Mark Andrews mailto:ma...@isc.org
Thursday, January 22, 2015 6:29 PM
In message 32707.1421975...@dash.isi.edu, John Heidemann writes:
...
I'm confused. I thought we agreed the installed base doesn't do TCP
pipelining basically ever.
The installed base has supported pipelining forever.
In message 54c40d28.7050...@redbarn.org, Paul Vixie writes:
Mark Andrews mailto:ma...@isc.org
Thursday, January 22, 2015 6:29 PM
In message 32707.1421975...@dash.isi.edu, John Heidemann writes:
...
I'm confused. I thought we agreed the installed base doesn't do TCP
pipelining
Mark Andrews mailto:ma...@isc.org
Saturday, January 24, 2015 2:44 PM
In message 54c40d28.7050...@redbarn.org, Paul Vixie writes:
Pipeling over UDP has been standard practice between nameservers for
25 years. Why are we even worrying about whether it should be
permitted over TCP?
because
Mark Delany mailto:f...@november.emu.st
Saturday, January 24, 2015 2:09 PM
On 24Jan15, Paul Vixie allegedly wrote:
could violate older implementations' reasonable-at-the-time assumptions,
against the burden of choosing a non-interfering signal pattern, like a
new port number, or a new
On 24Jan15, Paul Vixie allegedly wrote:
could violate older implementations' reasonable-at-the-time assumptions,
against the burden of choosing a non-interfering signal pattern, like a
new port number, or a new protocol verb.
Does it have to be that drastic? Wouldn't an EDNS option I
Tony Finch mailto:d...@dotat.at
Friday, January 23, 2015 10:35 AM
Paul Vixie p...@redbarn.org wrote:
why aren't we preferring a TCP/80 (and perhaps TCP/443) solution
Inefficient encoding
- wastes battery
- greater serialization latency
i see your point about battery, and i hadn't
Paul Vixie p...@redbarn.org wrote:
i don't think there's any real time (measurable) difference in
serialization (and deserialization) latency.
Sorry, I was being too terse. I meant extra latency due to the time taken
to transmit all that redundant data.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch
In message 20150124220926.82207.qm...@f5-external.bushwire.net, Mark Delany
writes:
On 24Jan15, Paul Vixie allegedly wrote:
could violate older implementations' reasonable-at-the-time assumptions,
against the burden of choosing a non-interfering signal pattern, like a
new port number,
In message 54c424f2.4020...@redbarn.org, Paul Vixie writes:
Mark Delany mailto:f...@november.emu.st
Saturday, January 24, 2015 2:09 PM
On 24Jan15, Paul Vixie allegedly wrote:
could violate older implementations' reasonable-at-the-time assumptions,
against the burden of choosing a
In message 54c4267a.9030...@redbarn.org, Paul Vixie writes:
Mark Andrews mailto:ma...@isc.org
Saturday, January 24, 2015 2:44 PM
In message 54c40d28.7050...@redbarn.org, Paul Vixie writes:
Pipeling over UDP has been standard practice between nameservers for
25 years. Why are we even
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear list members,
today the French newspaper Le Monde published information on a secret
NSA program, MORECOWBELL [0], that reveals the agency has been using the
DNS infrastructure to monitor host and website activity across the Internet.
This
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 1/24/2015 7:15 AM, hellekin wrote:
today the French newspaper Le Monde published information on a
secret NSA program, MORECOWBELL [0], that reveals the agency has
been using the DNS infrastructure to monitor host and website
activity across
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 07:29:27AM -0800,
Paul Ferguson fergdawgs...@mykolab.com wrote
a message of 47 lines which said:
I have not found delved into the MCB documents in depth, but from
the cursory description, this sound like nothing more than Passive DNS
monitoring,
No, MoreCowBell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 1/24/2015 7:58 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 07:29:27AM -0800, Paul Ferguson
fergdawgs...@mykolab.com wrote a message of 47 lines which said:
I have not found delved into the MCB documents in depth, but
from the
14 matches
Mail list logo
