Re: [dmarc-ietf] Experiments

2021-09-28 Thread John R Levine
The simple solution if From: rewriting. I think you misspelled "ugly kludge" there. https://wiki.asrg.sp.am/wiki/Mitigating_DMARC_damage_to_third_party_mail#Replace_address_with_a_generic_one Yes, I know about that list of ugly kludges, since I wrote it. Note that forwarders should always r

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Experiments

2021-09-28 Thread Douglas Foster
Stated another way, the problem with ARC is that it requires the evaluator to attribute a positive reputation to the forwarder, in a context where even identifying the forwarder can be difficult. Most email is accepted on a much weaker criteria - the absence of negative reputation. Mailing lists

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Experiments

2021-09-28 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On Mon 27/Sep/2021 21:42:48 +0200 John Levine wrote: It appears that Alessandro Vesely said: There is a case (d) final receiver enforcea DMARC and ARC, but the forwarder is not among its ARC-trusted senders. The simple solution if From: rewriting. I think you misspelled "ugly kludge" there.