+1 no need to mention zone cuts
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 2, 2022, at 13:08, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>
>
>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 9:06 AM Ken O'Driscoll
>> wrote:
>
>> > I'm with Barry. I see no reason to mention zone cuts or anything like
>> > zone cuts at all.
>> >
>> > They
Been thinking on this - #4 is great option.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 3, 2021, at 11:49, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> Sure you can. In your example host1 has an a record.
>
> Scott K
>
>> On Wednesday, November 3, 2021 11:42:44 AM EDT Douglas Foster wrote:
>> Correct, but you cannot
I like Dave’s idea here about leaving them changing their value to none.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 20, 2021, at 22:45, Dave Crocker wrote:
>
> On 7/20/2021 7:04 PM, John Levine wrote:
>> I suppose we should have a Former DMARC Tags registry to prevent them
>> from being recycled with a
I’ve got some I’ll commit in the am.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 5, 2021, at 03:37, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>
>
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 9:35 AM Murray S. Kucherawy
>> wrote:
>
>> And with that, I'll set up the Last Call.
>
> Last Call has ended. Scott/Tim, please make whatever
We’re working on canceling the meeting.
Tim
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 22, 2021, at 16:59, Dotzero wrote:
>
>
> So I'm assuming there won't be anything to talk about at the next IETF
> meeting.
>
> Michael Hammer
>
>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:59 PM Seth Blank
>> wrote:
>> On 27
I agree strongly with Dave on creating boring and precise
terminology/references, and they are used over and over.
Tim
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 9, 2020, at 12:40, Dave Crocker wrote:
>
> On 12/8/2020 12:11 PM, Dotzero wrote:
>> Note that I asked Two questions. Your answer appears
+1
No hats
From my high tech gadget
> On Aug 2, 2019, at 02:23, Stan Kalisch wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019, at 11:14 PM, John Levine wrote:
>> Catching up on my mail after a laptop disaster, ...
>>
>> In article <4600949.rz9u5RyGOV@l5580> you write:
>> >I think comments should be
Also totally willing to tackle this.
>From my high tech gadget
> On Nov 8, 2018, at 15:47, John R Levine wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 8 Nov 2018, tjw ietf wrote:
>> I remember the two hog mentioned but there could of been a third.
>
> At this point I can't find any of
Agree with John but from the dns side, simpler solutions tend to get traction
faster.
John May agree with that.
>From my high tech gadget
> On Nov 8, 2018, at 15:47, John R Levine wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 8 Nov 2018, tjw ietf wrote:
>> I remember the two hog mentioned bu
I remember the two hog mentioned but there could of been a third.
From my high tech gadget
> On Nov 8, 2018, at 15:19, Kurt Andersen (b) wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 1:17 PM John Levine wrote:
>> In article <0e28da8c-09a6-4e64-ad5e-3741efe60...@kitterman.com> you write:
>>
Total +1 on this.
>From my high tech gadget
> On Nov 8, 2018, at 10:00, Steven M Jones wrote:
>
>> On 11/07/2018 11:41 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> I'd suggest we adopt the draft/work item and then try to figure it out.
>
> +1. We should see where we can get with this topic.
>
> --S.
>
>
7601bis looks good for WGLC
Tim
>From my high tech gadget
> On Jul 11, 2018, at 23:22, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
>
>
>> On July 12, 2018 12:20:39 AM UTC, John Levine wrote:
>> In article <2940516.WEBi8fTYBz@kitterma-e6430> you write:
>>> Is the list of EAI affected components of the field
12 matches
Mail list logo
