On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 7:46 AM Todd Herr wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 9:24 PM Neil Anuskiewicz
> wrote:
>
>> To clarify, these aren’t the changes from a week ago but for the whole
>> document this time. Sorry for the top post.
>>
>> On Sep 8, 2022, at 4:10 PM, Neil Anuskiewicz
>> wrote:
>>
>
On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 7:46 AM Todd Herr wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 9:24 PM Neil Anuskiewicz
> wrote:
>
>> To clarify, these aren’t the changes from a week ago but for the whole
>> document this time. Sorry for the top post.
>>
>> On Sep 8, 2022, at 4:10 PM, Neil Anuskiewicz
>> wrote:
>>
>
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 9:24 PM Neil Anuskiewicz
wrote:
> To clarify, these aren’t the changes from a week ago but for the whole
> document this time. Sorry for the top post.
>
> On Sep 8, 2022, at 4:10 PM, Neil Anuskiewicz wrote:
>
>
> I went ahead and committed my changes. I hope these small
To clarify, these aren’t the changes from a week ago but for the whole document
this time. Sorry for the top post.
> On Sep 8, 2022, at 4:10 PM, Neil Anuskiewicz wrote:
>
>
> I went ahead and committed my changes. I hope these small changes are
> helpful.
>
> Neil
>
>> On Sat, Aug 27, 202
I went ahead and committed my changes. I hope these small changes are
helpful.
Neil
On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 9:12 PM John R Levine wrote:
> If you're feeling really enterprising you can do a github pull request,
> but sending the suggested changes to this list is fine.
>
> On Sat, 27 Aug 2022, N
If you're feeling really enterprising you can do a github pull request,
but sending the suggested changes to this list is fine.
On Sat, 27 Aug 2022, Neil Anuskiewicz wrote:
Cool! I'll proofread the whole document within two weeks unless there's a
tighter timeline. I've heard talk on the list a
Cool! I'll proofread the whole document within two weeks unless there's a
tighter timeline. I've heard talk on the list about rounding the bend on
the last lap to the finish.
In addition to proofreading, I'd rewrite for clarity here and there. Then,
of course, you could reject any of it.
How exac
Thanks, we can always use more proofreading. I'll put those in the next pull
request.
It appears that Neil Anuskiewicz said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
> I'm not sure if minor things like misspellings, grammar, and other minutia
>are useful. I figured I'd try to contribute in a small way. If these kinds
I'm not sure if minor things like misspellings, grammar, and other minutia
are useful. I figured I'd try to contribute in a small way. If these kinds
of suggestions are useful, let me know, and I can do more in the future and
maybe dive into slightly more.
1. Introduction says:
Abusive email oft
