Re: [dmarc-discuss] Metrics on policy actions

2017-04-24 Thread John Wilson via dmarc-discuss
Anthony, Do you mean "versus local policy-overrides"? John On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Anthony Purcell via dmarc-discuss < dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I was wondering if any dmarc implementors had any stats on what percentage > of your mail stream matches the various

Re: [dmarc-discuss] I Need help to get everything to 100% - Microsoft and dmarctest.org fails

2017-04-24 Thread Marko Nix via dmarc-discuss
Dear Juri, thanks for your support! That was the answer I needed. I think the generic list was the right to address - I have atm no problems with OpenDMARC (which is surely running on my system). It was about my failing reports and as I did not find any further information about dmarctest.org

Re: [dmarc-discuss] I Need help to get everything to 100% - Microsoft and dmarctest.org fails

2017-04-24 Thread Juri Haberland via dmarc-discuss
Marko Nix via dmarc-discuss wrote: > I am running a CentOS server, with configured Postfix / Dovecot setup. What DMARC software do you use? I assume it is OpenDMARC - if so, the opendmarc-users ML might be better suited than this generic DMARC mailing list. > My other problem is that every

[dmarc-discuss] I Need help to get everything to 100% - Microsoft and dmarctest.org fails

2017-04-24 Thread Marko Nix via dmarc-discuss
Dear all, first of all: many thanks for all your hopefully provided help. I am running a CentOS server, with configured Postfix / Dovecot setup. I have a problem with Microsoft (dkim=temperror) and dmarctest.org (SPF alignment fail). I think my Microsoft problem will need some time because of