I have a strong objection to this document.
In the introduction is it said:
"The DNS specification [RFC1034] [RFC1035] does not include specific
guidance for the behaviour of DNS servers or clients in this
situation. This document aims to provide such guidance."
It is true that the origin
Bob Harold wrote:
>
> ...
>
> Section 4 includes:
> "1. A DNS responder may choose to search for an owner name that
> matches the QNAME and, if that name owns multiple RRs, return just one
> of them."
>
> I think "RRs" should be "RRSets", as in section 5.
strong +1.
--
Paul Vixie
___
>
>> A new version of I-D, draft-jabley-dnsop-refuse-any-01.txt
>> has been successfully submitted by Joe Abley and posted to the
>> IETF repository.
>>
>> Name: draft-jabley-dnsop-refuse-any
>> Revision: 01
>> Title: Providing Minimal-Sized Responses to DNS Queries with
>>
New text added following review by Evan Hunt (on this list) and David
Lawrence (at dns-oarc in Montréal, I think).
Forwarded message:
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
To: Marek Majkowski , Joe Abley
, Olafur Gudmundsson
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-jabley-dnsop-refuse-any-01.tx
