I am using django with the geraldo reports engine and have recently
encountered problems. Of course this may be a geraldo problem and I
have made a similar post on that group. I am hoping, however, that
this might just ring a bell with someone.
Many text fields in the database contain ampersands
Thanks to everybody who replied, in the end I downloaded git, cloned
the django repository with with git clone and applied the patch with
git apply and it all worked well.
Paul Hide
On 26 Nov, 12:26, Tim Chase wrote:
> rebus_ wrote:
> >> diff --git
ty simple. There's
> quite a bit of info in the blog circles about this stuff, so you can
> find more specifics by searching online.
>
> Tim
>
> On Nov 25, 12:12 pm, paulh <paul.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I am interested in applying patch 7028, but I don't know wh
I am interested in applying patch 7028, but I don't know what to apply
it to.
Any help would be appreciated.
Paul Hide
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-us...@googlegroups.com.
To
Can somebody suggest things that you might do with the new(1.1)
get_urls method in ModelAdmin? I suspect that I must be missing
something.
Paul Hide
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users"
Using the admin list_display and a callable with its allow_tags
property set to True you can plant a link for each object on the
changle_list display page of the admin. Is there some way of making
this link dynamic without having to extend the
ModelAdmin.changelist_view and its associated
When using one of these fields in Add mode you make a choice of the
object from a popup window and the js returns the id into the field.
It would be very useful if it also tacked the unicode (that you see
whilst making the choice) corresponding to that id onto the end of the
field as it does when
I have used formfield_for_foreignkey in the admin and it works well.
However, suppose you have two foreign keys in your model and you want
to restrict the choices on both of them?
Paul Hide
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
on Pickling
QuerySets) suggest.
Paul Hide
On Aug 28, 5:49 pm, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 06:51 -0700, paulh wrote:
> > django svn version 8659
> > I have some django code that runs perfectly against postgres
> > (psycopg2), bu
django svn version 8659
I have some django code that runs perfectly against postgres
(psycopg2), but fails with: PicklingError: Can't pickle : attribute lookup
django.db.backends.oracle.query.OracleQuery failed
when run against an Oracle XE database.
Just wondered whether anyone else had
Use of the django default forms routines form_for_model,
form_for_instance on a model that has a foreign key that references a
table with a large number (thousands) of rows results in two problems.
One, you get an appreciable (5 seconds on a local network using
postgres and apache) delay while
Good idea and I have rechecked them; they all do return strings.
Paul Hide
On Sep 23, 3:42 pm, Alex Koshelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Check that your __str__/__unicode__ model's methods return strings
>
> On 23 сент, 17:41, paulh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&
I select a model in the initial admin page and am offered a choice of
the available instances/rows to change. If I either select one of
these, or press the add button I get the following error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/core/handlers/base.py"
is a number (often). Often, because old
habits die hard, when django wants a python object I go to great and
pointless lengths to get hold of the corresponding number and then get
an error.
On Sep 18, 2:27 pm, "Russell Keith-Magee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 9/18/07, paul
I got this error:
ERROR: current transaction is aborted, commands ignored until end of
transaction block SET client_encoding to 'UNICODE'
from django dev version 6373. There are a couple of hits when I
searched the list, but either I didn't understand them, or they are
not relevenat (or both).
▼ Local vars
Variable Value
encoding
u'utf-8'
errors
u'strict'
s
u'books'
strings_only
False
On Aug 10, 2:37 pm, Michael Radziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, paulh wrote:
>
> > I have tried the databrowse app on a
I have tried the databrowse app on a couple of projects, but it fails
on both with the same error. I wondered whether anyone else has seen
this error message:
coercing to Unicode: need string or buffer, __proxy__ found
If you need the whole stack, let me know.
Paul Hide
The code of views.generic.list_detail. object_list has the following
line:
queryset = queryset._clone(),
Looking at the rest of the code I can't quite see why this 'cloning'
operation takes place, but I have probably missed something.
If the code were to read:
try: queryset = queryset._clone()
The object_list generic view would be much more useful if it would
accept lists as well as querysets. The only thing that prevents this
is the line:
queryset = queryset._clone()
since lists don't have the _clone method.
The reason I want to do this is that I accumulate a list of things
from a
at the django code there doesn't seem to be any real
difference between a base_field and a field that is created in the
__init__ method; or maybe I've missed something.
Paul Hide
On Feb 18, 6:21 am, "Honza Král" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/18/07, paulh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
overriding the __init__ method. Is
that simplicity at some cost I wonder?
Paul Hide
On Feb 18, 12:35 am, "Arnaud Delobelle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Feb 17, 7:05 pm, "paulh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I feel the following should wor
I feel the following should work:
class Myform(forms.Form):
...publ = forms.ChoiceField(label='Publisher', required=False)
and then in handler I should be able to set the choices dynamically
by:
def meth(request):
...frm=Myform(initial={'publ':((1,2),(2,3),(3,4)))}) #even if the
brackets are
Many thanks to both Russ Magee and Andrew Durdin - all is now clear. I
will, as you suggest, try to come up with a passage that could be added
to the tutorial to clarify the ideas.
Seeing as it was I that had the problem I might be best suited to write
such a passage drawing on the contents of
This thread seems to have drifted away from its original purpose. The
tutorial authors seemed to have an idea about preventing the reposting
of data by use of a suitable redirect. I stated that I had been unable
to achieve this effect and asked whether anyone else had been able to
achieve it.
The subject is a phrase cut from one of the Django tutorials. In this
tutorial the authors say that after successfully processing POST data
you should return an HttpResponseRedirect and that this will prevent
the user using the back button and taking the action again. I have
messed around with
Using a GenericForeignKey everything seems to work until you try to use
fields in an Admin class. The you get an error like this:
FieldDoesNotExist at /modp/admin/tst2/comnam/add/
Comnam has no field named 'com_obj'
and a python dump.
Just updated by copy of django with the latest dev version and
Running through the django tutorials I noticed that you cannot create
the inner Admin class as a subclass of object. i.e.
class Admin(object):
-->pass
does not work. Is this deliberate or an historical quirk?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
27 matches
Mail list logo