On Thu, 21 Dec 2017, at 17:12, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Brandon Long
> wrote:>>
>> I think algorithm rotation is more challenging for ARC than it is for
>> DKIM, since with DKIM you can just sign with both... but for ARC,
>> there's a chain of signers and the
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Brandon Long wrote:
> I think algorithm rotation is more challenging for ARC than it is for
> DKIM, since with DKIM you can just sign with both... but for ARC, there's a
> chain of signers and the you have to handle links not being able to verify
> intermediate st
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 11:40 AM Murray S. Kucherawy
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Kurt Andersen (b)
> wrote:
>
>> * Update the AAR definition section (formerly 5.1) using Seth's suggested
>> 7601bis wording (also adjusting for feedback that came in on the list) and
>> annotating the
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Kurt Andersen (b) wrote:
> * Update the AAR definition section (formerly 5.1) using Seth's suggested
> 7601bis wording (also adjusting for feedback that came in on the list) and
> annotating the section to be adjusted if we can kick off the 7601bis work
> in a tim
I've just posted new drafts of both the protocol and usage documents:
Name: draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol
Revision: 10
Title: Authenticated Received Chain (ARC) Protocol
Document date: 2017-12-19
Group: dmarc
Pages: 49
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-10.txt
