I've finally added support for "normal" command/reply tests for my
imaptest program (http://imapwiki.org/ImapTest).
My plan is that imaptest will include some generic IMAP compliancy tests
and Dovecot will include some more strict Dovecot-specific checks. "make
dist" will run all these tests befor
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 20:28 -0700, Mike Brown wrote:
> > Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > > On Feb 12, 2008, at 1:14 AM, Mike Brown wrote:
> > >
> > > > Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > > >> On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 02:53 -0700, Mike Brown wrote:
> > > >>> I'm running dovecot 1.0.10, but am se
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Feb 27, 2008, at 4:49 PM, Carsten Henkel wrote:
DELIVER=/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver
:0 w
| $DELIVER Maildir
There shouldn't be Maildir in there. deliver reads dovecot.conf to
figure out where your mails are located.
Sorry for jumping in this thread. I am cur
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Feb 27, 2008, at 8:49 AM, Andy Dills wrote:
>
> > From reading the docs, it appears I would not be able to use the dovecot
> > LDA due to locking issues (bummer), and I should configure dovecot to
> > store index files on a local disk of the primary
Some addional information that I found:
This problem started on 02/21/2008 when I moved a message that has id
1191941480.M342094P9293V0903I003B9713_0.cronos from .Spam
folder to INBOX and then moved the message back to .Spam folder.
Today this message looks to be causing the probl
on 2/27/2008 1:46 PM Kevin A. McGrail spake the following:
Well, for me, it's a vast number of boxes deployed and often maintained
by others that are running stabling for 8+ years making the nuance of
upgrading to a newer version of GCC fairly mute from a lay persons
perspective. Seriously, how
on 2/27/2008 2:06 PM Sven Anderson spake the following:
Am 27.02.2008 um 15:31 schrieb Timo Sirainen:
Why are you people still using so old gcc versions? I guess I could
accept a patch something like:
I'm using an old custom-made vserver system, and it's running fine, so
why spend a lot of
Am 27.02.2008 um 15:31 schrieb Timo Sirainen:
Why are you people still using so old gcc versions? I guess I could
accept a patch something like:
I'm using an old custom-made vserver system, and it's running fine, so
why spend a lot of time to migrate to a newer distribution?
Sven
--
ht
On 2/27/2008, Kevin A. McGrail ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Well, for me, it's a vast number of boxes deployed and often
maintained by others that are running stabling for 8+ years making
the nuance of upgrading to a newer version of GCC fairly mute from a
lay persons perspective. Seriously, how
Well, for me, it's a vast number of boxes deployed and often maintained by
others that are running stabling for 8+ years making the nuance of upgrading
to a newer version of GCC fairly mute from a lay persons perspective.
Seriously, how can you argue with a non-technical user that their box
ins
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Feb 27, 2008, at 4:22 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
I can't argue with that logic but documenting it in a wiki or INSTALL or
including the patches with the distribution might be more agreeable.
Why are you people still using so old gcc versions?
A
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 20:32 +0100, Anders wrote:
> Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> > Well, it's all open source, did you look at it? It shouldn't be too hard
> > to just ignore the result of include, no?
> >
>
> Yeah, I did look.
>
> I sure could patch something together. Before doing that, though, I
Steffen Kaiser wrote:
Well, it's all open source, did you look at it? It shouldn't be too hard
to just ignore the result of include, no?
Yeah, I did look.
I sure could patch something together. Before doing that, though, I
hoped to be enlightened with an official way, so I would not have t
Aha ok!
I can see the cache hits and misses now: so that's fine.
But I will just keep using my imapproxy to reduce I/O.
Thanks Timo.
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Timo Sirainen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: woensdag 27 februari 2008 17:38
Aan: Jan van den Berg
CC:
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 17:33 +0100, Jan van den Berg wrote:
> Sort of the same thing: but more inconsistent. Sometimes I click five
> folders and OE will have done 3 logins sometimes 2.
>
>
> So new IMAP logins for (more or less) every click in Thunderbird and OE;
> this is what auth_cache_size
Hi,
I have:
auth_cache_size = 4096
auth_cache_ttl = 3600
I use Thunderbird connecting to my Dovecot IMAP server 1.1rc1. I click
on five folders and close Thunderbird.
This is my log:
dovecot: Feb 27 17:26:56 Info: Dovecot v1.1.rc1 starting up
dovecot: Feb 27 17:26:56 Info: auth-work
Timo Sirainen escreveu:
On Feb 27, 2008, at 2:24 PM, Fábio M. Catunda wrote:
There isn't anything else before this line? Something causes fsck,
which causes:
Now I have some more messages:
dovecot: 2008-02-27 10:30:18 Error: IMAP(): Corrupted
index cache file
/var/virtual/contactnet.com.br
On 056, 02 25, 2008 at 12:57:19PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Feb 24, 2008, at 11:21 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure what NTLM version is used as default by authentication
>> between Outlook and dovecot and I couldn't find it out with a packet
>> sniffer.
>>
>> I think its NTL
thanks, it works.
have a nice day
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
On Feb 27, 2008, at 4:49 PM, Carsten Henkel wrote:
DELIVER=/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver
:0 w
| $DELIVER Maildir
There shouldn't be Maildir in there. deliver reads dovecot.conf to
figure out where your mails are located.
--
On Feb 27, 2008, at 4:49 PM, Carsten Henkel wrote:
DELIVER=/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver
:0 w
| $DELIVER Maildir
There shouldn't be Maildir in there. deliver reads dovecot.conf to
figure out where your mails are located.
