Hi Alex,
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:alexandru.petre...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 8:53 AM
> To: Templin, Fred L; Tony Hain; 'Jouni Korhonen'; dmm@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not /64s
&g
x27;; dmm@ietf.org Subject: Re:
[DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not /64s
Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
Le 11/06/2015 18:02, Jouni Korhonen a écrit :
6/4/2015, 7:08 AM, Alexandru Petrescu kirjoitti:
Le 04/06/2015 05:42, Templin, Fred L a écrit :
Hi Alex,
-Original Message
Hi Alex,
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:alexandru.petre...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 6:03 AM
> To: Templin, Fred L; Tony Hain; 'Jouni Korhonen'; dmm@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not /64s
&g
ilto:alexandru.petre...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday,
June 03, 2015 8:36 AM To: Templin, Fred L; Satoru
Matsushima Cc: dmm Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04
- /62s to UE, not /64s
Le 29/05/2015 20:21, Templin, Fred L a écrit :
Hi Alex,
-Original Message- From: dmm
[mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On
--Original Message-
From: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:alexandru.petre...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 8:36 AM
To: Templin, Fred L; Satoru Matsushima
Cc: dmm
Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not /64s
Le 29/05/2015 20:21, Templin, Fred L a écrit :
Hi Alex,
---
For lack of a better description, the cellular side of businesses suffer
> from "bell head:" thinking, where the UE is an application endpoint.
> Nothing more occurs to them, because that is the product they have always
> supported. A routing function implies higher aggregate data rates than they
>
Responding to two in one:
> -Original Message-
> From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tony Hain
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 9:47 AM
> To: 'Alexandru Petrescu'; 'Jouni Korhonen'; dmm@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 -
Message-
> >>>> From: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:alexandru.petre...@gmail.com]
> >>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 8:36 AM
> >>>> To: Templin, Fred L; Satoru Matsushima
> >>>> Cc: dmm
> >>>> Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc d
: Templin, Fred L; Satoru Matsushima
Cc: dmm
Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not /64s
Le 29/05/2015 20:21, Templin, Fred L a écrit :
Hi Alex,
-Original Message-
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexandru
Petrescu
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 10:59 AM
To
: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not /64s
Le 29/05/2015 20:21, Templin, Fred L a écrit :
Hi Alex,
-Original Message-
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexandru
Petrescu
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 10:59 AM
To: Satoru Matsushima
Cc: dmm
Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc
Hi Alex,
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:alexandru.petre...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 7:58 AM
> To: Templin, Fred L; Satoru Matsushima
> Cc: dmm
> Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not /64s
>
> Fred,
Fred,
Le 08/06/2015 19:08, Templin, Fred L a écrit :
[...]
The common thinking at operators and advisers is still that a
/64 should be given to an User Equipment.
This must change: the 3GPP specs and operator deployments must
give /62 to UEs, and not /64.
Why not a /N instead of just a /62 o
Hi Alex,
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:alexandru.petre...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 9:43 AM
> To: Templin, Fred L; Satoru Matsushima
> Cc: dmm
> Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not /64s
>
> Hi Fred,
, not /64s
Le 04/06/2015 05:42, Templin, Fred L a écrit :
Hi Alex,
-Original Message- From: Alexandru Petrescu
[mailto:alexandru.petre...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June
03, 2015 8:36 AM To: Templin, Fred L; Satoru Matsushima Cc: dmm
Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not
Hi Alex,
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:alexandru.petre...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 7:09 AM
> To: Templin, Fred L; Satoru Matsushima
> Cc: dmm
> Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not /64s
>
> Le 04/06/2
Le 04/06/2015 05:42, Templin, Fred L a écrit :
Hi Alex,
-Original Message-
From: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:alexandru.petre...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 8:36 AM
To: Templin, Fred L; Satoru Matsushima
Cc: dmm
Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not /64s
Hi Alex,
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:alexandru.petre...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 8:36 AM
> To: Templin, Fred L; Satoru Matsushima
> Cc: dmm
> Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not /64s
>
> Le 29/05/2
Le 29/05/2015 20:21, Templin, Fred L a écrit :
Hi Alex,
-Original Message-
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexandru Petrescu
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 10:59 AM
To: Satoru Matsushima
Cc: dmm
Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not /64s
Le 29/05
Hi Alex,
> -Original Message-
> From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexandru Petrescu
> Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 10:59 AM
> To: Satoru Matsushima
> Cc: dmm
> Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not /64s
>
> Le 29/05/2015 15
Le 29/05/2015 15:30, Satoru Matsushima a écrit :
Ah OK. thanks.
Slightly off-topic, I think that there is still chance for tethering
with single /64 if it is allocated as a off-link prefix.
Yes, there is still such a chance. But it can not tether more than one
single subnet. Connected vehicl
Ah OK. thanks.
Slightly off-topic, I think that there is still chance for tethering with
single /64 if it is allocated as a off-link prefix.
But yes, I agree with you.
cheers,
--satoru
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Alexandru Petrescu <
alexandru.petre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In additi
Hi,
In addition to what Behcet says.
I read the example below. I think it is just an example, but just to
make sure.
Please - do not allocate /64s to end users in a cellular network.
Allocate at least /62s to end users.
This is to allow the smartphone to perform tethering (small network o
22 matches
Mail list logo
