I think the mapping of SMTP (a protocol, an over-the wire framing and
dialogue about exchanging mail) has been crossed (crossing-the-beam
crossed) with a ROLE. a client can be an SMTP speaker, and a
forwarder/delivery agent can be an SMTP speaker. They aren't performing the
sale role.
So does DANE
I'm having what seems to me a very peculiar argument over in DANE.
There's a draft called draft-huque-dane-client-cert-02 about
validating SSL certificates for client hosts. The idea, which seems
reasonable, is that if an SMTP or other client presents a TLS
certificate claiming that it's outbound
Greetings again. As promised during the run-up to RFC 7719, the DNS
Terminology draft, we are starting a revision. The goals are:
-In places where the WG came to tentative consensus, strengthen that
consensus
-Possibly reorganize and re-categorize the discussion of "resolvers"
-Formally upda
At Sun, 13 Dec 2015 22:08:13 -0500,
Tim Wicinski wrote:
> This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-fanf-dnsop-rfc2317bis
>
> The draft is available here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fanf-dnsop-rfc2317bis/
>
> Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption
>
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group
of the IETF.
Title : DNS Terminology
Authors : Paul Hoffman
Andrew Sullivan
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group
of the IETF.
Title : Domain Name System (DNS) Cookies
Authors : Donald E. Eastlake
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 03:47:16PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> > returned RRSIG first for 44% of my statistically dubious sample.
>
> It is said that PowerDNS does it at random, on purpose, to break
> erroneous programs.
Let me clarify that. PowerDNS Authoritative has always randomized re
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 02:43:46PM +,
Dick Franks wrote
a message of 176 lines which said:
> returned RRSIG first for 44% of my statistically dubious sample.
It is said that PowerDNS does it at random, on purpose, to break
erroneous programs.
_
Attempt to repeat your result using
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
#
use Net::DNS 1.01;
my $resolver = new Net::DNS::Resolver( nameserver => 'ns02.one.com.',
dnssec => 1 );
$resolver->send(qw( masters-consultants.fr SOA ))->print;
#
returned RRSIG first for 44% of my statistically dubious sample.
Di
On 11 January 2016 at 21:20, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> Interesting: it sends the signature before the SOA (and it breaks at
> least one DNS program - one of mine, shame):
>
> % dig @ns02.one.com. SOA masters-consultants.fr.
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.9.5-9+deb8u3-Debian <<>> @ns02.one.com. SOA
> masters
10 matches
Mail list logo