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Feb 27, 2008, at 8:49 AM, Andy Dills wrote:
From reading the docs, it appears I would not be able to use the
dovecot
LDA due to locking issues (bummer), and I should configure dovecot to
store index files on a local disk of the primary pop/imap server
rather
than on the netapp.
I don't
On Wednesday 27 February 2008 12:03:50 Rob Coward wrote:
> Have a read of http://wiki.dovecot.org/Variables
>
Thanks
DELIVER=/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver
:0 w
| $DELIVER Maildir
mails are delivered
thanks
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
On Feb 27, 2008, at 4:36 PM, Carsten Henkel wrote:
procmail: Program failure (64) of "/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver"
#define EX_USAGE64 /* command line usa
* Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Feb 27, 2008, at 10:26 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>
>>fmt=0x80e8f54 "Trying to close mailbox %s with open transactions",
>
> Was this with or without
> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/0917df31efec ?
With!
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED
On Feb 27, 2008, at 4:36 PM, Carsten Henkel wrote:
procmail: Program failure (64) of "/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver"
#define EX_USAGE64 /* command line usage error */
How do you call deliver?
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Feb 27, 2008, at 10:26 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
fmt=0x80e8f54 "Trying to close mailbox %s with open transactions",
Was this with or without http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/0917df31efec
?
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
hi together,
procmail provides an error by delivery.
procmail: Executing "/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver,Maildir"
procmail: Error while writing to "/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver"
procmail: Program failure (64) of "/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver"
procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER=/usr/
On Feb 27, 2008, at 2:24 PM, Fábio M. Catunda wrote:
dovecot: 2008-02-27 08:39:39 Warning: IMAP(to me>): fscking index file /var/virtual/contactnet.com.br/fcatunda/
Maildir/dovecot.index
There isn't anything else before this line? Something causes fsck,
which causes:
dovecot: 2008-02-27 08
On Feb 27, 2008, at 4:22 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
I can't argue with that logic but documenting it in a wiki or
INSTALL or including the patches with the distribution might be more
agreeable.
Why are you people still using so old gcc versions? I guess I could
accept a patch something l
I can't argue with that logic but documenting it in a wiki or INSTALL or
including the patches with the distribution might be more agreeable.
And yes, the patch below was a cut and paste from your patch. I didn't mean
to say otherwise just to point out that for gcc 2.96, only two small array
Charles Marcus escreveu:
On 2/27/2008, Fábio M. Catunda ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
dovecot 1.0.5-1 debian package with maildir
squirrelmail 1.4.9a-2 debian package
They're both older...
The first thing I always do if I am having a problem with a certain
app is make sure I'm running current
On 2/27/2008, Fábio M. Catunda ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
dovecot 1.0.5-1 debian package with maildir
squirrelmail 1.4.9a-2 debian package
They're both older...
The first thing I always do if I am having a problem with a certain app
is make sure I'm running current versions.
Backports will
Hi.
I don't know if the problem is related with squirrelmail or not, but I
started to have index corruption when I started to try squirrelmail.
Some informaton about my instalation:
dovecot 1.0.5-1 debian package with maildir
squirrelmail 1.4.9a-2 debian package
Some log information:
dovecot
hi together,
behind the update on suse 10.3 to 1.1rc1 from
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc1.tar.gz there was now
change aof dovecot version. (./configure && make && make install)
dovecot --version
1.0.5
there was no error at compiling.
--
Die Frau zum Mann, der in der Thea
Hello
I use dovecot-1.0.7 for imap. I also use vpopmail5.4.x. on qmail.
It works well so far. But when I log in to imap server, I could not see the
last login time vuserinfo command in vpopmail.
How can I correct that ?
Thanks.
Have a read of http://wiki.dovecot.org/Variables
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 09:46 +0100, Chantal Rosmuller wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I would like my mail directory structure to be like this:
>
> /var/vmail/firstletterdomain/domain/username
>
> what would be the syntax in dovecot.conf?
>
>
> Thanks, ch
>From my logs:
Feb 27 08:10:33 postamt dovecot: IMAP(username): expunge: uid=2793, box=Trash,
msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, size=3025
Feb 27 08:10:33 postamt dovecot: IMAP(username): expunge: uid=2794, box=Trash,
msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, size=12833
Feb 27 08:10:33 postamt dovecot: IMAP(username):
* Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Core was generated by /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/imap'.
Client: Microsoft Office Outlook 2003 SP2
(Microsoft Office Professional Edition 2003)
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung
This is included in my patch already, but Timo didn't want to commit it,
since [0] is gcc specific, and [] is C99 standard.
Kevin A. McGrail schrieb:
> As a follow-up on this, these two lines also helped me to compile the
> 1.1rc1 on gcc 2.96:
>
> diff -ru dovecot-1.1.beta13/src/lib/str-find.c
>
Hi list,
I would like my mail directory structure to be like this:
/var/vmail/firstletterdomain/domain/username
what would be the syntax in dovecot.conf?
Thanks, chantal
Hello, list!
Seems that quota warning feature doesn't work for me.
I have dovecot-1.0.9 with quota-rewrite patch
(http://dovecot.org/patches/1.0/quota-rewrite-1.0.9.diff). Dovecot works as
imap, pop3 server and lda for postfix.
Here is plugin section in dovecot.conf
>>>/etc/dovecot.conf<<<
...
p
Core was generated by /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/imap'.
Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.
#0 0xb7fb6410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0xb7fb6410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
#1 0xb7e85f15 in raise () from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#2 0xb7e87891 in abort () from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
42 matches
Mail list logo