Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc4641bis-11.txt

2012-06-01 Thread Olaf Kolkman
Dear Chairs, Some friendly reminders... On May 21, 2012, at 11:40 AM, Olaf Kolkman wrote: Chairs, would you like us to incorporate (some of, see comments from Paul H.) the suggestions in the document _now_ or after you have done your review? This question has been left unanswered.

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc4641bis-11.txt

2012-06-01 Thread SM
Dear Internet Engineering Steering Group, At 02:00 01-06-2012, Olaf Kolkman wrote: That is almost 6 month now. Granted, we have had some comments coming in after the WGLC ended, all of the type that would make reasonable errata. Besides, that is a sign that people take the effort to find and

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc4641bis-11.txt

2012-06-01 Thread Stephen Morris
On 01/06/2012 22:03, SM wrote: Dear Internet Engineering Steering Group, At 02:00 01-06-2012, Olaf Kolkman wrote: That is almost 6 month now. Granted, we have had some comments coming in after the WGLC ended, all of the type that would make reasonable errata. Besides, that is a sign that

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc4641bis-11.txt

2012-05-21 Thread Matthijs Mekking
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Suresh, Thanks for your review. I have commented on your feedback in between lines. However, I am not planning on any action now. I have lost confidence in that this document will ever move forward. The WGLC for this document was June 2011,

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc4641bis-11.txt

2012-05-18 Thread Suresh Krishnaswamy
I'm reading 4641bis after a really long time and the current version appears useful and very well done. So I'd like to applaud the editors and working group for bringing this document into such good shape. Leaving aside the nits, here are some of my comments on -11. 3.2.1. Rolling a KSK that

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc4641bis-11.txt

2012-05-18 Thread Paul Hoffman
On May 18, 2012, at 11:30 AM, Suresh Krishnaswamy wrote: I'm reading 4641bis after a really long time and the current version appears useful and very well done. So I'd like to applaud the editors and working group for bringing this document into such good shape. Leaving aside the nits,

[DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc4641bis-11.txt

2012-04-13 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group of the IETF. Title : DNSSEC Operational Practices, Version 2 Author(s) : Olaf M. Kolkman

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc4641bis-11.txt

2012-04-13 Thread Matthijs Mekking
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 FYI: This version adopts the review items from Alfred and Marc. Best regards, Matthijs On 04/13/2012 09:11 AM, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work