On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 01:39:33AM +, Lican Huang wrote:
> 2^128 addresses may be not used all. But I am doubtful of " A more
> realistic estimate of address usage would be 100 * earth's population. " .
> There are many public equipments with IP addresses in the future, may be in
> the st
Lican Huang wrote:
2^128 addresses may be not used all. But I am doubtful of " A more
realistic estimate of address usage would be 100 * earth's population.
" . There are many public equipments with IP addresses in the future,
may be in the street, or any public spaces.
However, this is not
2^128 addresses may be not used all. But I am doubtful of " A more realistic
estimate of address usage would be 100 * earth's population. " . There are many
public equipments with IP addresses in the future, may be in the street, or any
public spaces.
However, this is not problem. If doma
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 03:22:04PM +, Lican Huang wrote:
> My draft is about to handle possible problems when huge amount of domain
> names when Internet is in Ipv6 stage. Because of unlimited amount of Ipv6
> addresses, unlimited amount of hosts ( servers, PC, even mobile phones, e
The basic premise that name use is tied to potential addresses
is false.
Also that fact that the address space is 2^128 in IPv6 in
no way means that we will get 2^128 addresses assigned on
the net.
A more realistic estimate of address usage would b
Lican Huang (huang_lican) writes:
>
>One problem is how to implement the DNS with huge amount
>domain names.
Define huge -- it's already pretty huge today.
>I don't think today's DNS implementation can handle
>successively with huge amount domain names in the future.
My draft is about to handle possible problems when huge amount of domain
names when Internet is in Ipv6 stage. Because of unlimited amount of Ipv6
addresses, unlimited amount of hosts ( servers, PC, even mobile phones, etc )
will have static Ip addresses in the Internet. So, these h
