[dmarc-ietf] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-16

2018-07-17 Thread Barry Leiba
So begins Working Group Last Call (WGLC) on draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-16. Please review the latest version: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol/ . and send comments to the DMARC working group mailing list by 3 August. If you review it and think it's ready to go

Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-16

2018-08-01 Thread A. Schulze
Hello WG, Seth pushed me to really /read/ the whole draft, thanks! I noted the following points that may or may not be so important... - section-2.1 introduce "AMDM" defined later in section-3 - I read https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-16 in section-3, the links point to

Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-16

2018-08-01 Thread Seth Blank
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 8:53 AM, A. Schulze wrote: > - section-2.1 introduce "AMDM" defined later in section-3 > Great catch. Based on Dave Crocker's feedback, we've defined the term "Authentication Assessment" and moved the entire second paragraph of 2.1 into this definition, which ends up addre

Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-16

2018-08-03 Thread Steven M Jones
It's been quite a while since my last full read-through of the spec, so apologies if I blunder into anything long-settled. And apologies if I'm repeating something from earlier commentary, I'm trying to get in under a very liberal interpretation of the deadline as is... ;) Love the way Secti

Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-16

2018-08-05 Thread Brotman, Alexander
his point? -- Alex Brotman Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse Comcast -Original Message- From: dmarc [mailto:dmarc-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Barry Leiba Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 5:27 PM To: dmarc@ietf.org Subject: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-16 So begins Working Group