On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 04:50:04PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> My desktop/server runs as a web server, it serves the domain zbmc.eu.
>
> It's set up so that local client requests for web pages from zbmc.eu go
> 'out and back' as it were, this way I can be more certain
My desktop/server runs as a web server, it serves the domain zbmc.eu.
It's set up so that local client requests for web pages from zbmc.eu go
'out and back' as it were, this way I can be more certain that web pages
that work locally also work when accessed from outside.
However sometimes I notice
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 04:18:27PM -0500, Frederick C. Damen wrote:
> I suspect you may find the cause of your issue to do with the fact that
> ping resolves names with resources, i.e. files etc, local to the machine
> before finding a DNS server to resolve the name. Dig I am lead to
> believe
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 07:19:22PM +, Chris G wrote:
[snip]
Well I've fixed the basic problem, I've uninstalled Network Manager and
installed wicd instead, now my /etc/hosts is left alone and so the
immediate problem is solved.
However I'd still like an answer to the
I have a small SoHo LAN on which I run dnsmasq 2.52 on one of the
machines (dps, 192.168.1.2) to provide DHCP and DNS. There are some
static IP addresses on the LAN and thus the /etc/hosts on the machine
where dnsmasq runs is as follows:-
127.0.0.1 localhost
# The following lines a
I get a very odd result in response to the 'host' command for just *one*
computer on my LAN, see the result for 'oldchris' below:-
chris$ host chris.zbmc.eu
chris.zbmc.eu has address 192.168.1.4
chris$ host dps.zbmc.eu
dps.zbmc.eu has address 192.168.1.2
chris$ host oldchris.zb
I guess this isn't wholly a dnsmasq question but dnsmasq can probably
provide what I need to do it.
I'm running dnsmasq on a small server which provides DNS (and some other
services) for our small (one user most of the time, sometimes two) SoHo LAN.
I'm doing some development work which involves
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 03:15:08PM -0500, John R. Graham wrote:
> Most of these little Linksys devices are capable of getting an IP address via
> DHCP from dnsmasq but none of them (that I have tried) seem capable of
> delivering their host name to dnsmasq as all of my Linux and Windows boxen
>
I run a small SoHo network behind a NAT router, all pretty conventional,
nearly all the machines run either Ubuntu Server 10.04 or Xubuntu 10.04.
I run dnsmasq on one of the server machines (called dps - for DNS and
Print Server) to provide DNS and DHCP for the network.
I recently had a problem w
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 06:57:32PM -0600, richardvo...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
> > Chris G wrote:
> >> On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 08:16:42PM +, Simon Kelley wrote:
> >>> Chris G wrote:
> >>>> I have a dn
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 08:16:42PM +, Simon Kelley wrote:
> Chris G wrote:
> > I have a dnsmasq.conf file with the following at the end:-
> >
> > dhcp-host=chris,192.168.1.4
> >
> > How do I get 192.168.1.4 to have some other names as well
I have a dnsmasq.conf file with the following at the end:-
dhcp-host=chris,192.168.1.4
How do I get 192.168.1.4 to have some other names as well (for apache2
virtual hosting)?
--
Chris Green
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 01:58:25PM +, Chris G wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 10:25:11AM -0500, Perette Barella wrote:
> > It looks like your provider has set up a wildcard A record, which is
> > similar to DNS hijacking as a "helpful" feature to users who miskey a
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 10:25:11AM -0500, Perette Barella wrote:
> It looks like your provider has set up a wildcard A record, which is
> similar to DNS hijacking as a "helpful" feature to users who miskey a
> domain name. It's not isolated to you:
>
> mugenshi:etc x10$ host ghijk.isbd.net
>
I have dnsmasq working quite happily on a Ubuntu Server 9.10 system
providing dns for my small SoHo network.
I have just noticed however that if I ask for the address of a
non-existent name dnsmasq returns the name of one of my hosting
service's machines. It always returns the same address for an
I have just moved my dnsmasq server from my desktop machine to a much
lower powered machine so I can turn my desktop off and save some
electricity.
The new machine is called 'server' (original eh!) and has a static
address of 192.168.1.2. It had a totally unmodified installation of
Ubuntu Server
I just noticed that ubuntu says:-
Suggested packages:
resolvconf
when I install dnsmasq. So, should I install resolvconf and will it
do me any good?
--
Chris Green
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:12:09PM -0500, richardvo...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 2:33 AM, Nagy Péter wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have a small network at home, and it works well locally. But now, I
> > should like to look out of the world.
> >
> > I got a dynamic address from my I
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 08:59:54PM +0100, Simon Kelley wrote:
> Chris G wrote:
> >
> >> There are ways around this, but we need to know exactly what's going on
> >> first.
> >>
> > Thanks for all the help so far. Yes, I think mDNS may be
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 08:46:01PM +0100, Simon Kelley wrote:
> Chris G wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 05:51:15PM +0100, Simon Kelley wrote:
> >> Chris G wrote:
> >>> Can dnsmasq provide an alternative name for a client?
> >>>
> >>> This
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 05:51:15PM +0100, Simon Kelley wrote:
> Chris G wrote:
> > Can dnsmasq provide an alternative name for a client?
> >
> > This is going on from my problem with a system that insists on calling
> > itself garage.local when I want it to be called
f Bonjour, Avahi, or other
> Multicast DNS software is used in conjunction with a network that
> implements the local toplevel DNS domain."
> [Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.local]
>
My *network* does nothing of the sort, it has a proper registered TLD.
> B
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 05:51:15PM +0100, Simon Kelley wrote:
> Chris G wrote:
> > Can dnsmasq provide an alternative name for a client?
