Scott wrote:
> On May 30, 2022 9:50:05 PM UTC, David Bustos wrote:
> >Since I own david.bustos.name, someone forwards da...@bustos.name for me; I
> >presume Verisign does.
> >
> >Lately I think email receivers have been quarantining my messages and I
> >suspect the reason is SPF. Specifically,
John wrote:
> It appears that Scott Kitterman said:
> >On May 30, 2022 9:50:05 PM UTC, David Bustos wrote:
> >>Since I own david.bustos.name, someone forwards da...@bustos.name for me; I
> >>presume Verisign does.
> >>
> >>Lately I think email receivers have been quarantining my messages and I
On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 1:14 PM David Bustos wrote:
> John wrote:
> > It appears that Scott Kitterman said:
> > >On May 30, 2022 9:50:05 PM UTC, David Bustos wrote:
> > >>Since I own david.bustos.name, someone forwards da...@bustos.name for
> me; I presume Verisign does.
> > >>
> > >>Lately I
On Tue, 31 May 2022, David Bustos wrote:
Forwarding is pretty broken these days. Even if you had perfect SPF, a lot of
your incoming
mail would fail DMARC because a lot of DMARC policies depend on SPF and SPF
can't deal with forwarded mail.
I'm talking about outgoing mail, not incoming mail.
On Tue, May 31, 2022, at 1:33 PM, John R Levine wrote:
> On Tue, 31 May 2022, David Bustos wrote:
>>> Forwarding is pretty broken these days. Even if you had perfect SPF, a lot
>>> of your incoming
>>> mail would fail DMARC because a lot of DMARC policies depend on SPF and SPF
>>> can't deal wit
On May 31, 2022 7:50:44 PM UTC, David Bustos wrote:
>On Tue, May 31, 2022, at 1:33 PM, John R Levine wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 May 2022, David Bustos wrote:
Forwarding is pretty broken these days. Even if you had perfect SPF, a
lot of your incoming
mail would fail DMARC because a lo
It appears that Scott Kitterman said:
>>Is your position that Verisign should publish SPF records for the .name
>>domains?
>
>If they intend them to be used in email, then I would say yes. If they intend
>third level domain owners such as yourself send email
>from external servers using the se
David's goal for the name registration is different from what Verisign
intended. Here is what I have inferred:
Verisign wants to sell personal identity PKI certificates to the masses,
for use with S/MIMIE. A personal PKI certificate requires a subject name
and an owner email address. "first.l
