It appears that Sean Malloy via dmarc-discuss said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>I work for a MSP and we recently added an spf TXT record and Dmarc TXT record
>for a clients dns. We have a DL setup in the clients o365 tenant
>that send an email to our ticketing system whenever something from the dmarc
On Fri, 31 Dec 2021, su...@banbreach.com wrote:
By planned changes, are you referring to draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-04?
Yes.
When you say this is not a bug, do you mean "this is not a bug in the RFC" or
"this is not a bug in the
dmarc checker tool"?
No. I mean that it is not a bug that it
On Friday, December 31, 2021 04:33 IST, Scott Kitterman via dmarc-discuss
wrote:
> On Thursday, December 30, 2021 3:24:43 PM EST su...@banbreach.com via dmarc-
> discuss wrote:
> > On Friday, December 31, 2021 00:05 IST, Scott Kitterman via dmarc-discuss
> wrote:
> > > On Thursday, December
On Friday, December 31, 2021 00:41 IST, John Levine via dmarc-discuss
wrote:
> It appears that Scott Kitterman via dmarc-discuss said:
> >> osx:~ test$ dig _dmarc.gov.in txt
>
> >> Does RFC 7489 allow an eTLD to set up a DMARC record?
> >
> >It does not. RFC 9091 does.
>
> Also keep in
I work for a MSP and we recently added an spf TXT record and Dmarc TXT record
for a clients dns. We have a DL setup in the clients o365 tenant that send an
email to our ticketing system whenever something from the dmarc triggers an
email to the DL. Today in our ticketing system we got a ticket
