,
> I’m going to apply for GSoC with the goal of refactoring the app loading
> [0]. I’ve been looking at Django’s current app loading implementation
> (db.models.loading), Vinay Sajip’s patch in #3591 [1] and the notes on the
> InstalledApps
Hi,
I’m going to apply for GSoC with the goal of refactoring the app loading [0].
I’ve been looking at Django’s current app loading implementation
(db.models.loading), Vinay Sajip’s patch in #3591 [1] and the notes on the
InstalledAppsRevision wiki page [2]. Here's what I'm planning to change.
25 matches
Mail list logo
