Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tree walk in -06

2022-03-25 Thread Scott Kitterman
On March 24, 2022 12:01:39 PM UTC, Alessandro Vesely wrote: >On Wed 23/Mar/2022 12:08:16 +0100 Douglas Foster wrote: >> But we do have a difference between PSOs, which never send mail, and private >> registrars, which may or may not send mail from the domain or subdomain used >> as >> a priva

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tree walk in -06

2022-03-25 Thread Scott Kitterman
On March 24, 2022 6:53:13 PM UTC, John Levine wrote: >It appears that Murray S. Kucherawy said: >>-=-=-=-=-=- >> >>On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 10:35 AM Ken O'Driscoll >40wemonitoremail@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: >> >>> Having different behaviour for the absence of the tag and the default >>> valu

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Exception management

2022-03-25 Thread John Levine
It appears that Murray S. Kucherawy said: >Were I implementing such a thing, I'd probably have a list of overrides >that map names to DMARC records. For every name in the tree walk I'm going >to try, I'd check that list first for an override, and use that if one is >found. As we all know, some

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Exception management

2022-03-25 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 3:51 AM Douglas Foster < dougfoster.emailstanda...@gmail.com> wrote: > Exception management is straightforward when using the PSL. The system > administrator simply maintains an errata file that is used to add entries > to, or remove entries from the downloaded PSL file.

[dmarc-ietf] Exception management

2022-03-25 Thread Douglas Foster
Exception management is straightforward when using the PSL. The system administrator simply maintains an errata file that is used to add entries to, or remove entries from the downloaded PSL file. If the PSL does not list "onmicrosoft.com", but I want it treated as a registrar, I simply insert