On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 07:05:47PM +0200, Johan Hake wrote:
> On Sunday 06 September 2009 18:32:18 Garth N. Wells wrote:
> > Anders Logg wrote:
> > > Should we swap the meaning of () and [] for parameters in C++?
> > >
> > > Access is most commonly made to parameters, not nested parameter sets,
> >
On Sunday 06 September 2009 18:32:18 Garth N. Wells wrote:
> Anders Logg wrote:
> > Should we swap the meaning of () and [] for parameters in C++?
> >
> > Access is most commonly made to parameters, not nested parameter sets,
> > so swapping the two would make the Python and C++ interfaces more
> >
Anders Logg wrote:
> Should we swap the meaning of () and [] for parameters in C++?
>
> Access is most commonly made to parameters, not nested parameter sets,
> so swapping the two would make the Python and C++ interfaces more
> similar.
>
The more similar the interfaces are the better.
Garth
Should we swap the meaning of () and [] for parameters in C++?
Access is most commonly made to parameters, not nested parameter sets,
so swapping the two would make the Python and C++ interfaces more
similar.
--
Anders
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
