> When the organization has made a foundational policy decision, so they > can move forward and implement that policy, yet somebody keeps trying > to open up that policy to further debate, is that somebody's fire > really friendly? Are they looking and fighting in the same direction, > or are they deliberately retarding progress in that direction? >
man, this is just getting depressing... I don't see anybody "trying to open a policy to further debate" I just see a frank and open discussion of a topic that is one way or the other important to all of us. What I am also seeing is that "open debate" is actively discouraged by some people on this list.
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
