Michael Dunne wrote:
Greetings,
Thanks to everyone that replied. I have not been able to isolate the
cause, has this happened to anyone else?
Just a few days ago I sent a file to someone on my same mailserver who
then reported the file corrupt and sent it back to me (where I also
verified it
How to call deliver program to be sure it will *NEVER* generate bounce
messages? [all signalling via deliver exit code ]
--
[plen: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : a...@onet.eu : a...@xl.wp.pl
You k'n hide de fier, but w'at you gwine do wid de smoke?
-- Joel Chandler Harris, proverbs of Uncle
Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
How to call deliver program to be sure it will *NEVER* generate bounce
messages? [all signalling via deliver exit code ]
According to the Wiki (http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA), that would be the
-e option.
--
A general leading the State Department resembles a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009, Peter Lindgren wrote:
my own private mail server admin, I just wonder why the sysconf and state
dirs defaults to $prefix? Maybe I'm old-school, but isn't /etc and /var,
Points of view vary. As others already said, /etc and
On 1/8/2009, Ed W (li...@wildgooses.com) wrote:
I personally suspect Thunderbird, but it's possible that it is related
to Dovecot
I have also seen TBird have a corrupt local cache of the file... it
seems to usually happen to people who I know are the 'impatient' type,
and will click on a
Hi everyone,
New to the list, and fairly confident that this issue is purely down to my
own idiocy, so please go easy on me!
I've been running Dovecot 1.0.13 on Debian (via Aptitude package) for some
time, and have been delighted with it. For a while I've toyed with the
idea of using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009, Michael Dunne wrote:
has this happened to anyone else?
Yes. The PDFs in question were binary PDFs with embedded ^Z. On Windows
this is EOF marker for text files. I suppose that there is some issue
interpreting text/pdf or
ok..i guess i have said it not very precisely. Anyway that was not the
important part of the question :).
problem is that sieve filters eg.
header :contains Subject test
{
fileinto INBOX.a;
}
will move mail
deliver(tes...@imap): 2009-01-08 03:59:36 Info:
On Jan 7, 2009, at 9:34 PM, Matt Doran wrote:
Dovecot sieve will do exactly what you are looking for. It's
described
quite well in the WIKI. The operator that you're looking for is,
'setflag'
We're currently using maildrop for filtering and local delivery.
Do you know if there's a way to
On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 10:57:50 +, Rodti MacLeary ro...@macleary.com
wrote:
The next step is to compile the ManageSieve 0.10.4 source itself. I've
extracted the tarball and attempted ./configure, but it's failing with
the
following errors:
./configure: line 19826: cd: ../dovecot: No
Hello Timo!
Looks like the performance problems on opening/delivering mbox mailboxes
and index updates/usage have been solved with dovecot 1.1.8 (your inbox
subject was dovecot 1.1rc7 and cache with deliver).
http://www.mail-archive.com/dovecot@dovecot.org/msg08274.html
Is this quite
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 13:09 +0100, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
Looks like the performance problems on opening/delivering mbox mailboxes
and index updates/usage have been solved with dovecot 1.1.8 (your inbox
subject was dovecot 1.1rc7 and cache with deliver).
What I meant was that it should be possible for you to not use the
INBOX. namespace prefix at all with Dovecot. Then this Sieve problem
is gone.
Other than that, there's really no other solution except to upgrade to
v1.1.
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 11:58 +0100, Radim Roska wrote:
ok..i guess i have
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 03:45:28PM -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.8.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.8.tar.gz.sig
Most importantly mbox bugfixes. v1.1 should finally be as stable with
mboxes as it was with v1.0. Hopefully we'll also
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 11:00 -0500, Dean Brooks wrote:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 03:45:28PM -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.8.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.8.tar.gz.sig
Most importantly mbox bugfixes. v1.1 should finally be as
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 11:15:55AM -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 11:00 -0500, Dean Brooks wrote:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 03:45:28PM -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.8.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.8.tar.gz.sig
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 11:38 -0500, Dean Brooks wrote:
I found similar code implementing unsetenv() in a perl module that
seems to do the same thing. Completely untested, but example follows.
Hmm. Maybe I could add that to compat.c..
void env_remove(const char *name)
{
int name_len;
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 11:45 -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 11:38 -0500, Dean Brooks wrote:
I found similar code implementing unsetenv() in a perl module that
seems to do the same thing. Completely untested, but example follows.
Hmm. Maybe I could add that to compat.c..
This bug is finally fixed:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/e76f93b48187
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 13:55 +, Guy wrote:
Hi,
I've just started trying allow_nets on one of my servers. I have
auth_debug and auth_verbose both enabled and the output is as follows:
Oct 28 13:05:48 mink
On Jan 8 2009, Dean Brooks wrote:
I found similar code implementing unsetenv() in a perl module that
seems to do the same thing. Completely untested, but example follows.
void env_remove(const char *name)
{
int name_len;
extern char **environ;
char **envp;
name_len =
On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 10:28 -0600, J Springer wrote:
It shows in config.log why exactly it thought they were working.
