Re: [DNSOP] Heads-up - draft about "letting localhost be localhost" in SUNSET4 that really should be in DNSOP

>> Local Host: "Hip and cool city trips. Totally not creepy and weird." > Shane is the sarcasm really helpful here? It rarely is. > localhost is already out of bounds for the gTLD processes at ICANN and you > well know that. > > As per the gTLD Applicant Guidebook, section 2.2.1.2.1 Reserved >

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse-06.txt

At Thu, 17 Nov 2016 11:36:04 +0100, Ralph Dolmans wrote: > Maybe I'm missing something, but it is not clear to me whether this > document (-06) allows generation of NODATA answers using matching NSEC > records that do not have the QTYPE set in the type bitmap. > > I don't see

Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC operational issues long term

Make sure your CPE supports IPv6 only operations before putting on the shelf, it's hopefully IPv4 will be decommissioned 10 years from now, so DNSSEC bootstrap could be moot point. >-Original Message- >From: DNSOP [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mikael >Abrahamsson >Sent:

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse-06.txt

Hi, This document looks almost good to me. I have some nit comments. - Page 3, Section 1, says a DNS negative cache is used to cache the fact that a name does not exist. But it also caches if the name is valid but there are no records for the type. Perhaps: "..., and is used to cache the fact