On Thu 02/Nov/2023 12:17:30 +0100 Olivier Hureau wrote:
It is also related to one of the discussion I opened about duplicate tag :
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/NAWZlMNnXt9m_MCvuou9IiYxSrA/ Murray
pointed out that a parser is also supposed to follow the DKIM specifications.
Hi,
I'm digging up an old discussion, sorry.
It is also related to one of the discussion I opened about duplicate tag :
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/NAWZlMNnXt9m_MCvuou9IiYxSrA/
Murray pointed out that a parser is also supposed to follow the DKIM
specifications.
Finally,
Seems reasonable. Thanks for the warning on the required white space
engineering.
Scott K
On February 27, 2023 6:05:11 PM UTC, John Levine wrote:
>It appears that Tim Wicinski said:
>>-=-=-=-=-=-
>>
>>I agree that we should fix this tolerance in the bis document.
>
>I made a pull request.
It appears that Tim Wicinski said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>I agree that we should fix this tolerance in the bis document.
I made a pull request. The change is four characters but the pull request
looks complicated because I had to futz with whitespace to keep xml2rfc
from complaining that things are
On Mon 27/Feb/2023 16:17:33 +0100 Tim Wicinski wrote:
I agree that we should fix this tolerance in the bis document.
I agree we should fix the grammar, but the general syntax of dmarcbis allows
trailing spaces.
I tried and verified it using the IETF's extractor[*] and an ABNF to regex
I agree that we should fix this tolerance in the bis document.
tim
with no hat on
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 9:48 AM Murray S. Kucherawy
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 2:29 AM Tõnu Tammer
> wrote:
>
>> I am curious to know what the stance is on trailing whitespace within
>> DMARC records.
>>
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 2:29 AM Tõnu Tammer
wrote:
> I am curious to know what the stance is on trailing whitespace within
> DMARC records.
>
> Strictly following the RFC 7489 and the formal specification in section
> 6.4, if there is no trailing dmarc-sep with the associated semicolon,
>
Dear colleagues,
I am curious to know what the stance is on trailing whitespace within DMARC
records.
Strictly following the RFC 7489 and the formal specification in section 6.4, if
there is no trailing dmarc-sep with the associated semicolon, trailing
whitespace is not allowed.
