Scott, I have many problems with your response. Was it intended as an ad
hominem? It certainly came across that way.
If the NP objective can be stated in a sentence or two, you should have
done so, instead of telling me to read years of archive. An objective that
cannot be explained tersely
> Scott, I have many problems with your response. Was it intended as an ad
> hominem?
> It certainly came across that way.
It doesn't seem even remotely so to me. Please be careful with
attributing intent. No one tried to say that we shouldn't listen to
you.
> If the NP objective can be sta
On Wednesday, December 15, 2021 5:44:46 PM EST Barry Leiba wrote:
> > Scott, I have many problems with your response. Was it intended as an
> > ad hominem? It certainly came across that way.
>
> It doesn't seem even remotely so to me. Please be careful with
> attributing intent. No one tried
Thanks Scott. _dmarc.police.uk doesn't seem to have the 'np' tag.
There are a number of domains with policies that have 'p=quarantine|reject
sp=none' - it would be good to see if 'np=reject' is added to any.
tim
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 6:50 PM Scott Kitterman
wrote:
> On Wednesday, December
Agreed. That's the most recently added PSD record and my guess is they are
early in their journey. For those of you that haven't done it, managing
deployment of DMARC (+ DKIM and SPF) across a large number of domains is a
very time consuming process. Getting the internal policies right is at
Yes, this is important stuff.
This is one of my problem scenarios:
A record arrives at the first hop and obtains DMARC PASS, based on SPF
and/or DKIM interpreted by a DMARC policy. Based on DMARC PASS, the
RFC5322.From address is confidently judged to be "Honestly identified"
DMARC checks SPF a
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 12:58 AM Douglas Foster <
dougfoster.emailstanda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, this is important stuff.
>
> This is one of my problem scenarios:
>
> A record arrives at the first hop and obtains DMARC PASS, based on SPF
> and/or DKIM interpreted by a DMARC policy. Based on D
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 9:58 PM Douglas Foster <
dougfoster.emailstanda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, this is important stuff.
>
> This is one of my problem scenarios:
>
> A record arrives at the first hop and obtains DMARC PASS, based on SPF
> and/or DKIM interpreted by a DMARC policy. Based on DM
