RemoveEl 9 jul. 2019 9:00 a. m., dmarc-discuss-requ...@dmarc.org escribió:Send dmarc-discuss mailing list submissions to
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
or, via email, send a message with subje
ay, January 9, 2019 11:30 AM
> *To:* Paul Rock
> *Cc:* T Nguyen; dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
> *Subject:* Re: [dmarc-discuss] help!
>
> That is a mistake a LOT of senders make, and it's often the fault of their
> ESP which provided incomplete or even wrong information.
>
mfrom*
>> * pass*
>> **
>> **
>>
>> --
>> *From:* Zachary Aab
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 9, 2019 10:25 AM
>> *To:* T Nguyen
>> *Cc:* Paul Rock; dmarc-discuss
ng
> against the subdomain xyz.abc.com
>
> **
> *abc.com <http://abc.com>*
> **
> **
> * *
> * *
> *ESP.com*
> *mfrom*
> *pass*
> **
> **
>
> --
> *From:* Zachary Aab
>
14.3739 | C: 706-870-1061 | z...@inboxpros.com
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 9:01 PM T Nguyen wrote:
>
>
> Thanks Paul, does DMARC fail even with adfs and adkim implicitly as “r”
> relaxed?
>
>
>
> *From:* Paul Rock
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 8, 2019 2:54 PM
> *To:* T Ng
No, mfrom is the RFC5321 sender (the MAIL FROM: during the SMTP
transaction). The user visible from address is the RFC5322 from header.
Which is why even though it passed SPF, SPF Fails on DMARC evaluation
because 5321 mail from domain of "ESP.com" doesn't align with the 5322 from
header domain of
1. Yep
2. This is whatever domain was in the Header From (5322.from) of the emails
being described in that row. If any email is sent "from" a subdomain that
doesn't have its own DMARC record (as seen by the receiver), that subdomain
will appear in a line as well.
3. The Aggregate report .xml has
Implement DKIM with as many of your third parties as possible. Most have
now realised that they can do their own key-rotation if they simply
specify two CNAME records for you to put into your zone file (rather
than issue you a key, or have you issue them one). Third-party SPF will
generally not
SPF authentication only, no dkim just yet. As domain controller owner we have
issue with multiple third party application email senders, which fail
specifically our spf authentication. with too many third party email
applications that overwhelms our spf records. Since these application email
pr
> On Sep 26, 2018, at 5:40 PM, Jonathan Knopp via dmarc-discuss
> wrote:
>
> To play devil's advocate: it doesn't explicitly provide unsubscribe
> instructions directly in the email itself. A non-savvy user likely wouldn't
> think to follow the non-obvious info link in the footer. And not al
t; *Sent:* Wednesday, September 26, 2018 12:56 PM
> *To:* t.nguye...@outlook.com
> *Cc:* dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
> *Subject:* Re: [dmarc-discuss] Help
>
>
>
> No problem!
>
> It's not strictly necessary, realistically most receivers will likely
> handle lit
s
> generated.
>
>
>
> Is the semicolon needed for the rua clause t the end for dmarc statement?
> I’ve checked a couple including google.com but did not see any semicolon
> on their dmarc record.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Tien
>
>
>
>
In article
you write:
>Might be better to have an MX record that points to localhost, because
>if you have an A record but no MX, people will just try to connect to
>the A record.
There's an RFC for that:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7505
R's,
John
--
Regards,
John Levine, jo...@iecc.com, P
Use a null mx instead.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7505
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018, 8:43 AM Al Iverson via dmarc-discuss <
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote:
> Might be better to have an MX record that points to localhost, because
> if you have an A record but no MX, people will just try to connect to
Might be better to have an MX record that points to localhost, because
if you have an A record but no MX, people will just try to connect to
the A record.
Though I've never tried it for domains that lack an MX DNS entry, I do
think overall that DMARC (and SPF) are both good things to configure
for
The sub/domain should be protected by the DMARC record even without an MX
record, I can't find anything in the RFC to say otherwise and some senders
(mostly marketing, ime) use 5322.from domains with no MX records and a
"Reply-to:" header with a working domain.
>Could the syntax error caused by th
What is a DMARC syntax error? (Which tool gave this? What operation was
it performing at the time?)
Yes,
example.com TXT "v=spf1 -all"
_dmarc.example.com "v=DMARC1; p=reject;"
is a reasonable way to announce that a domain can never be used for
sending email.
- Roland
On 26/09/18 10:
eptember 30, 2012 9:25 AM
To: "dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org<mailto:dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org>"
mailto:dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org>>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-discuss] Help Some Stranger is Using My Email
There's nothing in the base email protocols that prevents one from sending mail
as you.
nt DMARC and/or protocols like it.
-MSK
From:
mailto:ther...@americanrecruitmentservices.com>>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:45:34 -0700
To: mailto:dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org>>
Subject: [dmarc-discuss] Help Some Stranger is Using My Email
Help! Some stranger is using my email address to e
ther...@americanrecruitmentservices.com skrev den 29-09-2012 02:45:
Help! Some stranger is using my email address to email out to others
spam and junk emails. I am getting the bounced back emails in my
inbox.
block the bounce sender ip, not the sender, atleast that way you can
say if thay want
John Levine skrev den 29-09-2012 06:13:
On a bad day, I've gotten 300,000 bounced back messages due to
spammers forging my addresses. How many are you seeing?
could you be less sakastisk here ?
___
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.or
In article
<20120928174534.686b293d225b331299ec831982b2e377.bc8a0f7fd6@email16.secureserver.net>
you write:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>Help! Some stranger is using my email address to email out to others spam and
>junk emails. I am getting the bounced back emails in my inbox.
On a bad day, I've gotte
Help! Some stranger is using my email address to email out to others spam and junk emails. I am getting the bounced back emails in my inbox. I contacted Support at Go Daddy and they told me to create an SPF record. It did not work.I wonder how a person learned to do this?What can I do to stop t
23 matches
Mail list logo
