Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance - should child remove the CDS RR?

2014-04-14 Thread 神明達哉
At Mon, 14 Apr 2014 15:10:56 +0200, Matthijs Mekking wrote: > > C: The child MAY remove the CDS/CDNSKEY RR from the zone once the > > parent has published it, and this is how to do that safely. > > > > So I'm ok if they stay in, but we need a way to get them out for the > > ones that need that. >

Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance - should child remove the CDS RR?

2014-04-14 Thread Warren Kumari
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Warren Kumari wrote: > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Tim Wicinski wrote: >> >> On 4/14/14, 8:50 AM, Patrik Fältström wrote: >>> >>> On 14 apr 2014, at 14:32, Antoin Verschuren >>> wrote: >>> op 12-04-14 09:28, Patrik Fältström schreef: > > No, I

Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance - should child remove the CDS RR?

2014-04-14 Thread Warren Kumari
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Tim Wicinski wrote: > > On 4/14/14, 8:50 AM, Patrik Fältström wrote: >> >> On 14 apr 2014, at 14:32, Antoin Verschuren >> wrote: >> >>> op 12-04-14 09:28, Patrik Fältström schreef: No, I want B. That CDS and CDNSKEY is staying in the zone. >>> >>> To kee

Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance - should child remove the CDS RR?

2014-04-14 Thread Tim Wicinski
On 4/14/14, 8:50 AM, Patrik Fältström wrote: On 14 apr 2014, at 14:32, Antoin Verschuren wrote: op 12-04-14 09:28, Patrik Fältström schreef: No, I want B. That CDS and CDNSKEY is staying in the zone. To keep it in the same thread, I want: C: The child MAY remove the CDS/CDNSKEY RR from the

Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance - should child remove the CDS RR?

2014-04-14 Thread Matthijs Mekking
On 04/14/2014 02:32 PM, Antoin Verschuren wrote: > op 12-04-14 09:28, Patrik Fältström schreef: >> No, I want B. That CDS and CDNSKEY is staying in the zone. > > To keep it in the same thread, > I want: > > C: The child MAY remove the CDS/CDNSKEY RR from the zone once the > parent has published i

Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance - should child remove the CDS RR?

2014-04-14 Thread Patrik Fältström
On 14 apr 2014, at 14:32, Antoin Verschuren wrote: > op 12-04-14 09:28, Patrik Fältström schreef: > > No, I want B. That CDS and CDNSKEY is staying in the zone. > > To keep it in the same thread, > I want: > > C: The child MAY remove the CDS/CDNSKEY RR from the zone once the > parent has publi

Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance - should child remove the CDS RR?

2014-04-14 Thread Antoin Verschuren
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 op 12-04-14 09:28, Patrik Fältström schreef: > No, I want B. That CDS and CDNSKEY is staying in the zone. To keep it in the same thread, I want: C: The child MAY remove the CDS/CDNSKEY RR from the zone once the parent has published it, and this is ho

Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance - should child remove the CDS RR?

2014-04-12 Thread Patrik Fältström
On 12 apr 2014, at 15:04, Warren Kumari wrote: > Gods I suck at this. No, you are good at this! Patrik signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listi

Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance - should child remove the CDS RR?

2014-04-12 Thread Warren Kumari
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 3:28 AM, Patrik Fältström wrote: > No, I want B. That CDS and CDNSKEY is staying in the zone. Doh! Yes. Sorry, when I resent this with the subject added I forgot which order I'd listed the two options - I'd though A was B and B was A. Unless we hear objections I'm planning

Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance - should child remove the CDS RR?

2014-04-12 Thread Patrik Fältström
No, I want B. That CDS and CDNSKEY is staying in the zone. Patrik On 12 apr 2014, at 00:11, Warren Kumari wrote: > [ Apologies all - I initially sent this with no subject line. > Resending. Hopefully this makes things clearer... Also, unless we hear > strong objections I'm planning on doing w

[DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance - should child remove the CDS RR?

2014-04-11 Thread Warren Kumari
[ Apologies all - I initially sent this with no subject line. Resending. Hopefully this makes things clearer... Also, unless we hear strong objections I'm planning on doing what Patrik and Matthijs suggested, option A ] On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: > Hi there all, > > At