Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base updated (-06)

2014-12-31 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Rolf E. Sonneveld r.e.sonnev...@sonnection.nl wrote: 3.1.3 Flow diagram The box titled 'User Mailbox' could give the impression that there's only one choice for delivery. However, quarantining can be done without delivery to a mailbox. I'd suggest to

Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base updated (-06)

2014-12-23 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
Hi Rolf, getting back to your review (thanks for the nudge): On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Rolf E. Sonneveld r.e.sonnev...@sonnection.nl wrote: Abstract: This lack of cohesion has several effects: receivers have difficulty providing feedback to senders about authentication, senders

Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base updated (-06)

2014-11-12 Thread Rolf E. Sonneveld
Hi, Murray, On 11/11/2014 02:52 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: I've posted an update to the base draft, based on recent feedback from Ned and others. Hopefully I've resolved all of the concerns (especially the major ones), as the ISE would like to send the draft to the IESG for conflict

Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base updated (-06)

2014-11-11 Thread Dave Crocker
On 11/10/2014 5:52 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: I've posted an update to the base draft, based on recent feedback from Ned and others. Tidbits... Intro: Security terms used in this document are defined in [SEC-TERMS]. There's a Terminology section, so this really belongs there.

[dmarc-ietf] draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base updated (-06)

2014-11-10 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
I've posted an update to the base draft, based on recent feedback from Ned and others. Hopefully I've resolved all of the concerns (especially the major ones), as the ISE would like to send the draft to the IESG for conflict review in the next day or two. It also has to begin formal review of