> >
> > This is going on from my problem with a system that insists on calling
> > itself garage.local when I want it to be called
Can dnsmasq provide an alternative name for a client?
This is going on from my problem with a system that insists on calling
itself garage.local when I want it to be called garage.
Is there a way that I can tell dnsmasq that garage.local is also
garage so that requests for the address of garage w
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 05:44:33PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> I have dnsmasq running with a fairly basic configuration but (among
> other things) it does have:-
>
> expand-hosts
> domain=isbd.net
>
> Two clients do as I expected and their host names h
I have dnsmasq running with a fairly basic configuration but (among
other things) it does have:-
expand-hosts
domain=isbd.net
Two clients do as I expected and their host names have isbd.net appended:-
maxine.isbd.net ether 00:50:8d:93:fd:09 Ceth0
C475
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:09:46PM -0700, JD wrote:
>
>
> On 08/20/2009 05:32 PM, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
> > JD (jd1...@gmail.com) wrote on 20 August 2009 15:01:
> > >
> > >On 08/20/2009 02:43 PM, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
> > >> Chris G
I'm pretty sure dnsmasq can do what I want but I'd just like to
confirm the details of how to do it.
I want dnsmasq to set default routes for DHCP clients, so I need to
use --dhcp-option, so far so good. However the extra bit I'm not
quite clear about is that I want to set different default route
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 06:55:42AM -0400, richardvo...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I have added:-
> >
> > address=/www.google-analytics.com/127.0.0.1
> >
> > to the end of /etc/dnsmasq.conf and done 'kill -SIGHUP ', no
> > change, I still get the aliases appearing.
>
> JD posted the appropriate ex
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 04:17:17PM +0930, Karl Goetz wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:58:05 +0100
> Chris G wrote:
>
> > I run a fairly default version of dnsmasq on my xubuntu 9.04 Linux box
> > so that I don't have to maintain losts of network (or hosts)
> > c
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 04:17:17PM +0930, Karl Goetz wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:58:05 +0100
> Chris G wrote:
>
> > I run a fairly default version of dnsmasq on my xubuntu 9.04 Linux box
> > so that I don't have to maintain losts of network (or hosts)
> > c
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 01:30:20PM -0400, richardvo...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Chris G wrote:
> > I run a fairly default version of dnsmasq on my xubuntu 9.04 Linux box
> > so that I don't have to maintain losts of network (or hosts)
> >
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 03:58:05PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> I run a fairly default version of dnsmasq on my xubuntu 9.04 Linux box
> so that I don't have to maintain losts of network (or hosts)
> configurations around our network.
>
Oh dear, "udnerstand", "losts&quo
I run a fairly default version of dnsmasq on my xubuntu 9.04 Linux box
so that I don't have to maintain losts of network (or hosts)
configurations around our network.
I have just added:-
127.0.0.1 www.google-analytics.com ssl.www.google-analytics.com
to my /etc/hosts file. I'm not pa
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 09:42:00AM -0500, Jon Nelson wrote:
> I ran into a wacky problem today, and it *seems* to be dnsmasq's fault.
>
> Assume (at least) 2 machines: a firewall (running dnsmasq) and any other
> machine in the network (pointed at the firewall for name resolution).
>
> On the f
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 01:53:46AM +, richardvo...@gmail.com wrote:
> Please keep replies on the list.
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Chris Green wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 01:50:08AM +, richardvo...@gmail.com wrote:
> > [snip]
> >> >
> >> > No other configuration files nee
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 03:16:59PM +, Simon Kelley wrote:
> Chris G wrote:
>> I recently (a few weeks ago) installed dnsmasq on my xubuntu 8.10
>> system, it appears to work pretty well in general but a problem is
>> appearing which *seems* to be related to when I
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:11:10AM -0500, RevRagnarok wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Chris G <[1]c...@isbd.net> wrote:
>
> The problem is specific to my desktop machine (the xubuntu one) which
> is the one which is running dnsmasq. When a web
I recently (a few weeks ago) installed dnsmasq on my xubuntu 8.10
system, it appears to work pretty well in general but a problem is
appearing which *seems* to be related to when I started using dnsmasq.
What happens is that, occasionally, after accessing a particular web
site many times, access t
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 08:09:00AM +0100, Helmut Hullen wrote:
> Hallo, Paul,
>
> Du meintest am 23.01.09:
>
> > Fedora RPMs have located dnsmasq.leases in /var/lib/dnsmasq/ in the
> > past. Don't know if they still are, more recently I've been building
> > from Simon's tarballs to help test the
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 08:27:00PM -0500, Cristóbal Palmer wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Chris G wrote:
> > Locate only works after the overnight update though, not much use
> > after you've just installed dnsmasq.
>
> See updatedb(1) [updatedb.slocate] - u
eys.org.uk
> > Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] How to get name of DHCP'ed system?
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 16:29 +, Chris G wrote:
> > >> Where is dhcp.leases? I've looked in the obviou
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:18:48PM -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 16:29 +0000, Chris G wrote:
> > Where is dhcp.leases? I've looked in the obvious places and can't see
> > it, a quick Google suggests it should be /var/dhcp.leases but I
> > haven
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:12:30AM -0600, richardvo...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Chris G wrote:
> > I have just moved fully to using dnsmasq on my xubuntu 8.10 system,
> > it's made things much simpler than they were. I have removed all my
> &
I have just moved fully to using dnsmasq on my xubuntu 8.10 system,
it's made things much simpler than they were. I have removed all my
manually added entries for static IP hosts on the LAN from /etc/hosts
and I've "un static IP'ed" them - dnsmasq does it all for me.
However I have one issue, I h
45 matches
Mail list logo
