ther research in parallel of waiting on
response from the community, report progress.
A true "Thanks" will be sharing the solution or a workaround.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
; > no-dhcp-interface=wan
> > no-resolv
> > port=1053
> > rebind-localhost-ok
> > server=8.8.8.8
> > stop-dns-rebind
>
> Forgot to mention, I use dnsmasq 2.90 on linux.
>
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
out/flushed because
> the REFUSED reply lasted much longer than 40s(the timeout in source code)
> while no request going in for that period.
>
Please try again to explain "the problem". Start with describe how to
reproduce. Add "Expected to see" and "Actual
On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 10:55:44PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 04:58:04PM +0100, Simon Kelley wrote:
>
> >
> > I'll commit that change as soon as I've sent this.
> >
>
> That became commit f006be784210. It is the f
of the
record is given by the hex data, which may
be of the form 01:23:45 or 01 23 45 or
012345 or any mixture of these.
If there are better ways to define NS records, I would love
to learn about it.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 05:24:54PM +, Roger Lucas via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
> From: Dnsmasq-discuss on behalf of Geert Stappers:
> Sent: 14 October 2024 16:26
> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 10:13:05AM +, Roger Lucas via Dnsmasq-discuss
> > wrote:
> > >
> > &
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 06:21:40PM +0300, Leonid Evdokimov wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 10:18 PM Geert Stappers wrote:
> > To prevent the patches getting lost in the mailing list archive,
> > have I saved them in a local branch. What would be a good name for
> > that git
it to work.
As I see it, is the extension of the chain incomplete. [1]
With "chain" I mean chain of DNServers. With "extension" I mean
the insertion of a DNS in the chain.
> Thanks in advance for any suggestions!
Back to the drawing board, draw the chain on it.
Make a cut in the c
list archive,
have I saved them in a local branch. What would be a good name
for that git branch? My plan is to make the carrying git repository
public available.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
ee
them. And are willing to express that.
However, my fear is that there will be silence.
We will see happens next.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
Previous-Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Question on dnsmasq code, which may
occur a bad-free
Welcome back,
On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 04:58:04PM +0100, Simon Kelley wrote:
>
> I'll commit that change as soon as I've sent this.
>
That became commit f006be784210. It is the first commit in
s starting earlier, unless caching /etc/hosts is significant speedup.
> And we have nss-lookup.target, I am not sure if socket activated service cat
> make it started also.
> >
> > I really hope that socket-activation is considered, this would improve
> > dnsmasq's integra
Reflect outcome of discussion on mailinglist.
Removed reference to meanwhile removed KB, Knowledge Base, note.
---
src/dhcp.c | 6 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/dhcp.c b/src/dhcp.c
index b65facd..e34b292 100644
--- a/src/dhcp.c
+++ b/src/dhcp.c
@@ -824,8
On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 01:32:07AM +0200, Petr Menšík wrote:
> On 24/09/2024 08:52, Jan Ceuleers wrote:
> > ... context ...
>
> I have hit this comment once too.
Ah, the comment is what hits. That comment be changed
into something that hurts less.
_
.
Please Cc email address '~stappers/dnsmasqmlpc at
lists.sr.ht' on sending the v3 patch to get it at
https://lists.sr.ht/~stappers/dnsmasqmlpc/patches (mlpc:
mailinglistpatchcollector) for preventing that the patch falls through
the cracks.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is ha
emon->doing_ra)
That looks like a retransmit from April 2024.
It made it to the mailinglistpatchcollection, mlpc,
https://lists.sr.ht/~stappers/dnsmasqmlpc/patches/51909
When another retransmit a.k.a. reminder is needed,
please state something like "you might seen this before"
to
e client decide what it wants
> > to do rather than forcefully dropping the answers.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Rahul Thakur
> >
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> So what do you think of my reasoning for this patch? Do you agree?
Review the feedback
only UDP port 53 open.
> -- or how to fix.
Open TCP port 53 in the "firewall"
> Thanks.
A much better "Thanks" is reporting back.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
D
he feedback. The discussion has convinced me that the
> balance between risk and potential benefit is not favourable.
>
> I also take the point that making this special treatment configurable,
> while enabling the small benefits to be realised for those willing to
> take the
etion is being addressed with IPv6.
> But if the dnsmasq project isn't ready to remove this restriction, would
> a patch be accepted that makes it configurable? If so, what should the
> default be?
>
> Thanks, Jan
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 09:16:02AM +0200, Jan Ceuleers wrote:
> On 21/09/2024 09:29, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 07:22:35PM +0200, Jan Ceuleers wrote:
> > > Dear dnsmasq community,
> > >
> > > The changelog for
On Sat, Sep 21, 2024 at 01:53:59PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2024 at 07:08:45PM +0800, 胡义臻 wrote:
> > Are there any common test cases for dnsmasq?
