On 1/6/2015 1:25 PM, John R Levine wrote:
RFC 7208 is quite clear about what constitutes an SPF pass.
Perhaps it should be referenced rather than RFC 4408 then.
Right, 4408 is now obsolete.
Not operationally.
SPF PASS is what "Local Policy" implementation options has allowed for
the last
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 10:25 AM, John R Levine wrote:
> RFC 7208 is quite clear about what constitutes an SPF pass.
>>>
>>
>> Perhaps it should be referenced rather than RFC 4408 then.
>>
>
> Right, 4408 is now obsolete.
>
Fixed in -11.
-MSK
___
dmarc
RFC 7208 is quite clear about what constitutes an SPF pass.
Perhaps it should be referenced rather than RFC 4408 then.
Right, 4408 is now obsolete.
Regards,
John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail.
On 1/5/15 6:18 PM, John Levine wrote:
>> Not mentioned anywhere: Which SPF modes are considered to be a "pass"
>>> for purposes of DMARC? Presumably +, presumably not -, but it should say
>>> something about ? and ~ if it doesn't already.
>> Not only is that another late-stage technical issue to pu
>Not mentioned anywhere: Which SPF modes are considered to be a "pass"
>> for purposes of DMARC? Presumably +, presumably not -, but it should say
>> something about ? and ~ if it doesn't already.
>
>Not only is that another late-stage technical issue to punt to the working
>group, but I also claim
On Monday, January 05, 2015 02:11:17 PM Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Jim Fenton wrote:
...
> > Not mentioned anywhere: Which SPF modes are considered to be a "pass"
> > for purposes of DMARC? Presumably +, presumably not -, but it should say
> > something about ? an
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Jim Fenton wrote:
> I went back over my -04 comments while looking at -09, and the great
> majority have been resolved. There are still a few things that haven't
> been adequately addressed, as far as I can tell, nor resolved on-list.
> I haven't thoroughly gone th
I went back over my -04 comments while looking at -09, and the great
majority have been resolved. There are still a few things that haven't
been adequately addressed, as far as I can tell, nor resolved on-list.
I haven't thoroughly gone through the -09 draft, and don't think that
would yield much
