/ Poet/Joshua Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| OpenDocs publishing is considering publishing the 2.02 version of DocBook
| the Definitive Guide.
Please don't. The 2.0.2 version is entirely unready for print
publication: it's a work in progress, slowly making a transformation
from an
Hello,
Fair enough --- but understand that would would edit it ;)
J
On 31 Oct 2001, Norman Walsh wrote:
/ Poet/Joshua Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| OpenDocs publishing is considering publishing the 2.02 version of DocBook
| the Definitive Guide.
Please don't. The 2.0.2 version
I 'read' the print, use the on-line for quick search/reference.
REgards DaveP
This is what I think,
I wouldn't use the reference within a hardcopy,
but read the other content when having
no screen in front of me.
I would buy it,
Chris
impression of DocBook
if it were hardcopy.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Pawson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 30 October 2001 4:37
To: Phillip Shelton; 'Poet/Joshua Drake'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: DOCBOOK: Would you buy the DocBook book?
At 10:49 29/10/2001 +1000
Joshua Drake wrote:
What are the main differences between it and the existing O'Reilly
Duck Book?
The current OReilly book covers 3.x of DocBook the new book covers
4.x.
We would also add a couple of chapters on HOWTO type stuff.
If there was more information on customizing DSSSL stylesheets,
On Fri, 2001-10-26 at 19:06, Poet/Joshua Drake wrote:
Hello,
OpenDocs publishing is considering publishing the 2.02 version of DocBook
the Definitive Guide. We have talked with OReilly and they are o.k. with
us publishing it (it is GFDL).
My question is; would you buy it? Is it useful?
