On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 12:20:35PM -0500, James Bennett wrote:
> Keep in mind that's a wiki that *anyone* can contribute to, not just
> "official" developers ;)
And... because it's a wiki... have their contributions deleted too.
(mine were)
--
Glenn
--~--~-~--~~~---
On 5/5/06, falcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It looks like I'm not the only one thinking about these ideas, Django
> devs themselves have proposed this as one of the ideas for SOC coders
Keep in mind that's a wiki that *anyone* can contribute to, not just
"official" developers ;)
--
"May the
It looks like I'm not the only one thinking about these ideas, Django
devs themselves have proposed this as one of the ideas for SOC coders:
"create a project and super user with one command line statement, fire
up the development web server, and import/create/refine your model
using live data fr
A web-based model editor is not an easy task. I think vi is the right
modeller tool (after a paper/pencil session) or emacs if you're a
pianist.
For GUI-tools-aficionados I'd rather devote the effort to write code
generators for apps like umbrello
[http://uml.sourceforge.net/index.php]. A lot ea
On 5/3/06, falcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By users I meant users of the Django framework, not end-users. Since
> my last post I came across a few models (the ones you suggested) that
> do have a great deal more logic than I expected. I still believe that
> many 'developers' could benefit fr
falcon wrote:
> I still believe that
> many 'developers' could benefit from defining simple to moderately
> complex models on the web. If code needs to get more complex,
> developers can just switch back to using models.py.
>
I have gone in a different direction. I have written a tool to parse
By users I meant users of the Django framework, not end-users. Since
my last post I came across a few models (the ones you suggested) that
do have a great deal more logic than I expected. I still believe that
many 'developers' could benefit from defining simple to moderately
complex models on th
James Bennett wrote:
> Going further, it seems to me that, rather than encouraging the design
> of good, well-thought-out models, building models through a web
> interface would encourage a slapdash "if we get it wrong we'll just go
> into the web interface and change it" mentality, which would be
On 5/3/06, falcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder if you could say a few more words about why you think such a
> system will be abused? As far as I can tell, the models.py interface
> is simple enough to be ported completely to the web (it doesn't look
> like models.py is where you put comp
James,
Thanks for pointing to sites/models.py and auth/models.py, I'll take a
look.
I wonder if you could say a few more words about why you think such a
system will be abused? As far as I can tell, the models.py interface
is simple enough to be ported completely to the web (it doesn't look
like
On 5/3/06, falcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just started looking at Django, looks very interesting. However,
> couldn't models be defined in the admin page, rather than in python
> code? In fact, is there a reason why we couldn't download django, run
> the embedded web server, go to the adm
11 matches
Mail list logo