It appears that Scott Kitterman <skl...@kitterman.com> said: >>Is your position that Verisign should publish SPF records for the .name >>domains? > >If they intend them to be used in email, then I would say yes. If they intend >third level domain owners such as yourself send email >from external servers using the second level domain in Mail From, it's >non-trivial to support, but definitely possible.
Except there are 100,000 registrants in .name and the registry only handles inbound mail. Every registrant who wants to send mail makes their own arrangements which means there are potentially 100,000 different systems sending mail. In David's case, he's the only registrant in under busdos.name but it varies a lot, and there's no promise that a dozen other people with similar names won't register ermintrude.busdos.name or whatever. >I don't know anything specific about the contract for .name, but I believe >such contracts are usually available on the ICANN web site. All of the contracts are on the ICANN web site. Ten seconds of googlage found it: https://www.icann.org/en/registry-agreements/details/name R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
