On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 12:23:59 +1100
Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote:
> Hmm, I understood
>
> http://www.trek.eu.org/devel/sysd2v/sysd2v-0.2.sh
>
> to be the code,
Yep, that's it, and the code looks pretty good to me. And it looks very
useful for what we've been discussing. Thanks Ralph!!!
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 20:35:42 -0600
goli...@devuan.org wrote:
> Even though I agree that we should never have been forced to reinvent
> a wheel that wasn't broken, I have no problem with co-existence. But
> the systemd cabal might not want to share. Will be interesting to see
> if at some point
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 15:48:13 +0100, Stephane wrote in message
<1179-8fb9-d4ad-4d34-70ad26abf...@univ-paris1.fr>:
> > .nope, dunno those .eml files, only tried this with digests, and you
> > wanna do one at the time even in scripts to avoid messing up your
> > email archive with malformed
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 08:35:42PM -0600, goli...@devuan.org wrote:
> Even though I agree that we should never have been forced to reinvent a
> wheel that wasn't broken, I have no problem with co-existence. But the
> systemd cabal might not want to share. Will be interesting to see if at some
>
Even though I agree that we should never have been forced to reinvent a
wheel that wasn't broken, I have no problem with co-existence. But the
systemd cabal might not want to share. Will be interesting to see if at
some point those unit files are locked down in a way that prevents the
Hello DNG!
First time posting, so please let me know if I'm missing some
formalities.
I'm currently running up-to-date ASCII with ZFS on root. I'm attempting
to update ZFS from backports 0.7.12-1 to 0.7.12.2 but zfsutils-linux
does not resolve dependencies and thus prevents the update. Here's
Hmm, I understood
http://www.trek.eu.org/devel/sysd2v/sysd2v-0.2.sh
to be the code, and that it's about to be included in the sysvinit package.
If it works well enough, it'll be a handy tool for init script writers, even
though it implicitly validates the existence of something the world
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 13:28:00 -0500
"Ismael L. Donis Garcia" wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From:
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 1:18 PM
> Subject: Re: [DNG] Formail for managing digests
>
>
> > More fiddling while Rome burns . . . sigh . . .
> >
> > I'm in a bit of a
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 12:18:55 -0600
goli...@devuan.org wrote:
> More fiddling while Rome burns . . . sigh . . .
>
> I'm in a bit of a mood because I thought that a script to convert
> systemd units to init style shell scripts would be worthy of at least
> some discussion.
>
> golinux
Well
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 12:20:36 +0200
Dimitris via Dng wrote:
> On 11/27/19 11:55 AM, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > ..act on it.
>
> 20years using email, i've roughly seen ~10 replies by digest readers.
> and as i already said i don't care about it, nor do i think it needs
> action from devuan side.
>
il devuanizzato Joril via Dng il 27-11-19 09:01:37 ha
scritto:
On 26/11/19 22:13, viverna wrote:
I wrote this summer in this list about a possibility of inject init
run scripts (for example runit) in all Devuan packages automatically.
This is a great idea. I've been in favor of something
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 1:18 PM
Subject: Re: [DNG] Formail for managing digests
More fiddling while Rome burns . . . sigh . . .
I'm in a bit of a mood because I thought that a script to convert systemd
units to init style shell scripts
More fiddling while Rome burns . . . sigh . . .
I'm in a bit of a mood because I thought that a script to convert
systemd units to init style shell scripts would be worthy of at least
some discussion.
golinux
___
Dng mailing list
think that digest as a method of mail group delivery should be dead
Sympa can be set to generate digests as a compilation of individual
mails, joined via Mime. So if you do the things right, you can answer
the mail with its headers.
--
Sincerely, Stephane Ascoet
.nope, dunno those .eml files, only tried this with digests, and you
wanna do one at the time even in scripts to avoid messing up your email
archive with malformed messages lurking in your digests.
DIGEST="Dng Digest, Vol 62, Issue 31.eml" ; cat "$DIGEST" |formail -ds
or
DIGEST="Dng Digest, Vol
Le 27/11/2019 à 11:20, Dimitris via Dng a écrit :
On 11/27/19 11:55 AM, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..act on it.
