>> the spec does not define *which* DKIM signature should be reported in
>> the DMARC RUA created by a receiver.
>> [... skip proposed order ...]
>
> This seems overcomplex. How about saying the reports SHOULD include
> all valid DKIM reports. If they can't, they can't, and I don't see
> any be
Hello,
what is the purpose of the aggregate reports (rua)?
Regards
Дилян
On Fri, 2019-06-21 at 12:06 -0700, Elizabeth Zwicky wrote:
> I believe they MUST contain any aligned DKIM signature regardless of validity
> and SHOULD contain an entry for each domain, selector, result triple.
>
> El
The problem with that language is that
o The identifier evaluated by DKIM and the DKIM result, if any
is genuinely unclear. Often there are multiple identifiers. Does this mean I
can pick any one of them? (That does not actually provide sufficient
interoperability.) If there’s a specific on
The problem with that language is that
> o The identifier evaluated by DKIM and the DKIM result, if any
is genuinely unclear. Often there are multiple identifiers. Does this mean I
can pick any one of them? (That does not actually provide sufficient
interoperability.) If there’s a specific on
I believe they MUST contain any aligned DKIM signature regardless of validity
and SHOULD contain an entry for each domain, selector, result triple.
RFC 7489 says:
The report SHOULD include the following data:
o The DMARC policy discovered and applied, if any
o The selected messag
I believe they MUST contain any aligned DKIM signature regardless of validity
and SHOULD contain an entry for each domain, selector, result triple.
Elizabeth
> On Jun 21, 2019, at 11:46 AM, John Levine wrote:
>
> In article <7cd366d2-ab8d-cce8-67ff-59b79183c...@tomki.com> you write:
>> As
In article <7cd366d2-ab8d-cce8-67ff-59b79183c...@tomki.com> you write:
>As mentioned by Elizabeth recently: (Elizabeth please chime in if this
>doesn't capture your meaning)
>
>the spec does not define *which* DKIM signature should be reported in
>the DMARC RUA created by a receiver. The propos
As mentioned by Elizabeth recently: (Elizabeth please chime in if this
doesn't capture your meaning)
the spec does not define *which* DKIM signature should be reported in
the DMARC RUA created by a receiver. The proposed resolution to this is
that if the receiver does not provide the complet
