Hi Danny,
Thanks a lot for the very good review you provided. We've just posted
revision -03 addressing your comments. Rev -02 was also submitted after
Montreal, addressing Lyle's also very good review.
We'd like to ask the WG for feedback on current version. From authors'
point of view the docum
Hi,
We've just posted a new version addressing a very detailed review from
Lyle (thanks!).
Please, check and provide comments on the mailing list.
Thanks,
Carlos
On Wed, 2018-08-29 at 02:16 -0700, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Dra
Hi,
We've just posted a new version addressing comments received from a
very good review from Lyle.
We need more reviews! Any volunteer? It's a short document to read.
Thanks!
Carlos
On Wed, 2018-08-29 at 02:05 -0700, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the
Hi Sri,
Thanks. We have just submitted it as draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-00 (no
changes over draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01, we will now start
addressing the comments received on the mailing list).
Thanks!
Carlos
On Thu, 2018-04-12 at 16:46 +, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) wrote:
> Thank you
with MFA ideas.
> 4. SRv6 could be user plane protocol with the control plane protocol.
>
> One question here is that whether the authors are interested in User
> Plane white paper which Kalyani lead files this solution.
>
> Cheers,
> --satoru
>
> > 2018/03/06 22:1
t regards,
>
> Daniel Corujo
> Instituto de Telecomunicações - Pólo de Aveiro
> http://www.it.pt
>
>
>
> Watch our VIDEO: https://youtu.be/lI8DnmBnEtU
> Internet Technology Letters Journal is accepting publications: http:/
> /onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10
ussions in the
> mailer on this document. We therefore request the WG for feedback in
> the mailer. We plan to issue an adoption call post IETF101, but we
> need some feedback and substantial comments.
>
>
> Dapeng & Sri
>
>
>
>
> On 3/6/18, 2:17 PM, "dmm on
Hi Alex,
On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 11:06 +0100, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
>
> Le 12/03/2018 à 00:58, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano a écrit :
> [...]
> > > However, I have difficulty to grasp the term 'distributed
> > > logical
> > > interface'.
Hi Alex,
Thanks a lot for your review. Comments inline below.
On Fri, 2018-03-09 at 18:29 +0100, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
>
> Le 06/03/2018 à 23:17, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > We have submitted a revised version of our draft addressing the
ould be described.
Thanks, we will clarify in -02. We actually refer to the Valid
Lifetime, so the address is deprecated.
Thanks!
Carlos
>
> Regards,
> -Xinpeng (Jackie)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Jesús
> Bernardos
ed!]
> edge ir the => edge or the [edge near the?]
All fixed.
Thanks a lot!
Carlos
>
> Thanks and best regards
> Dirk
> -Original Message-
> From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Jesús
> Bernardos Cano
> Sent: Dienstag, 6. März 2018 23:18
&g
;ll take the current version and we can follow your proposal to talk
> before the f2f.
>
> marco
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Jesús
> Bernardos Cano
> Sent: Dienstag, 6. März 2018 22:40
> To: Sri Gundavelli
Hi,
We have submitted a revised version of our draft addressing the
comments we got in Singapore:
- Added some statements about which model from draft-ietf-dmm-
deployment-models our solution follows (addressing a comment received
from Sri).
- Added some text relating to draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-m
Hi Sri,
Apologies for the delayed reaction. We were busy with the last minute
I-D submission.
Regarding the changes that went into -08, this is my summary:
- Drastic shortening of the document, aiming at reducing its complexity
and length. We have shortened from ~45 pages to ~15 pages.
- Simpli
Hi,
I support adoption.
Thanks,
Carlos
On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 00:02 +, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) wrote:
> Folks:
>
> The following message commences a two week call for opinions on the
> adoption of draft-matsushima-spring-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-03 as a
> DMM Working document.
>
> ---
> T
Hi,
I've reviewed -07 and I think all the comments I made to -05 have been
address to a level good enough to make the document progress. I haven't
been able to do a full review, but looking at the diff from -05 to -06
it seems OK to me.
Apologies for the belated reply.
Thanks,
Carlos
On Fri, 2
s,
Carlos
On Thu, 2017-06-01 at 21:26 +, h chan wrote:
> Carlos,
> If you had already started to review version 3, I wonder if it might
> work faster to send those comments first.
> I think the differences between version 3 and version 5 are mostly
> not in major technical issues
ections
> and comments on the earlier version if it is more convenient to you.
> If the comment is on a particular page in an earlier version, I will
> figure out where it applies to the latest version.