> >
> > I found this test case on github, but it covered so little that I
> > wanted to find a compr
ems.
>
> https://github.com/InfrastructureServices/dnsmasq-tests
>
Yes, I would be good thing if dnsmasq gets test cases.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists
uot;first time right"). The "it works for me" reward can get as next
reward the warm feeling of "I was able to give back" [2].
> Many thanks, Jan
You are welcome [3]
Groeten
Geert Stappers
[1] I could not resist to ignore the posting,
hence te long "the post
On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 06:38:52PM +, Dan Schaper wrote:
> From Geert Stappers, Date 8/17/2024 11:05:25 AM
> > On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 11:25:04AM +0200, Dominik Derigs wrote:
> > > Hey Simon,
> > >
> > > another patch ...
> >
> > IMNSHO shou
On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 01:59:23PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 01, 2024 at 12:36:49AM +0200, Petr Menšík wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > As part of our review of dnsmasq code, our code scanning tools revealed few
> > warnings. Some of them are valid, although it
t;
>
> [image: Screenshot 2024-09-05 at 09.42.38.png]
> https://smirnov.la/Screenshot%202024-09-05%20at%2009.42.38.png
>
>
>
> I'm using these params
> https://github.com/dockur/dnsmasq/blob/master/entry.sh#L14
> plus "fast-dns-retry". Also tried adding &
ot-anchors/root-anchors.xml
>^^It
>
That feedback converted in a patch. In the mailinglist archive at
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2024q3/017720.html
and also at https://lists.sr.ht/~stappers/dnsmasqmlpc/patches/54886
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Sil
Some minor changes in comment lines
Reported-by: Gary R. Schmidt
---
trust-anchors.conf | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/trust-anchors.conf b/trust-anchors.conf
index 1a7de74..e8bacf4 100644
--- a/trust-anchors.conf
+++ b/trust-anchors.conf
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
From: Loganaden Velvindron
Signed-off-by: Loganaden Velvindron
Signed-off-by: Jaykishan Mutkawoa
---
trust-anchors.conf | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/trust-anchors.conf b/trust-anchors.conf
index 2a1e2a0..1a7de74 100644
--- a/trust-anchors.conf
+++ b/t
dnsmasq community and for a future version of
you in your current situation which has to start an email thread
with "There is some evidence on the Internet that dnsmasq doesn't play
well with docker".
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
::250:56ff:feb5:ee27/64 scope link proto kernel_ll
>valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>
> I guess it is most likely be down to the setup on the clients (openSUSE).
The 'UP' and 'LOWER_UP' in ''
says that the interface is up.
> But as I pl
ze all configured backend servers, so the query succeeds
> instead of fails like it does now.
For what it is worth: My gut feeling says the problem description is
incomplete.
> This is our dnsmasq.conf:
>
> all-servers
> clear-on-reload
> bind-interfaces
>
thanks
Idea for a better "Many thanks": Share with the mailinglist archive
feedback on the file contrib/conntrack/README like a "Works for me"
or even an addition as "Here a patch that documents my working use case".
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Sile
On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 11:25:04AM +0200, Dominik Derigs via Dnsmasq-discuss
wrote:
> Hey Simon,
>
> another patch ...
IMNSHO should we, this mailinglist, help Simon where we can. Insteadof
just pushing work towards Simon.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
P.S.
I understand that Domini
ts as DHCPv4 did.
>
Please try to understand https://cbea.ms/git-commit/
Groeten
Geert Stappers
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2024q3/017649.html
(increase patch survival chance)
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2023q3/017238.html
izeof(struct in_addr))];
> #endif
> char control6[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(struct in6_pktinfo))];
> - } control_u;
> + } control_u = { 0 };
>
>iov[0].iov_base = packet;
>iov[0].iov_len = len;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
FreeBSD, the file is /usr/local/etc/dnsmasq.conf ) (but see the
--conf-file and --conf-dir options.) The format of this file con-
sists of one option per line, exactly as the long options detailed
in the OPTIONS section but without the leading "--". Lines sta
t; + * happen as pheader should be strictly within header after current
> ansp */
> + if (!CHECK_LEN(header, ansp, plen, hlen))
> +return plen;
>/* must use memmove, may overlap */
>memmove(ansp, pheader, hlen);
>header->arcount = htons(1);
>
e data seamlessly. This is useful for creating
scripting interfaces to C/C++ libraries, or for connecting C/C++ code
with other software components written in different programming languages.
https://www.swig.org/
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
S
ource
> DE:AD:BE:EF:00:11 -j DROP
s/DROP/REJECT/ to get more as just silence when the limit kicks in.