Copypaste those parts of it?
configure:23169: checking for strtoimax
configure:23196: cc -c -g conftest.c 5
configure:23202: $? = 0
configure:23213: result: yes
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI edua...@kalinowski.com.br wrote:
Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
How to call deliver program to be sure it will *NEVER* generate bounce
messages? [all signalling via deliver exit code ]
According to the Wiki (http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA), that would be the
-e option.
Where can I find step by step procedure to debug sieve scripts?
[ something pretty simple that should work, does not work ]
--
[plen: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : a...@onet.eu : a...@xl.wp.pl
Sex dumps core
(Sex is a Simple editor for X11)
-- Seen on debian bugtracking
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 11:40 +, Rodti MacLeary wrote:
Unfortunately I now get a series of 'nothing to be done' errors when I
attempt to make ManageSieve!
Nothing to be done sounds like everything is successfully compiled.
What exactly are you doing / what's it saying?
signature.asc
Following up.
You checked in slightly different versions of patches 1, 3 and 4 and
released them with 1.1.8. We will test your solutions for these and
adopt them if they work. Thanks!
For all the changes you checked into 1.1 on our behalf, will they also
be included in 1.2?
Following up.
You checked in a slightly different version of patch 6 and released it
with 1.1.8. We will test your solution for this and adopt it if it
works.
We will update our code to honor both the idle timeout and the auth
failure delay, to avoid the DoS situation you described,
I just tried installing dovecot 1.1.8 as an upgrade to 1.1.7 and
encountered Panics like the following with pop3 accesses
Jan 8 10:55:31 sbh16 dovecot: Killed with signal 15
Jan 8 10:55:49 sbh16 dovecot: Dovecot v1.1.8 starting up
Jan 8 10:57:01 sbh16 dovecot: pop3-login: Login: user=user2,
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 11:21 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Jan 8 10:57:01 sbh16 dovecot: Panic: POP3(user2): file
mbox-transaction.c: line 54 (mbox_transaction_commit): assertion
failed: (mbox-ibox.box.transaction_count 0 || mbox-mbox_lock_type
== F_UNLCK)
Fixed:
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 13:15 -0600, Mike Abbott wrote:
For all the changes you checked into 1.1 on our behalf, will they also
be included in 1.2?
Yes, everything that's in v1.1 is (or should be) always in v1.2.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, 2008-12-26 at 11:10 +0100, Jörg Leis wrote:
I tried using a user_field = user additionally as is written here:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/Expire. (Incidentally, there must be
some mismatch in the documentation because the tables for v1.1 do not
contain a field username). Of
On Fri, 2008-12-26 at 14:12 +0100, Jakob Grießmann wrote:
Hi Timo,
With v1.2 it's less ugly with virtual mailboxes.
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/Virtual
But it doesn't sound like such a good idea to actually use. That just allows
the POP3 client to easily download+delete all
ok..thx
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
What I meant was that it should be possible for you to not use the
INBOX. namespace prefix at all with Dovecot. Then this Sieve problem
is gone.
Other than that, there's really no other solution except to upgrade to
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 22:27 -0800, JANE CUA wrote:
drwxrwxr-x 3 root mail 12288 Jan 5 14:31 mail
It works now.
Will I have a security issue here? Please advice..
No. This is the way /var/mail permissions are usually set up.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 14:33 +0100, Tom Sommer wrote:
Sorry to bump this, but I can still reproduce it - I have enabled
auth_debug now to attempt to provide some more details.
Actually enable auth_debug_passwords=yes. It then also logs what's seen
in the cache entries.
signature.asc
We have a user who deleted IMAP folders from his account, so I simply
tried to restore the folder .FolderName from our backup. I checked
that file/folder ownership was the same as the original, but the Dovecot
IMAP server is throwing errors at the client.
I've tried copying the individual
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 11:21 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Jan 8 10:57:01 sbh16 dovecot: Panic: POP3(user2): file
mbox-transaction.c: line 54 (mbox_transaction_commit): assertion
failed: (mbox-ibox.box.transaction_count 0 || mbox-mbox_lock_type
=3D=3D F_UNLCK)
Fixed:
On Wed, 2008-12-24 at 16:26 +0200, Thanos Chatziathanassiou wrote:
``Dec 24 15:36:29 mail dovecot: POP3(u...@domain):
stat(/var/run/dovecot/imap-index/domain/user/.imap/INBOX) failed:
Permission denied (euid=60107 egid=231 missing +x perm:
/var/run/dovecot/imap-index/domain)''
errors.
On Wed, 2008-12-24 at 16:25 +0100, Frank Elsner wrote:
Happy Xmas,
when using a post-login procedure the verbose_proctitle = yes has no effect.