>
> H. Anthony Chan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Carlos
Hi Sri,
Sure, no prob, but I might need one additional week as next week I'm
off on vacation. Hope that's fine.
Thanks,
Carlos
On Wed, 2017-04-05 at 15:14 +, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) wrote:
> Hi Marco, Carlos, Seil & Biju,
>
> I believe you have all kindly agreed to review the below draft
between /dev/null and /dev/random
> Protocol Engineering Lab., Sangmyung University
>
> #email: jonghy...@gmail.com
> #webpage: https://sites.google.com/site/hurryon
>
> > On Mar 28, 2017, at 01:05, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano > m.es> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
>
Hi,
Regarding the comment I made related to draft-yan-dmm-man-00, this is
the paper I've mentioned:
"The costs and benefits of combining different IP mobility standards"
Antonio de la Oliva, Ignacio Soto, María Calderón, Carlos J. Bernardos
and M. Isabel Sanchez
Computer Standards and Interfaces,
Hi,
Very late, I know. But I'd like to express also support on this I-D. I
think it is ready to move forward.
Carlos
On Tue, 2016-06-07 at 10:13 -0700, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
> Folks,
>
> This email starts the WGLC #2 for
> draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01. Post your comment to
> the
Hi,
Though I'm late I would like to express support on this document. I
think it is ready to move forards.
Carlos
On Wed, 2016-06-15 at 10:16 -0700, Jouni wrote:
> Folks,
>
> This email starts the WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-
> 05. Post your comment to the mailing list and also
Hi Jouni, all,
Although I'm already late, I just wanted to express my post-adoption
call to the three drafts.
Carlos
On Wed, 2015-12-16 at 08:32 -0800, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
> Folks,
>
> The WG adoption call for all three I-Ds have completed:
> draft-gundavelli-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-para
Hi,
I support adoption of this I-D. I think it is a very good starting
point.
Carlos
On Thu, 2015-04-02 at 07:21 -0700, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
> Folks,
>
> This emails starts a two week call for the I-D
>draft-wt-dmm-fpc-cpdp-00
> to confirm the adoption as a DMM WG document. The call ends A
Hi,
I support adoption of this I-D. I think it is good as a starting point.
Carlos
On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 17:03 -0700, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
> Folks,
>
> This email starts a two week adoption call for the I-D
>draft-yegin-dmm-ondemand-mobility-03
> to confirm its adoption as a DMM WG documen
Hi Jouni, all,
I don't have major comments to the charter (though I'll try to perform a
careful reading later on). However, I'm very interested in participate
in the work ahead on DMM, and therefore I'd like to participate in the
telcos where the structuring will be discussed.
I'll be off on holi
gt; >
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Alper
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Jun 4, 2014, at 12:04 PM, Dapeng Liu wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
Same here.
Carlos
On Sat, 2014-05-31 at 10:05 +, karag...@cs.utwente.nl wrote:
> Hi Danny, Hi all,
>
>
>
> Yes, I am getting the same indication and I cannot vote!
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Georgios
>
>
>
>
> __
> V
Hi guys,
We are happy to announce the public release of Open DMM, a platform
meant to host open source DMM implementations and related efforts.
You can go to our web site and start enjoying from real DMM code :D
http://odmm.net/
So far, a network-based DMM solution is available (the one used in
Hi Marco,
Thanks for the discussion. Please see inline below.
On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 11:59 +, Marco Liebsch wrote:
> Please see inline, Carlos.
>
> >-Original Message-----
> >From: Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano [mailto:c...@it.uc3m.es]
> >Sent: Mittwoch, 13. N
o enable all models, we should converge on a reasonable
> set of first work items to allow operators to enable DMM in their network.
I agree. It would be helpful to get some feedback from operators on
which deployments they have more interest on.
Thanks,
Carlos
>
> marco
>
>
>
Hi,
I'm also jumping into the discussion a bit late.
Without going into all the detailed discussions that have taken place
recently, I just want to share my view on the MIP-based vs routing-based
approach.
IMHO, we probably need to further look at both approaches in this group,
but with enough e
Hi Jouni,
Thanks for your review and comments. Please see some comments from us
inline below.
On Sat, 2013-10-26 at 21:43 +0300, Jouni wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I did some brief reading on the -02 version (mainly to trigger even
> some discussion!). Here are my initial comments.
>
> I am quite please
Dear chairs,
We have been working on an update of draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis,
addressing the comments received on the mailing list and during the last
meeting. Main changes from -02 are:
- New section on 3GPP mobility.
