Re: [Dovecot] mailbox count folders issues

2009-11-20 Thread Nikita Koshikov
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:53:19 -0500 Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote: On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 18:31 -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote: On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 09:10 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote: Nov 19 08:57:34 IMAP(al...@domain.com): Warning: header rewrite: size=32824 Nov 19 08:57:34

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot and SATA Backend

2009-11-20 Thread alex handle
Extra question, what is the better : iSCSI SATA backend or NFS share ? NFS share is more convenient to have a failover server. Everyone wants to use nfs for mailstorage, because it is convenient, but nfs is the wrong storage model for mail. NFS shines on big files but metadata performance is

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot and SATA Backend

2009-11-20 Thread Robert Schetterer
alex handle schrieb: Extra question, what is the better : iSCSI SATA backend or NFS share ? NFS share is more convenient to have a failover server. Everyone wants to use nfs for mailstorage, because it is convenient, but nfs is the wrong storage model for mail. NFS shines on big files but

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot and SATA Backend

2009-11-20 Thread Nicolas KOWALSKI
Robert Schetterer rob...@schetterer.org writes: sorry for the stupid question what is DAS do you have a link etc for it, to get more info See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct-attached_storage -- Nicolas

Re: [Dovecot] quota is not ignoring trash

2009-11-20 Thread Steffen Kaiser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, JC wrote: I have debian lenny configured with postfix 2.5.5 and dovecot 1.0.15 with mysql, every user has a different quota. The problem is that the quota is not ignoring trash folder, how can I solve this problem? And another

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot and SATA Backend

2009-11-20 Thread Joseba Torre
El Viernes 20 Noviembre 2009 a las 13:05, alex handle escribió: to put it simply: local storage We use Dell R710 in pair, each with 6 15K SAS Disks and RAID 10 - iSCSI or NFS can hardly be faster But faster is not always the way to measure things. In this topic, I think that raw disk

Re: [Dovecot] v1.2.8 released

2009-11-20 Thread Frank Cusack
On November 19, 2009 7:45:05 PM -0500 Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote: http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.8.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.8.tar.gz.sig This is mainly to fix the 0777 base_dir creation issue, which could be considered a security hole, exploitable by

Re: [Dovecot] v1.2.8 released

2009-11-20 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Nov 20, 2009, at 9:06 AM, Frank Cusack wrote: On November 19, 2009 7:45:05 PM -0500 Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote: http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.8.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.8.tar.gz.sig This is mainly to fix the 0777 base_dir creation issue, which

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot and SATA Backend

2009-11-20 Thread alex handle
But faster is not always the way to measure things. In this topic, I think that raw disk access speed is not a critical value; I've tested our setup with maildir on NFS and performance is close enough to local disks. Given this, I prefer the extra features our NAS/SAN setup gives us, like

[Dovecot] [OT] preferred clients

2009-11-20 Thread Jonathan
I'm getting tired of Thunderbird telling me I have unread messages in folders that haven't gotten new messages for months so I'm looking for a new mail client. I know the problem lies with Thunderbird because everything is fine via RoundCube and if it tell Thunderbird to rebuild it's index it

Re: [Dovecot] [OT] preferred clients

2009-11-20 Thread Marcus Rueckert
screen+mutt -- openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux openSUSE is good for you www.opensuse.org

Re: [Dovecot] [OT] preferred clients

2009-11-20 Thread Nicolas KOWALSKI
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Jonathan wrote: So what IMAP clients do people prefer these days? Preferably windows or cross platform and it needs to have decent key bindings because (probably like many of you) I get 100s of emails a day via lists and anything that speeds my way through them is good.