20years using email, i've roughly seen ~10 replies by digest readers.
and as i already said i don't care about it, nor do i think it needs
action from devuan side.
those who do care (there
On 11/27/19 11:55 AM, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> ..act on it.
20years using email, i've roughly seen ~10 replies by digest readers.
and as i already said i don't care about it, nor do i think it needs
action from devuan side.
those who do care (there seem to be a few so far making it a "hot"
Possibly things go better if you create the build/pool directory by hand.
It's unclear to me how you got the situation of an x86.cfg using util/get-dist
without also having a build/pool directory, but I may well have messed it up
(although I tried staying on "my" branch(es) -- note that the
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 08:38:37 +, Dimitris wrote in message
:
> People who use digest mode usually don't care to participate to
> discussions.. They just want "briefing".. so why bother with people
> habbits and not concentrate on the project?
..I'm spoiled, IME from mail lists on
On 2019-11-27 11:24:20, Dimitris via Dng wrote:
> On 11/27/19 11:14 AM, m_ma...@web.de wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > can you please take a look to the servers configuration, i become errors
> > if i try test_rewrite.sh:
>
> this was already reported to mirror@d.o. it's not new..
> nothing
below are changes i did a couple of months ago to make the script work..
maybe the versions are changed again, so do check the repo versions to
make sure, and manually edit those in the script..
# diff test_rewrite.sh test_rewrite_new.sh
65,66c65,66
<
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 09:42:41 +0100, Stephane wrote in message
<6dc8e46d-4448-adcc-dc98-943226524...@univ-paris1.fr>:
> Arnt Karlsen:
>
> > ..you can't (AFAIK), you do it outside your MUA, with e.g.:
> > 'cat $DIGEST |formail +1 -ds procmail '
>
> HI, yes, it was clear that it couldn't be
> nothing important really, it's just that the script is looking for older
> packages, that don't exist in repo anymore.. just needs updating...
>
> d.
sorry Dimitris, i think it is imortant, i can not build a netinstall package
for my cluster installation any more.
The make can not find the
On 11/27/19 11:14 AM, m_ma...@web.de wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> can you please take a look to the servers configuration, i become errors if i
> try test_rewrite.sh:
this was already reported to mirror@d.o. it's not new..
nothing important really, it's just that the script is looking for older
Dear all,
can you please take a look to the servers configuration, i become errors if i
try test_rewrite.sh:
Using /usr/bin/curl -- AS_HOST:
Trying DEVUAN package
(http://pkgmaster.devuan.org/merged/pool/DEVUAN/main/b/base-files/base-files_8+devuan7_amd64.deb)...ret:
0
[OK]
Trying DEBIAN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 27/11/19 7:42 pm, Stephane Ascoet wrote:
> Arnt Karlsen:
>
>> ..you can't (AFAIK), you do it outside your MUA, with e.g.: 'cat
>> $DIGEST |formail +1 -ds procmail '
>
> HI, yes, it was clear that it couldn't be done graphically in
>
Arnt Karlsen:
..you can't (AFAIK), you do it outside your MUA, with e.g.:
'cat $DIGEST |formail +1 -ds procmail '
HI, yes, it was clear that it couldn't be done graphically in
Thunderbird. The first thing I don't understand is what I must have
behind $DIGEST? The digest saved as an .eml
People who use digest mode usually don't care to participate to discussions..
They just want "briefing".. so why bother with people habbits and not
concentrate on the project?
tbh, i find this conversation distracting. Maybe submitting a wishlist(?) bug
in mailing list projects is more
xunilog just posted something on the forum that pointed to this from
Jessie Smith. Sounds like good news to me that opens all sorts of
possibilities. :D
golinux
===
https://www.patreon.com/posts/31633933
Nov 17 at 10:29am
Converting systemd units to
On 26/11/19 22:13, viverna wrote:
I wrote this summer in this list about a possibility of inject init
run scripts (for example runit) in all Devuan packages automatically.
This is a great idea. I've been in favor of something similar since
2015. It frees "upstreams" from the responsibility of
30 matches
Mail list logo