- New section on functional analysis.
- New section on combined solution an
lse is unauthorised. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the
> sender by return e-mail, Thanks.
>
--
Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano http://www.netcom.it.uc3m.es/
GPG FP: D29B 0A6A 639A A56
list.
We look forward to your new comments and reviews.
Best regards,
Juan-Carlos, Carlos, Telemaco and Charlie
--
Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano http://www.netcom.it.uc3m.es/
GPG FP: D29B 0A6A 639A A561 93CA 4D55 35DC BA4D D170 4F67
--- Begin Message ---
A New Internet-Draft is available
ien
> ___
> dmm mailing list
> dmm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
--
Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano http://www.netcoms.net
GPG FP: D29B 0A6A 639A A561 93CA 4D55 35DC BA4D D170 4F67
+++
a legacy IPv6 mobile node (a netbook).
Looking forward to seeing you there and getting your feedback.
Thanks,
Carlos, Telemaco and Juan Carlos
[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bernardos-dmm-pmip-01
[2]
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bernardos-dmm-distributed-anchoring-00
--
Carlos J
Thanks,
Carlos
>
> BR,
> Rute Sofia
>
> On 03/27/2012 04:34 PM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We'd like to announce that our network-based DMM demo will take place on
> > Thursday at 15:30 in room 251.
> >
> > The dem
; > camera) and a legacy IPv6 mobile node (a netbook).
> >
> > Looking forward to seeing you there and getting your feedback.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Carlos, Telemaco and Juan Carlos
> >
> > [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-berna
here and getting your feedback.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Carlos, Telemaco and Juan Carlos
>
> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bernardos-dmm-pmip-01
> [2]
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bernardos-dmm-distributed-anchoring-00
> --
> Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano http://www.netco
ttp://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bernardos-dmm-distributed-anchoring-00
--
Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano http://www.netcom.it.uc3m.es/
GPG FP: D29B 0A6A 639A A561 93CA 4D55 35DC BA4D D170 4F67
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Hi Behcet,
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 11:13 -0500, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
> wrote:
> > Hi Behcet,
> >
> > On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 11:06 -0500, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
> >> Hi Carlos,
Hi Pete,
Comments inline below...
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 14:38 +, Peter McCann wrote:
> Hi, Carlos,
>
> Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano wrote:
> > Hi Pete,
> >
> > Sorry for the late reply. Please see inline below.
> >
> > On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 18:58 +00
etwork-based protocol and the solution is specified in the
draft for PMIPv6. Not sure what your doubt comes from...
>
> Please see below.
Please see my comment inline below.
>
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 3:49 AM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
> wrote:
> > Hi Luowen,
> >
> &
Hi Marco,
Thanks for your comment. Please see inline below.
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 10:00 +, Marco Liebsch wrote:
> Carlos,
> thanks for your feedback. Please see inline.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano [mailto:c...@it.uc3m.es]
-bernardos-dmm-distributed-anchoring
We will try to make the demo after DMM session (we need to check with
the DMM WG chairs, the ADs and the Secretariat). We'll announce the full
details in proper time.
Kind Regards,
Carlos et al.
--
Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano http://www.netcom.it.uc3m.es/
G
be able to survive
to an IP address change).
Thanks,
Carlos
>
> What do you think?
>
> Thanks,
> marco
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dmm-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> > Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
> &
-GW3, it is as a new router got attached to the link
(no configuration step required by the MN).
Thanks,
Carlos
>
> What do you think?
>
> BR
> Luowen
--
Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano http://www.netcom.it.uc3m.es/
GPG FP: D29B 0A6A 639A A561 93CA 4D55 35DC BA4D D170 4F67
signatu
Hi Pete,
Sorry for the late reply. Please see inline below.
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 18:58 +, Peter McCann wrote:
> Hi, Carlos,
>
> Just a couple of response points below...
>
> Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano wrote:
> > Hi Pete,
> >
> > Thanks for the comments
; case and could be solved with a single mechanism.
Client-based DMM is a topic that deserves additional attention. In our
draft we have started to look at a network-based solution, but we can
discuss the implications of a client-based solution as well.
>
> Looking forward to continued discu
draft-bernardos-dmm-distributed-anchoring-00.txt
Thanks,
Carlos
--
Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano http://www.netcom.it.uc3m.es/
GPG FP: D29B 0A6A 639A A561 93CA 4D55 35DC BA4D D170 4F67
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
__
53 matches
Mail list logo