[DNSOP] CFP for DINR 2023 virtual workshop, Feb. 22 2023, for early DNS research

2022-12-15 Thread Wes Hardaker
We would like to invite you to our upcoming virtual workshop on "DNS and Internet Naming Research Directions - 2023" (DINR-2023). We will be holding this workshop virtually over Zoom on Wednesday 2023-02-22 from 14:00 to 20:00 UTC (that's 07:00-13:00 PDT on the US west coast). This year, we have a

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements

2022-12-15 Thread Daniel Migault
Hi Peter and Vladimir, The disconnect between the requirements and the recommendations effectively reflects the misconception we had in the beginning. We have always wanted to provide guidelines to DRO and started listing some requirements for the software. However, the operators generally are no

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements

2022-12-15 Thread Daniel Migault
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 6:29 AM Vladimír Čunát wrote: > On 25/11/2022 18.26, Daniel Migault wrote: > > So let me know how we came to this lines and I suspect we do share some > similar concerns. A recurrent question and reticence we receive from MNO > and ISPs regarding DNSSEC is that they are re

Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-19

2022-12-15 Thread Peter Thomassen
On 12/15/22 01:59, Martin Schanzenbach wrote: On 14.12.22 12:25, Paul Wouters wrote: On Dec 14, 2022, at 11:29, Eliot Lear wrote: On 14.12.22 17:13, Paul Wouters wrote: "bob.foo.alt" still squarely falls into "my" namespace It is indeed not “yours”. ... from the perspective of DNS. Whether

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements

2022-12-15 Thread Peter Thomassen
On 12/15/22 15:01, Vladimír Čunát wrote: On 15/12/2022 14.45, Peter Thomassen wrote: In what sense is this document "informational" when it is called "validator requirements", or, conversely, in what sense does it spell out "requirements" when it is only "informational" and not "standards track"

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements

2022-12-15 Thread Vladimír Čunát
On 15/12/2022 14.45, Peter Thomassen wrote: In what sense is this document "informational" when it is called "validator requirements", or, conversely, in what sense does it spell out "requirements" when it is only "informational" and not "standards track"? The current *title* says "Recommend

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements

2022-12-15 Thread Peter Thomassen
Hi, In what sense is this document "informational" when it is called "validator requirements", or, conversely, in what sense does it spell out "requirements" when it is only "informational" and not "standards track"? Best, Peter On 10/19/22 21:21, Tim Wicinski wrote: This starts a Working

Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-19

2022-12-15 Thread Vladimír Čunát
On 15/12/2022 01.59, Martin Schanzenbach wrote: If there is an obvious way to do it, the draft could give an example. Whatever you mean by "go to a regulated space" should be given with clear example. You can simply register a DNS name and use that sub-tree in non-DNS context (as well).  That