apps-discuss isn't interested in demarc procedural issues, I suppose.
Hector Santos writes:
> IMO, your proposal is on par with the engineering considerations
> needed to develop and mold the charter.
Maybe, that's for Barry to decide, I believe. My opinion is that this
part of the discussion
Hi Wei,
IMO, your proposal is on par with the engineering considerations needed to
develop and mold the charter. Your proposal intent is to preserve the
integrity and indirectly, the authorization for forwarding, resigning mail.
The draft charter has its own even higher complex ideas for t
On 6/28/2014 9:41 AM, Wei Chuang wrote:
Note this isn't a full proposal as we would like the concept to be
considered first. If this discussion is successful, we would like to also
discuss a related improvement to SPF and DMARC, as well as the binary
encoding change. At the conclusion we can ha
