Re: GitHub migration done!

2012-05-12 Thread Vinay Sajip
Hi Charles, > I setup a new mirror using hg-git: > >  https://bitbucket.org/django/django-hg-git > > I work for Bitbucket and I'll make sure the mirror is maintained. Thanks very much for doing this. Regards, Vinay Sajip -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gr

Re: GitHub migration done!

2012-05-11 Thread Charles McLaughlin
On Apr 30, 6:19 pm, Carl Meyer wrote: > Hi Vinay, > > On 04/30/2012 07:11 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote: > > > On Apr 28, 4:08 am, Adrian Holovaty  wrote: > > >> * We're going to keep the Subversion repository around indefinitely, > >> but it'll no longer be updated. > > > That means that any mirrors usin

Re: GitHub migration done!

2012-05-03 Thread Vinay Sajip
On May 1, 5:39 pm, Carl Meyer wrote: > It's just a cron job and a local repo using hgsubversion; every five > minutes it pulls the latest from Subversion and pushes it to Bitbucket. > The repo and cron job are hosted on the djangoproject.com server. If you > are able to get the conversion from gi

Re: GitHub migration done!

2012-05-02 Thread Carl Meyer
On 05/02/2012 10:09 AM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] wrote: Apologies if this question has already been answered or seems silly but - is there a reason Mercurial is needed?? Can contributors not just switch to using git? i.e. if we have deprecated SVN, then why isn't Mercurial also being d

Re: GitHub migration done!

2012-05-02 Thread Vinay Sajip
On May 1, 5:39 pm, Carl Meyer wrote: > It's just a cron job and a local repo using hgsubversion; every five > minutes it pulls the latest from Subversion and pushes it to Bitbucket. > The repo and cron job are hosted on the djangoproject.com server. If you > are able to get the conversion from g

Re: GitHub migration done!

2012-05-02 Thread Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]
Apologies if this question has already been answered or seems silly but - is there a reason Mercurial is needed?? Can contributors not just switch to using git? i.e. if we have deprecated SVN, then why isn't Mercurial also being deprecated?? Cal On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Florian Apolloner

Re: GitHub migration done!

2012-05-02 Thread Florian Apolloner
On Wednesday, May 2, 2012 3:37:07 PM UTC+2, Florian Apolloner wrote: > > Far from easy, last time (or actually times) I tried to use it it broke in > many horrible ways :( [And either the link isn't listing an up2date project > or it's really dead since 3 years] > Ignore the dead status, I had

Re: GitHub migration done!

2012-05-02 Thread Florian Apolloner
On Tuesday, May 1, 2012 6:40:53 PM UTC+2, dstufft wrote: > > Pretty sure this isn't going to make a compatible with the existing > mirror > mirror but http://hg-git.github.com/ should make it easy to go from git > -> hg. > Far from easy, last time (or actually times) I tried to use it it broke

Re: GitHub migration done!

2012-05-01 Thread Donald Stufft
Pretty sure this isn't going to make a compatible with the existing mirror mirror but http://hg-git.github.com/ should make it easy to go from git -> hg. On Tuesday, May 1, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Carl Meyer wrote: > On 05/01/2012 12:45 AM, Vinay Sajip wrote: > > On May 1, 2:19 am, Carl Meyerhttp://o

Re: GitHub migration done!

2012-05-01 Thread Carl Meyer
On 05/01/2012 12:45 AM, Vinay Sajip wrote: On May 1, 2:19 am, Carl Meyer wrote: Good point. I think which of those happens now depends on whether a motivated someone steps up to figure out how to convert the mirror to use hg-git and source from Git, and then maintain it as needed. I originally

Re: GitHub migration done!

2012-05-01 Thread Carsten Fuchs
Hi all, On Saturday, April 28, 2012 5:08:09 AM UTC+2, Adrian Holovaty wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Adrian Holovaty wrote: > > We're going to do the migration to GitHub today. This means we'll no > > longer be committing code to our Subversion repository. Committers, > > please h

Re: GitHub migration done!

2012-04-30 Thread Vinay Sajip
On May 1, 2:19 am, Carl Meyer wrote: > > Good point. I think which of those happens now depends on whether a > motivated someone steps up to figure out how to convert the mirror to > use hg-git and source from Git, and then maintain it as needed. I > originally did the current mirror, and it real

Re: GitHub migration done!

2012-04-30 Thread Carl Meyer
Hi Vinay, On 04/30/2012 07:11 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote: On Apr 28, 4:08 am, Adrian Holovaty wrote: * We're going to keep the Subversion repository around indefinitely, but it'll no longer be updated. That means that any mirrors using that repository as a source are also not worth using any mor

Re: GitHub migration done!

2012-04-30 Thread Vinay Sajip
On Apr 28, 4:08 am, Adrian Holovaty wrote: > * We're going to keep the Subversion repository around indefinitely, > but it'll no longer be updated. That means that any mirrors using that repository as a source are also not worth using any more. There's the official BitBucket Mercurial mirror of

Re: GitHub migration done!

2012-04-30 Thread Daniel Sokolowski
Adrian, excellent job and thank you! Curious what five open-source on Subversion you are referring to? -Original Message- From: Adrian Holovaty Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 11:08 PM To: django-developers@googlegroups.com Subject: GitHub migration done! On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:50

Re: GitHub migration done!

