On Apr 17, 5:38 pm, Carl Meyer wrote:
> Since it seems that the additional test-suite runtime from the new
> default password hasher is enough to be a blocker for migrations to 1.4
> in some cases, I've opened a ticket for documenting this
> workaround:https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/18157
Since it seems that the additional test-suite runtime from the new
default password hasher is enough to be a blocker for migrations to 1.4
in some cases, I've opened a ticket for documenting this workaround:
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/18157
Carl
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP dig
Thanks man!
PASSWORD_HASHERS = ('django.contrib.auth.hashers.MD5PasswordHasher',)
in test_settings.py made tests of our project 2x faster (I was not
upgrading from 1.3).
понедельник, 16 апреля 2012 г., 20:33:31 UTC+6 пользователь Dan Fairs
написал:
>
> Hi,
>
> Both of these were fixed by using
My project has about half as many tests but boy did the run slowly on my
Django 1.4 upgrade branch.
On Monday, 16 April 2012 15:33:31 UTC+1, Dan Fairs wrote:
>
>
> The first big regression for us was that our test suite took 20% longer to
> run. I traced this down to the new default password has
Hi,
>> Both of these were fixed by using the new implementations from Django
>> itself, and re-applying our small changes.
>>
>> Should I raise backwards-incompatibility tickets for these? They're pretty
>> obscure, and I can't imagine many people are doing them. I raised #17891
>> because the co
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Dan Fairs wrote:
> - We have a custom template tag that derives from ExtendsNode, and overrides
> get_parent
> - We have a custom Library implementation that overrides inclusion_tag(),
> which knows
> about our template lookup logic; it broke because the signatu
Thanks for the heads-up. My 50k python lines project is still running
1.2.7 + #12823. For some reason this patch can't seem to be commited,
despite being a potiential data-loss. I'm still worrying about
migrating to 1.3.1!
Best regards,
Philippe
On 14 March 2012 16:22, Dan Fairs wrote:
> Hi,
>
Wow, that's a big project! Thanks for sharing your success story. :)
On Wednesday, March 14, 2012 11:22:07 AM UTC-4, Dan Fairs wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Since most people only ever report bugs, I wanted to report success in the
> initial migration of a relatively large project (~35k lines of Python
>
Hi,
Since most people only ever report bugs, I wanted to report success in the
initial migration of a relatively large project (~35k lines of Python
application code, excluding comments and migrations, with ~43k lines of test
code over ~2.5k tests) to Django 1.4 rc1. The production environment
