On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 4:06 PM tjw ietf wrote:
> John
>
> Paul is right. As an operator one thing I always obsess on in is the data
> in my zones. Why is it there , should it be, etc. Another example you may
> understand is “who created this incorrect DMARC record?”
>
> I’ve given them much
It appears that Paul Wouters said:
>But also, the pain is not felt at the people who dictate how to use
>their DNS validation scheme. It is with the DNS administrators finding
>a bunch of unrecognisable DNS records and not knowing what the hell
>they are for and whether they can or should be
John
Paul is right. As an operator one thing I always obsess on in is the data in my
zones. Why is it there , should it be, etc. Another example you may understand
is “who created this incorrect DMARC record?”
I’ve given them much much feedback. I am eager for others to sound off.
And
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023, John R Levine wrote:
Surely we know people who run services that use DNS validation. How about
talking to some of them and finding out what kind of user errors they run
into?
The insinuation here is that we didn't talk to them. One of the authors
is at salesforce, who
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023, John Levine wrote:
That makes no sense. Why is it harder to copy a string to the name field
in a cruddy web GUI than to the data field? It's copy and paste either way.
For one, if the zone data presented to you is like a sorted zone file.
Second, because LHS entries
Peter
There is no undesirable consequences in pushing new versions before they expire
without changes.
Actually i have an action item to review some of the discussion on this draft
which is now on my short list as we push several of these other documents
forward.
Tim
Sent from my iPhone
Hi Joe, all,
On 2/17/23 21:48, Joe Abley wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 15:03, Peter Thomassen mailto:pe...@desec.io>> wrote:
I am not sure whether draft expiry impacts the WG document handling process in
any way.
I would not worry. You can always reset the timer by bumping the version and
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of
the IETF.
Title : Automatic DNSSEC Bootstrapping using Authenticated
Signals from the Zone's Operator
Authors
OpenThread. It’s on GitHub.
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 at 15:38, John Kristoff wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 13:52:03 -0500
> Ted Lemon wrote:
>
> > It clearly is, in the sense that someone is using it and it keeps
> > coming up. :)
>
> Hi Ted,
>
> I'm just catching up on this conversation and maybe
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 15:03, Peter Thomassen wrote:
> I am not sure whether draft expiry impacts the WG document handling process
> in any way.
I would not worry. You can always reset the timer by bumping the version and
the date and resubmitting, if it bothers you. The particular lifetime
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 13:52:03 -0500
Ted Lemon wrote:
> It clearly is, in the sense that someone is using it and it keeps
> coming up. :)
Hi Ted,
I'm just catching up on this conversation and maybe I've missed it, but
can you point me at the implementation(s) that are setting QDCOUNT > 1?
Hi Michael, Chairs,
On 2/17/23 14:10, Michael Bauland wrote:
we've recently implemented the DNSSEC bootstrapping as defined in this draft in
our registry system TANGO as well as in the CORE registry system.
I just realised that the draft is going to expire tomorrow. What are the next
steps?
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of
the IETF.
Title : DNS Glue Requirements in Referral Responses
Authors : M. Andrews
It appears that Paul Wouters said:
>> _a1b2c3.example.com IN ... "whatever"
>> _crudco.example.com IN ... "a1b2c3"
>
>Adding cryptogrpahically strong/long strings in the prefix seems
>unwieldly and prone to problems - especially if the user has to put
>these in via a webgui of mediocre quality.
John Levine wrote:
While I think it would be good to publish some best practices in this area,
this draft still seems scattered and makes some assertions that seem to me
to be somewhere between unsupported and mistaken.
I think we agree that the goal is there are two parties, call them
owner
Forwarded Message
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-bellis-dnsop-qdcount-is-one-00.txt
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 08:12:18 -0800
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
To: Joe Abley , Ray Bellis
A new version of I-D, draft-bellis-dnsop-qdcount-is-one-00.txt
has been
(speaking without a hat)
I think this includes some good updates around the definition of Glue, and
not because
we've spent many hours wordsmithing this. I would like to see some folks
who have
commented about the definitions in the past, review these changes.
Thanks the authors for their
Dear DNSOP WG,
Following the latest consultation with the Working Group on bailiwick
and in-domain/sibling name servers terminology, the authors and chairs
believe this document has reached the stage of being ready for Working
Group Last Call.
Due to normative reference to
Hi,
we've recently implemented the DNSSEC bootstrapping as defined in this
draft in our registry system TANGO as well as in the CORE registry system.
I just realised that the draft is going to expire tomorrow. What are the
next steps? Will the draft be advanced? Will there be an extension?
19 matches
Mail list logo