2012-04-28 Thread ptone
On Saturday, April 28, 2012 12:46:53 PM UTC-7, Yuval Adam wrote: > > I think this issue should be dealt with sooner rather than later. > > Django will start getting lots of orphan pull requests with no > matching trac ticket, and a policy of how community members should > contribute via github

Re: GitHub migration done!

2012-04-28 Thread charettes
I wrote a little userscript that linkifies ticket numbers in github pull request to the correct trac ticket. It can be found here . Le vendredi 27 avril 2012 23:08:09 UTC-4, Adrian Holovaty a écrit : > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Adrian Holovaty > wrote

Re: GitHub migration done!

2012-04-28 Thread Adrian Holovaty
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Adrian Holovaty wrote: > OK, it's live! > > https://github.com/django/django Hi all, I've written a post-mortem here, for anybody interested in how the process went: http://www.holovaty.com/writing/django-github/ Adrian -- You received this message because y

Re: GitHub migration done!

2012-04-28 Thread Yuval Adam
Hey Aymeric, Just throwing in my 2 cents. If there's a public thread I can follow re: this issue, I'd appreciate a link, since I haven't been able to find it. Waiting patiently :) - Yuval On Apr 29, 12:36 am, Aymeric Augustin wrote: > On 28 avr. 2012, at 21:46, Yuval Adam wrote: > > > I think t

Re: GitHub migration done!

2012-04-28 Thread Aymeric Augustin
On 28 avr. 2012, at 21:46, Yuval Adam wrote: > I think this issue should be dealt with sooner rather than later. > > Django will start getting lots of orphan pull requests with no > matching trac ticket, and a policy of how community members should > contribute via github should be in place. > >

Re: GitHub migration done!

2012-04-28 Thread Yuval Adam
I think this issue should be dealt with sooner rather than later. Django will start getting lots of orphan pull requests with no matching trac ticket, and a policy of how community members should contribute via github should be in place. As a side note, it is kind of a hassle to submit a pull req

Re: GitHub migration done!

2012-04-28 Thread Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]
Amazing news!! Great job, Adrian. Cal On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Adrian Holovaty wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Adrian Holovaty > wrote: > > We're going to do the migration to GitHub today. This means we'll no > > longer be committing code to our Subversion repository. Committ

Re: GitHub migration done!

2012-04-28 Thread Mateusz Harasymczuk
Could you make tags out of stable releases. It would help a lot :} -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/django-developers/-/NzF2b8Xl9wUJ. To post to this g

Re: GitHub migration done!

2012-04-28 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
On Saturday, April 28, 2012 at 5:17 AM, slav0nic wrote: > what about "Browse Source", trac links to changset, CommitTicketUpdater ? > Maybe this will be possible only if you syncing github to local copy via > pulling. Yup, I'm working on that. I didn't get it done yesterday, but didn't want to bl

Re: GitHub migration done!

2012-04-28 Thread Mateusz Harasymczuk
On Saturday, April 28, 2012 5:08:09 AM UTC+2, Adrian Holovaty wrote: > > OK, it's live! > https://github.com/django/django > Great news! Therefore probably you should update this site: https://www.djangoproject.com/download/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog

Re: GitHub migration done!

2012-04-28 Thread Sean Lee
Great job! 在 2012年4月28日星期六UTC+8上午11时08分09秒，Adrian Holovaty写道： > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Adrian Holovaty > wrote: > > We're going to do the migration to GitHub today. This means we'll no > > longer be committing code to our Subversion repository. Committers, > > please hold off on

Re: GitHub migration done!

2012-04-28 Thread slav0nic
what about "Browse Source", trac links to changset, CommitTicketUpdater ? Maybe this will be possible only if you syncing github to local copy via pulling. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To view this discussion on the web

Re: GitHub migration done!

2012-04-28 Thread Vitaly Babiy
Awesome job guys! Vitaly Babiy On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Camilo Nova wrote: > Great Job. This will make easier for a lot of people to be involved on the > project. > > > On Friday, April 27, 2012 10:08:09 PM UTC-5, Adrian Holovaty wrote: >> >> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Adrian H

Re: GitHub migration done!

2012-04-28 Thread Camilo Nova
Great Job. This will make easier for a lot of people to be involved on the project. On Friday, April 27, 2012 10:08:09 PM UTC-5, Adrian Holovaty wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Adrian Holovaty > wrote: > > We're going to do the migration to GitHub today. This means we'll no > > l

Re: GitHub migration done!

2012-04-28 Thread Dana Woodman
Congrats Adrian, this is very exciting news! I'm excited to see Django taking the next leap forward, exciting times ahead! Cheers! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.goo

Re: GitHub migration done!

2012-04-28 Thread Aymeric Augustin
On 28 avr. 2012, at 05:08, Adrian Holovaty wrote: > * We're going to keep using Trac for tickets, but pull requests on > GitHub are also welcome. Hi everyone, For extra safety, I recommend you still create Trac tickets for each suggested change, until we work out how pull requests integrate int

Re: GitHub migration done!

2012-04-27 Thread Justin Holmes
Adrian, Thank you. Well done. Awesome. :-) On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Adrian Holovaty wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Adrian Holovaty wrote: >> We're going to do the migration to GitHub today. This means we'll no >> longer be committing code to our Subversion repository. Co

GitHub migration done!

2012-04-27 Thread Adrian Holovaty
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Adrian Holovaty wrote: > We're going to do the migration to GitHub today. This means we'll no > longer be committing code to our Subversion repository. Committers, > please hold off on making commits until the migration is done. OK, it's live! https://github.com