And triple check the -m, all three.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
Hello,
For your information: FLOSS weekly had an interview
with Simon Kelley, the creator of dnsmasq:
https://hackaday.com/2024/03/27/floss-weekly-episode-776-dnsmasq-making-the-internet-work-since-1999/
Enjoy
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
rver IP to dnsmasq via the command line and does not provide
> any example of how to do so.
> I can't find an example of how to do so anywhere on the net...
>
Advice: Elaborate on the original problem.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
Hello Marek,
Hello Dnsmasq Mailinglist,
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 09:31:44PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> From: Marek Skrobacki via Dnsmasq-discuss
>
>
> If the DHCP server is running inside a container or behind a load
> balancer, the DHCPREQUEST arriving at dnsmasq for proc
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 11:00:17PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 09:40:17PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Another 17th of month, another attempt
> > to prevent that patches fall through the cracks.
:-)
> > At https://
From: Marek Skrobacki via Dnsmasq-discuss
If the DHCP server is running inside a container or behind a load
balancer, the DHCPREQUEST arriving at dnsmasq for processing may have a
Server ID (option 54) configured with an IP address that is not assigned
to the local interface. In this case, dnsma
e Coverity scan. 3
> small changes attached.
Most likely another reminder is needed. Upon "retransmit", please
CC ~stappers/dnsmasqm...@lists.sr.ht
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss
s no /etc/resolv.conf
> at all which, as I said, upsets some things. I want the local dnsmasq
> just to provide DNS cacheing in the system where it is running and
> nothing more, the 'upstream' DNS is provided by whatever
> /run/NetworkManager/no-stub-resolv.conf points at
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 09:40:17PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Another 17th of month, another attempt
> to prevent that patches fall through the cracks.
>
>
> At https://lists.sr.ht/~stappers/dnsmasqmlpc/patches
> is 1 pending patch, "Quieten DHCPv6 log w
From: Erik Karlsson
Not doing so can result in a use after free since the name for DHCP
derived DNS records is represented as a pointer into the DHCP lease
table. Update will only happen when necessary since lease_update_dns
tests internally on dns_dirty and the force argument is zero.
Signed-of
borate, make it possible to reproduce those tests.
> Looking forward to get feedback on this proposal.
Here **not** the project lead, just someone acknowledging
the patch has been seen.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsma
-+
| add | old | add | old | del |
+=+=+=+=+=+=+
mac_address | y | y | y | y | y |
client_address | y | y | | | | Either IPv4 addr or ?IPv6?
address
client_id | | | * | * | * | derived from MAC addr. Not
always present
lease_expires | | | y | y | y |
time_remaining | | | y | y | | If present, always '3600.0'
ip_address | | | y | y | y |
hostname| | | y | y | y |
domain | | | y | y | y |
interface | | | y | y | |
data_missing| | | y | y | | if present, always '1.0'
| | | | | |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+
--]]
> Many thanks,
> Phil
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
original packet. This should never
> + * happen as pheader should be strictly within header after current
> ansp */
> + if (!CHECK_LEN(header, ansp, plen, hlen))
> + return plen;
>/* must use memmove, may overlap */
>memmove(ansp, pheader, hlen);
&
mon->doing_ra)
> --
> 2.43.2
>
Looks good to me.
For preventing that the patch falls through the cracks,
send the patch to email address '~stappers/dnsmasqm...@lists.sr.ht'
to get it at https://lists.sr.ht/~stappers/dnsmasqmlpc/p
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 06:20:03AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 10:07:04PM -0400, Christopher Hill wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a question regarding if upstream DNS forwarding can be based on the
> > source interface? Reading the manual I d
10.0.2.1 via tun 2.
>
> I have considered running two instances (one bound to eth1 and another
> to eth2) but that duplicates setup and makes local queries across VLANs more
> complicated.
Read the dnsmasq manual and reread the dnsmasq manual.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is har
From: Olaf Hering
The make target 'install-common' expects results from the target 'all'.
A 'make -j install' may fail because both targets are brought
up-to-todate in parallel. As a result the final binary will not exist at
the time 'install-common' runs, because 'all' is not yet done.
Adjust t
some patches haven't yet
reached the "mailinglist patch collector". Such as "Fix dependency
in make install target". See email 2024-03-17.
Most likely more patches were missed / are missing
please resend them with Cc: ~stappers/dnsmasqm...@lists.sr.ht
Groeten
Geert Stapper
at original poster & I think that DDNS is,
are two different Dynamic Domain Name Servers.
