On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
[added dnsop@ietf.org to the reply]
Subject: [Unbound-users] .PR servfails with Unbound but not with BIND
% dig SOA pr.
I get the key through DLV.
It's outdated and wrong and missing the new key.
On Aug 19 2009, pr added this key:
PR.
a few of us actually did a little work in this area three or four years
ago - did working proof of concepts - and were promptly ignored.
(the claim was - this work was premature)
--bill
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 01:23:51PM -0400, Edward Lewis wrote:
At 13:13 -0400 9/8/09, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 09:56:58AM -0700,
David Conrad d...@virtualized.org wrote
a message of 33 lines which said:
Out of curiosity (since I'm not on the unbound-users list), why did it
work with BIND and not Unbound?
Probably a caching effect and not a real difference between the
On 8/09/09 11:52 AM, Chris Thompson c...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
ISC supposedly get their data for TLDs from the IANA ITAR. That's certainly
up to date now at https://itar.iana.org/anchors/anchors.xml but it would be
more than interesting to know how long that has been the case. (As I recall,
PR
Ed,
On Sep 8, 2009, at 12:12 PM, Edward Lewis wrote:
So, in order to roll a key, you have to ensure DLV registries have
replaced the keys, even when the DLV registries obtain the
originals indirectly?
Seems a bit broken to me.
That's not broken, that's reality.
I disagree. Requiring
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 11:23:16AM -0700,
David Conrad d...@virtualized.org wrote
a message of 21 lines which said:
So, in order to roll a key, you have to ensure DLV registries have
replaced the keys, even when the DLV registries obtain the originals
indirectly?
Seems a bit broken to
On 8 Sep 2009, at 21:19, Edward Lewis wrote:
What would impress me is a proposal to sign the root zone that
included a real good look at the provisioning interface as well as
an OTE. For instance, promise me a response to a DS change in a
matter of hours or minutes, not a day.
Ed, what
In message 68f05a6e-256d-4c61-b03d-82e9e9493...@virtualized.org, David Conrad
writes:
On Sep 8, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
I am not sure what appliance or software setup '.pr' uses, but it
should have
never allowed to finish the key rollover with the bad key in the ISC
In message c6cc01aa.15a48%kim.dav...@icann.org, Kim Davies writes:
On 8/09/09 11:52 AM, Chris Thompson c...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
ISC supposedly get their data for TLDs from the IANA ITAR. That's certainly
up to date now at https://itar.iana.org/anchors/anchors.xml but it would be
more than