If it is feature
then
please explain
else
please fix the bug
fi
I suppose you mean you modified mail_executable to point to your
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 15:36 -0500, Thomas Harold wrote:
We have a user who deleted IMAP folders from his account, so I simply
tried to restore the folder .FolderName from our backup. I checked
that file/folder ownership was the same as the original, but the Dovecot
IMAP server is throwing
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 15:36 -0500, Thomas Harold wrote:
We have a user who deleted IMAP folders from his account, so I simply
tried to restore the folder .FolderName from our backup. I checked
that file/folder ownership was the same as the original, but the Dovecot
IMAP
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 16:35 -0500, Thomas Harold wrote:
What was it logging? I think it should have clearly said there about
permission errors.
Oh, all sorts of errors in /var/log/messages:
Jan 8 14:48:59 fvs-pri setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing access to
files with the label,
On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 14:50 -0800, Javier Fox wrote:
I'm running Dovecot as an LDA and SASL auth for Postfix on a Debian 4
box. Dovecot is version 1.0.rc15 (the official debian pkg version).
..
deliver(u...@domain.com): Dec 23 14:38:47 Error: User request from
dovecot-auth timed out
..
Now,
On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 14:23 +, Mark Zealey wrote:
Dec 23 14:02:15 mail9 dovecot: pipe() failed: Too many open files
dovecot master process has opened too many files.
The ulimit for the number of open files on these servers has remained
unchanged at 8192
Should be enough..
and there
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 16:35 -0500, Thomas Harold wrote:
What was it logging? I think it should have clearly said there about
permission errors.
Oh, all sorts of errors in /var/log/messages:
Jan 8 14:48:59 fvs-pri setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing access to
files
Thank you, my setup seems to be working properly now. - Jane
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 22:27 -0800, JANE CUA wrote:
drwxrwxr-x 3 root mail 12288 Jan
5 14:31 mail
It works now.
Will I have a security issue here? Please advice..
No. This is the way /var/mail permissions are usually
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.8.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.8.tar.gz.sig
I refreshed the ManageSieve patch:
http://www.rename-it.nl/dovecot/1.1/dovecot-1.1.8-managesieve-0.10.4.diff.gz
Because I'm tired of seeing Debian users look like idiots for using such
horribly out of date versions just because they run stable, I've set
up a page with .deb packages of my 1.1.x rebuilds for use under lenny.
http://www.rollernet.us/opensource/
Standard disclaimer applies: use at your own
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
Seth Mattinen wrote:
Because I'm tired of seeing Debian users look like idiots for using such
horribly out of date versions just because they run stable, I've set
up a page with .deb packages of my 1.1.x rebuilds for use under lenny.
If you really mean 'lenny',
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
Seth Mattinen wrote:
Because I'm tired of seeing Debian users look like idiots for using such
horribly out of date versions just because they run stable, I've set
up a page with .deb packages of my 1.1.x rebuilds for use under lenny.
If you really mean 'lenny',
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 17:02 -0500, Thomas Harold wrote:
My first inclination was to look at the dovecot-deliver.log file (per
log_path or info_log_path). It wasn't until I went looking for SELinux
errors that I discovered that it was a labeling problem.
That's what I meant, did
Seth Mattinen wrote:
Because I'm tired of seeing Debian users look like idiots for using such
horribly out of date versions just because they run stable, I've set
up a page with .deb packages of my 1.1.x rebuilds for use under lenny.
http://www.rollernet.us/opensource/
Sorry I'm retarded;
On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 23:40 -0600, Joe Clark wrote:
auth default:
passdb:
driver: pam
userdb:
driver: passwd
The problem I'm noticing is that if I do top -d 1 while clicking links
in Squirrelmail (e.g., logging in, the Inbox link, opening a message), I
see that a
Sorry if this is a dumb question:
I migrated my third system from courier to dovecot. My previous two
were MacOSX the third is FreeBSD 6.
I noticed (because of an rsync process taking longer than usual...)
that on FreeBSD the message files have, most of them at least, gained
extra suffix
Timo Sirainen wrote:
They get logged to syslog, which probably goes to mail.log or something
like that.
Got it, buried in among the postfix log information in our maillog.
Jan 8 14:48:36 fvs-pri dovecot: IMAP(fr...@nybeta.com):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 2009-01-08 18:29, Charles Marcus wrote:
| On 1/8/2009, Ed W (li...@wildgooses.com) wrote:
| I personally suspect Thunderbird, but it's possible that it is related
| to Dovecot
|
| I have also seen TBird have a corrupt local cache of the
Patrick Nagel wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 2009-01-08 18:29, Charles Marcus wrote:
| On 1/8/2009, Ed W (li...@wildgooses.com) wrote:
| I personally suspect Thunderbird, but it's possible that it is related
| to Dovecot
|
| I have also seen TBird have a corrupt
56 matches
Mail list logo
