Re: [Dng] Too many man pages, too much complicated : systemd

2015-04-06 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Sonntag, 5. April 2015, 18:37:23 schrieb T.J. Duchene: -Original Message- From: Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI [mailto:ren...@olgiati-in-paraguay.org] Sent: Saturday, April 4, 2015 5:34 PM To: dng@lists.dyne.org Subject: Re: [Dng] Too many man pages, too much complicated : systemd

Re: [Dng] Too many man pages, too much complicated : systemd

2015-04-06 Thread T.J. Duchene
-Original Message- From: Jaromil [mailto:jaro...@dyne.org] Sent: Monday, April 6, 2015 2:28 AM To: T.J. Duchene; dng@lists.dyne.org Subject: Re: [Dng] Too many man pages, too much complicated : systemd hi T.J. On 6 April 2015 01:37:23 CEST, T.J. Duchene t.j.duch...@gmail.com

Re: [Dng] Too many man pages, too much complicated : systemd

2015-04-06 Thread Jude Nelson
Should have said in the earlier email: the list of contributors I gave earlier is definitely not all-encompassing, nor was it meant to be (I was trying to give an example of other people working towards a systemd-free future, and those were the first few people that came to mind). This is why a

Re: [Dng] Too many man pages, too much complicated : systemd

2015-04-06 Thread Apollia
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 4:50 PM, T.J. Duchene t.j.duch...@gmail.com wrote: What really puzzles me is why if you love systemd that much you just continue arguing about systemd on the ML of a Debian fork specifically born to throw systemd away. Do you think you might be able to convince us

Re: [Dng] Too many man pages, too much complicated : systemd

2015-04-06 Thread hellekin
On 04/06/2015 04:23 PM, Jude Nelson wrote: Second, I can't take all the credit :) Besides the VUA collective (Jaromil, Nextime, Hellekin, and others?), there's also: *** I'm not VUA. They are genuine spaghetti-raised Italians, I'm just an exiled Piemontese from the XVth Century. I can

Re: [Dng] Too many man pages, too much complicated : systemd

2015-04-06 Thread Martijn Dekkers
What really puzzles me is why if you love systemd that much you just continue arguing about systemd on the ML of a Debian fork specifically born to throw systemd away. Do you think you might be able to convince us that systemd is *good* and *beautiful* and *necessary*? I don't want to be

Re: [Dng] Too many man pages, too much complicated : systemd

2015-04-06 Thread KatolaZ
On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 11:46:45AM +0300, Martijn Dekkers wrote: What really puzzles me is why if you love systemd that much you just continue arguing about systemd on the ML of a Debian fork specifically born to throw systemd away. Do you think you might be able to convince us that

Re: [Dng] Too many man pages, too much complicated : systemd

2015-04-06 Thread Joerg Reisenweber
On Mon 06 April 2015 10:06:49 KatolaZ wrote: On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 11:46:45AM +0300, Martijn Dekkers wrote: What really puzzles me is why if you love systemd that much you just continue arguing about systemd on the ML of a Debian fork specifically born to throw systemd away. Do you

Re: [Dng] Too many man pages, too much complicated : systemd

2015-04-06 Thread Steve Litt
On Mon, 6 Apr 2015 11:46:45 +0300 Martijn Dekkers devuan-li...@dekkers.org.uk wrote: What really puzzles me is why if you love systemd that much you just continue arguing about systemd on the ML of a Debian fork specifically born to throw systemd away. Do you think you might be able to

Re: [Dng] Too many man pages, too much complicated : systemd

2015-04-06 Thread Joerg Reisenweber
On Mon 06 April 2015 11:01:10 Steve Litt wrote: On Mon, 06 Apr 2015 11:24:54 +0200 Joerg Reisenweber reisenwe...@web.de wrote: Please by all means avoid friendly fire towards shots you hear in front of you - it's not the enemy, it's just your peers, we're all looking (and fighting) same

Re: [Dng] Too many man pages, too much complicated : systemd

2015-04-06 Thread Martijn Dekkers
When the organization has made a foundational policy decision, so they can move forward and implement that policy, yet somebody keeps trying to open up that policy to further debate, is that somebody's fire really friendly? Are they looking and fighting in the same direction, or are they

Re: [Dng] Too many man pages, too much complicated : systemd

2015-04-05 Thread Jude Nelson
: -Original Message- From: Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI [mailto:ren...@olgiati-in-paraguay.org] Sent: Saturday, April 4, 2015 5:34 PM To: dng@lists.dyne.org Subject: Re: [Dng] Too many man pages, too much complicated : systemd On Sun, 05 Apr 2015 00:11:55 +0200 toto titi voidtothete

Re: [Dng] Too many man pages, too much complicated : systemd

2015-04-05 Thread T.J. Duchene
-Original Message- From: Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI [mailto:ren...@olgiati-in-paraguay.org] Sent: Saturday, April 4, 2015 5:34 PM To: dng@lists.dyne.org Subject: Re: [Dng] Too many man pages, too much complicated : systemd On Sun, 05 Apr 2015 00:11:55 +0200 toto titi voidtothete

Re: [Dng] Too many man pages, too much complicated : systemd

2015-04-04 Thread Ron
On Sun, 05 Apr 2015 00:11:55 +0200 toto titi voidtothete...@gmail.com wrote: Nearly as complex as a Microsoft operating system, look at that : http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/ Please, Sir, could we have a registry ? Cheers, Ron. -- No Husband Has Ever Been