Re: [Dovecot] [OT] preferred clients

2009-11-20 Thread John Gateley
Jonathan wrote: So what IMAP clients do people prefer these days? Preferably windows or cross platform and it needs to have decent key bindings... Have you tried the new Thunderbird 3 beta? There was a thread on this list recently about it. It has a lot of IMAP improvements. Sylpheed has a

Re: [Dovecot] [OT] preferred clients

2009-11-20 Thread Tassilo Horn
Jonathan jonat...@kc8onw.net writes: Hi Jonathan! So what IMAP clients do people prefer these days? I use Gnus [1], the version that is included in Emacs 23. Preferably windows or cross platform and it needs to have decent key bindings because (probably like many of you) I get 100s of

Re: [Dovecot] [OT] preferred clients

2009-11-20 Thread Jonathan
On 11/20/2009 1:27 PM, John Gateley wrote: Jonathan wrote: So what IMAP clients do people prefer these days? Preferably windows or cross platform and it needs to have decent key bindings... Have you tried the new Thunderbird 3 beta? There was a thread on this list recently about it. It has a

Re: [Dovecot] [OT] preferred clients

2009-11-20 Thread Charles Marcus
On 11/20/2009 12:59 PM, Jonathan wrote: I'm getting tired of Thunderbird telling me I have unread messages in folders that haven't gotten new messages for months so I'm looking for a new mail client. I know the problem lies with Thunderbird because everything is fine via RoundCube and if it

Re: [Dovecot] [OT] preferred clients

2009-11-20 Thread Thomas Berezansky
Personally, I am using Horde (http://www.horde.org/) at work (this address) and Outlook 2007 at home (largely due to getting freaky attachments I need to open on a regular basis that only Microsoft mail clients seem to be able to open properly). Horde is a webmail client, and works well in

Re: [Dovecot] mailbox count folders issues

2009-11-20 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 10:23 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote: Nov 20 10:16:00 IMAP(al...@domain.com): Panic: file mail-transaction-log-append.c: line 31 (log_append_buffer): assertion failed: ((type MAIL_TRANSACTION_) Oh, missed that one: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/fa8a438c64ce

Re: [Dovecot] [OT] preferred clients

2009-11-20 Thread Charles Sprickman
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, John Gateley wrote: Jonathan wrote: So what IMAP clients do people prefer these days? Preferably windows or cross platform and it needs to have decent key bindings... Have you tried the new Thunderbird 3 beta? There was a thread on this list recently about it. It has a

Re: [Dovecot] [OT] preferred clients

2009-11-20 Thread Charles Marcus
On 11/20/2009, Thomas Berezansky (tsb...@mvlc.org) wrote: and Outlook 2007 at home (largely due to getting freaky attachments I need to open on a regular basis that only Microsoft mail clients seem to be able to open properly). If you're talking about winmail.dat files, I found a very

Re: [Dovecot] [OT] preferred clients

2009-11-20 Thread Charles Marcus
On 11/20/2009, Charles Sprickman (sp...@bway.net) wrote: It is very good compared to TB2. However, the exact problem the OP described still exists in 3.0b4. I've had the folks I setup with TB3 bugging the hell out of me about the all of a sudden a bunch of messages are marked new issue.

Re: [Dovecot] [OT] preferred clients

2009-11-20 Thread Charles Marcus
On 11/20/2009, Charles Marcus (cmar...@media-brokers.com) wrote: What IMAP server? heh... dumb question, huh... dovecot -n output?

Re: [Dovecot] [OT] preferred clients

2009-11-20 Thread Charles Sprickman
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Charles Marcus wrote: On 11/20/2009, Charles Sprickman (sp...@bway.net) wrote: It is very good compared to TB2. However, the exact problem the OP described still exists in 3.0b4. I've had the folks I setup with TB3 bugging the hell out of me about the all of a sudden a

Re: [Dovecot] [OT] preferred clients

2009-11-20 Thread Charles Marcus
On 11/20/2009, Charles Sprickman (sp...@bway.net) wrote: We're talking about a mailbox with two or more users always in it and around 40K messages across a few hundred folders. The scale of it all seems to be part of the issue I think. Ok, last question then I'll shut up... ;) Have you tried

[Dovecot] Plugin Compatibility

2009-11-20 Thread Tony Rutherford
We are looking to develop a plugin against the 1.2.X line (8 as of right now).  Seeing that v2.0 is not too far off, is there any reason to think that a plugin developed for 1.2.X would NOT be compatible with the 2.0 line?Thanks,Tony This message is intended solely for the individual(s) to

[Dovecot] Problem compiling dovecot 1.2.8 on Solaris 10?