> If I'm wrong and dnsmasq can be configured as a DDNS client and my google
> foo has been poo - can anyone give me a pointer to where I might find more
> information.
>
> Thanks folks
gitlab.com/8.8.8.8
combination. The second line is NOT needed.
The
> address=/#/0.0.0.0
is another configuration I don't get.
So I think there are two problems. One how to use # character for server.
The other one original poster having a hard time configuring dnsmasq
for their
records accurately on the lan. I think DNS Update could resolve this
> problem.
And even documented in RFC 1925.
> Any thoughts on reconsidering support for this protocol in dnsmasq?
Try to express were the complexity should be.
> Or other solutions?
>
>
pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2024q1/017464.html
and https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2024q1/017473.html
Patches being ignored happened before and most likely will happen again.
Hence my experiment with dnsmasqmlpc, dnsmasq mailing list patch
col
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 01:09:36PM -0400, Brian Haley wrote:
> Nak.
Acknowledge
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discus
Hello Olaf,
(Mailinglist in the Cc:)
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 10:59:29PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 12:02:53PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > The make target 'install-common' expects results from the target 'all'.
> > A 'make -j in
From: Ian Dall
When a DHCP range has a mode of "static" then the pool of dynamically
allocated address is configured to be of zero size. DHCPv6 will still
respond with statically defined addresses. In these cirumstances, not
allocating an address is expected behaviour and not an error, so allow
"
From: Brian Haley
When a new IPv6 address is being added to a dhcp_config
struct, if there is anything invalid regarding the prefix
it looks like there is a potential memory leak.
ret_err_free() should be used to free it.
Signed-off-by: Brian Haley
---
src/option.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 in
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 07:29:55PM +1030, Ian Dall wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-03-04 at 07:13 +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 03:53:23PM +1030, Ian Dall wrote:
> > > When a DHCP range has a mode of "static" then the pool of dynamically
> > >
On Sat, Mar 02, 2024 at 05:03:01PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 04:43:20PM -0500, Brian Haley wrote:
> > When a new IPv6 address is being added to a dhcp_config
> > struct, if there is anything invalid regarding the prefix
> > it looks like there
e, as it appears to be gVisor compatibility
> limitation.
Advice: Do a follow-up which aims for much more common interest. Like
explaining how cool gVisor is and where to find more information about it.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
_
"DHCPADVERTISE", NULL, _("no addresses available"));
> + else
> + log6_packet(state, state->lease_allocate ? "DHCPREPLY" :
> "DHCPADVERTISE", NULL, _("no addresses available"));
> break;
l.
>
> sorry test again
>
> Have difficulties to get dnsmasq list mails throught spamfilter
>
Hey Knud,
Now we are both stupid. You with your stupid tests
and I with this stupid email.
I suggest that you consider your tests completed.
Groeten
Geert S
truct is being linked into
> the existing addr6 list in the dhcp_config before the
> validity check, it is best to defer this insertion
> until later so an invalid entry is not present, since
> the CONFIG_ADDR6 flag might not have been set yet.
That is worth its own commit.
Groeten
Gee
google
> for clues for weeks now to little avail. If you need any more info I can
> provide it.
No, I don't need more information about this.
Possible solution to "the problem" would need a well elaborated
Wish is ., however I get
> Thanks,
Don't than
;
> I suspect the problem is with the client not DHCPREQUEST and so the
> server doesn't ACK and thus I guess an IP hasn't actually be
> allocated, thus no "add" event has happened which calls the script.
> if this is the case, can we add an "offer" action?
>
Advice: Verify the setup with another device as a RPi.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
ts and runs fine.
Yes, that makes sense.
Allow project leader Simon some time to respond.
And do know that it is OK to do follow-up messages on this.
> Best regards,
> Martin
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
: is there a way to stop dnsmasq from sending
> router advertisements while at the same still providing the ra-names
> functionality?
Consider to share information on the various attempts.
Regards
Geert Stappers
Not willing to answer yes-no-questions
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 08:47:54PM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>
> If dnsmasq is used in DHCP-only mode, i.e. --port==0, resolv.conf is
> not used for anything. No need to set up inotify watch on it in that
> case.
> ---
> src/inotify.c | 2 +-
> src/dnsmasq.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 3
A)`
> nettle_cflags = `echo $(COPTS) | $(top)/bld/pkg-wrapper HAVE_DNSSEC
> $(PKG_CONFIG) --cflags 'nettle hogweed' \
> HAVE_CRYPTOHASH
> $(PKG_CONFIG) --cflags nettle \
> HAVE_NE
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 11:07:16PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> The manual page had "list or RR-types",
> changed it into "list of RR-types".
