Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Onechunk problem

2002-05-17 Thread Martin Perina
On t, 2002-05-16 at 20:19, Norman Walsh wrote: / Norman Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: | / Dennis Grace [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: | | Yeah, I figured I was missing something. I downloaded the latest version of | | chunk common and tried it, but I got an error because the

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Onechunk problem

2002-05-17 Thread Norman Walsh
/ Dennis Grace [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: | Well, almost. The EXP2 version of onechunk.xsl gives me a single file | output, and it includes every section, chapter, and appendix without | generating error messages. Unfortunately, it set up the TOC links for a | chunked output. So, for a

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Onechunk problem

2002-05-17 Thread Norman Walsh
/ Martin Perina [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: | 1) All extensions jars consist only of empty directories, |no classes. | | 2) manifest.xsl is missing in XHTML stylesheets. Fixed and fixed, respectively. Be seeing you,

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Onechunk problem

2002-05-17 Thread Dennis Grace
-APPS: Re: Onechunk problem

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Onechunk problem

2002-05-16 Thread Norman Walsh
/ Dennis Grace [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: | Okay, so now, what exactly does this new version of onechunk do? It looks | like it just passes everything off to chunk.xsl. What is the onechunk param | supposed to do? Sorry, you need to get the new chunk.xsl as well. The onechunk parameter

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Onechunk problem

2002-05-16 Thread Dennis Grace
| |[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Subject: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Onechunk problem

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Onechunk problem

2002-05-16 Thread Dennis Grace
] | | Subject: Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Onechunk problem

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Onechunk problem

2002-05-16 Thread Norman Walsh
/ Dennis Grace [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: | Yeah, I figured I was missing something. I downloaded the latest version of | chunk common and tried it, but I got an error because the new chunk.xsl | contains an include: | | xsl:include href=manifest.xsl/ Can you say 1.50.1-EXP2? Wait

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Onechunk problem

2002-05-16 Thread Norman Walsh
/ Norman Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: | / Dennis Grace [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: | | Yeah, I figured I was missing something. I downloaded the latest version of | | chunk common and tried it, but I got an error because the new chunk.xsl | | contains an include: | | | |

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Onechunk problem

2002-05-16 Thread Dennis Grace
Hi all, Norm said: Done. Try 1.50.1-EXP2. It should, at least, be internally consistent. And it may even work :-) Well, almost. The EXP2 version of onechunk.xsl gives me a single file output, and it includes every section, chapter, and appendix without generating error messages.

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Onechunk problem

2002-05-15 Thread Norman Walsh
/ Dennis Grace [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: | Okay, all of this information about the refname is fascinating, but I'm | still confused by the problem with onechunk.xsl. | | Norm put a fix in CVS for the bug I reported, thinking the problem was in | DocBook. That fix adds the line | |

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Onechunk problem

2002-05-15 Thread Norman Walsh
/ Dennis Grace [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: | Okay, all of this information about the refname is fascinating, but I'm | still confused by the problem with onechunk.xsl. It was botched. Fixed now in CVS. Er, I think :-) Be seeing you,

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Onechunk problem

2002-05-15 Thread Dennis Grace
Hi Norm, Okay, so now, what exactly does this new version of onechunk do? It looks like it just passes everything off to chunk.xsl. What is the onechunk param supposed to do? When I ran version 1.6 of onechunk.xsl against my test files, I got exactly what I'd expect from running the files