2009-11-20 Thread Drew Schatt
I've got an issue using Sun's compilers on Solaris 10 - it appears that dovecot is trying to use the getopt function, that's part of GNU's glibc, and, therefore, not present when using Sun's compilers. Any ideas on how to resolve? cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../src/lib

Re: [Dovecot] Problem compiling dovecot 1.2.8 on Solaris 10?

2009-11-20 Thread Dave McGuire
On Nov 20, 2009, at 2:40 PM, Drew Schatt wrote: I've got an issue using Sun's compilers on Solaris 10 - it appears that dovecot is trying to use the getopt function, that's part of GNU's glibc, and, therefore, not present when using Sun's compilers. Any ideas on how to resolve? cc

Re: [Dovecot] Plugin Compatibility

2009-11-20 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Nov 20, 2009, at 2:28 PM, Tony Rutherford wrote: We are looking to develop a plugin against the 1.2.X line (8 as of right now). Seeing that v2.0 is not too far off, is there any reason to think that a plugin developed for 1.2.X would NOT be compatible with the 2.0 line? There are some

Re: [Dovecot] [OT] preferred clients

2009-11-20 Thread Jerry
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:38:43 -0500 Jonathan Jonathan jonat...@kc8onw.net replied: [snip] I'm giving Claws Mail, a fork of Sylpheed apparently, a try. Haven't found a way to change key bindings yet and SHIFT-! is really awkward for marking a message unread. MESSAGE MARK Place cursor over

Re: [Dovecot] Problem compiling dovecot 1.2.8 on Solaris 10?

2009-11-20 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Nov 20, 2009, at 2:40 PM, Drew Schatt wrote: cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../src/lib -I../../src/lib-auth -I../../src/lib-mail -I../../src/lib-imap -I../../src/lib-index -I../../src/lib-storage/index/maildir -I../../src/auth -DPKG_RUNDIR=\/usr/local/var/run/dovecot\

Re: [Dovecot] [OT] preferred clients

2009-11-20 Thread David Jonas
On 11/20/09 , Nov 20, 11:13 AM, Charles Marcus wrote: On 11/20/2009, Charles Sprickman (sp...@bway.net) wrote: It is very good compared to TB2. However, the exact problem the OP described still exists in 3.0b4. I've had the folks I setup with TB3 bugging the hell out of me about the all

[Dovecot] quota in SQL and static userdb

2009-11-20 Thread Lampa
Hello, which solution will be working or will be working better (performance). Using dovecot 1.2.6 (plugin section contains quota_rule = *:storage=500M:messages=1 and i need override this default quota for some users) A) passdb sql(SELECT userid AS user, pw AS password, quota AS

[Dovecot] NONEXISTENT status code

2009-11-20 Thread Michael M. Slusarz
I'm going to take exception to the way dovecot (1.2.8) is returning the NONEXISTENT response code in certain cases. For example, these transactions: c: 1 EXAMINE foo S: 1 NO [NONEXISTENT] Mailbox doesn't exist: foo C: 2 STATUS foo (MESSAGES) S: 2 NO [NONEXISTENT] Mailbox doesn't exist: foo

Re: [Dovecot] NONEXISTENT status code

2009-11-20 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 15:43 -0700, Michael M. Slusarz wrote: From RFC 5530[3]: NONEXISTENT The operation attempts to delete something that does not exist. NONEXISTENT should be used for RENAME or DELETE (also the UID EXPUNGE) commands. Well, that sucks.. I'll ask Arnt if he

[Dovecot] mbox sync: UID inserted in the middle of mailbox

2009-11-20 Thread Ivan S
Hi All, Our webmail having an issue with the harddrive so I build new webmail on other machine (using Squirrelmail+dovecot+postfix). After copy all data/home folder from the backup, when this user want to access his Sent item, nothing's in it. I've checked the log and found the message as

Re: [Dovecot] Problem compiling dovecot 1.2.8 on Solaris 10?

2009-11-20 Thread Drew Schatt
On Nov 20, 2009, at 12:17 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On Nov 20, 2009, at 2:40 PM, Drew Schatt wrote: cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../src/lib -I../../src/lib-auth -I../../src/lib-mail -I../../src/lib-imap -I../../src/lib-index -I../../src/lib-storage/index/maildir -I../../src/auth