>
> Reported-by: Justin
> ---
> man/dnsmasq.8 | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 09:58:19AM +0100, Luigi Baldoni wrote:
> On 4 January 2024, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 08:08:46PM +0100, Luigi Baldoni wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm trying to get rid of a second (kea) dhcp server and
> > > hopef
se bind is listening on eth0, but have
> the dhcp server listen on both interfaces (and more).
What has already been tried?
Advice: Tell in the reply more about the network, such as
which IP-addresses are on the network interfaces.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
gt; # "bert" another name, bertrand
> #cname=bertand,bert
>
>
> It seems that the example has a typo, i.e., it has "bertand" instead of
> "bertrand", It should say:
>
> #cname=bertrand,bert
>
Applied in commit cd4db8246e by Simon with text:
T
le/track/dns/
>
> Cheers,
> Petr
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
n the desired configuration with what is actual
desired. Visit https://xyproblem.info for _why_ explaining more.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
y it always is (three users are all me).
>
> What I don't understand is that there's nothing at all in the logs about the
> failure/timeout.
Imagination is more important as knowledge--Albert Einstein
The sympthoms are that client request doesn't reach the server,
he
uot;.
> Cheers,
> Evandro Menezes
Groeten
Geert Stappers
Doesn't know if cache hit ratio is reported to CHAOS.
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
;a=commitdiff;h=416390f9962e455769aa8ab6df0e105cae07ae55;hp=24804b7431f6ace109e91876aef859a751bf3147
> It occurs a page fault in dnsmasc.c line 1050 (initialisation of
> daemon->tcp_pipes with -1).
Oops.
> Regards,
> Hartmut
Thanks for reporting.
Groeten
Geert Stapper
gt; > REFUSED:
> >
> > i think no-resolv might cause that...
>
> no-resolv tells dnsmasq not to read /etc/resolv.conf but use servers
> specified in dnsmasq.conf, in this case 8.8.4.4 and 8.8.8.8
>
> it could cause trou
ption.
Other idea: network name spaces
I haven't played with network ns. I can't tell if it solves
the "problem" of OP. But it is what I expect from name spaces.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-dis
The manual page had "list or RR-types",
changed it into "list of RR-types".
Reported-by: Justin
---
man/dnsmasq.8 | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/man/dnsmasq.8 b/man/dnsmasq.8
index 30429df..d131bbe 100644
--- a/man/dnsmasq.8
+++ b/man/dnsmasq.8
@@ -390,7 +390
https://git-send-email.io/
> Kind regards,
> Damian Sawicki
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
44 debian/dbus.conf
> $1/usr/share/dbus-1/system.d/dnsmasq.conf
> endef
>
> clean:
I have an idea to save that patch. It is probably thursday
when I have time to "materialize" the idea.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
_
$(INSTALL) -d $(DESTDIR)$(MANDIR)/man8
> $(INSTALL) -m 644 $(MAN)/dnsmasq.8 $(DESTDIR)$(MANDIR)/man8
>
I have an idea to save that patch. It is probably thursday
when I have time to "materialize" the idea.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
__
On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 05:56:41PM +0200, Damian Sawicki via Dnsmasq-discuss
wrote:
> Hello dnsmasq experts,
>
> There seems to be a memory leak in v2.88. The reproduction steps are
> as follows: insert an SRV record with TTL=0 in an upstream DNS server
> and query dnsmasq for this record. I inse
tch at line 11
|Patch failed at 0001 Fix DHCPv6 options memory leaks
|hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
|When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
|If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
|T
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 04:53:19PM -0700, Wink Saville wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 12:33 PM Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 05:27:28PM -0700, Wink Saville wrote:
> > >
> > > Also, I wonder if maybe there should be multiple dnsmasq.conf
> > &g
Previous-Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] wip: Add tag: usage in dhcp-option
In-Reply-To:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 05:27:28PM -0700, Wink Saville wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 1:06 PM Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 11:00:59PM -0700, Wink Saville wrote:
> > &
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 09:48:04PM +0100, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On 22 Sep 2023, at 20:27, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023, Graham Leggett wrote:
> >> I have a dnsmasq config on a development machine that looks like this:
> >>
> >> dhcp-ra
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 11:00:59PM -0700, Wink Saville wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 10:47 PM Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 09:14:13PM -0700, Wink Saville wrote:
> > > --- a/man/dnsmasq.8
> > > +++ b/man/dnsmasq.8
> > > @@ -1317,6
er it correctly configured until proven otherwise.
> Regards,
> Graham
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
1 - 100 of 818 matches
Mail list logo
