Re: [Dovecot] BEWARE: you might be supporting the lists owner!!

2012-05-18 Thread Noel Butler
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 20:32 -0700, Linda Walsh wrote: Jeff Kletsky wrote: Even with good intent the message in question is clearly in violation of CAN-SPAM and Cal. Bus. Prof. Code Sec. 17529, of which the sender was informed of when my server was accessed. --- And you have proof

Re: [Dovecot] BEWARE: you might be supporting the lists owner!!

2012-05-18 Thread Noel Butler
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 11:35 +0700, Tamsy wrote: All that noise because of one mail offering some paid support is so one mail multiplies by all the miscreants in the world adds up to a bucket load of crap unnecessary! Actually, it has merits, because it is spam, had it gone to users@ or

Re: [Dovecot] BEWARE: This list is being harvested for leads

2012-05-18 Thread Robert Schetterer
Am 17.05.2012 16:20, schrieb Timo Sirainen: On 17.5.2012, at 16.46, Charles Marcus wrote: On 2012-05-17 9:38 AM, Bill Cole dovecot-20110...@billmail.scconsult.com wrote: A spammer claiming to be 'Tim Saarela tim.saar...@dovecot.fi' is sending out a pitch for Enterprise Level Support for

Re: [Dovecot] Only method=PLAIN

2012-05-18 Thread Manuel Fernández Panzuela
Then, which is the correct configuration ? Are my config files ok ? Openldap stores passwords encrypted with sha algorithm Sendmail could be the problem? Sendmail works with PAM authentication /etc/pam.d/smtp to work with LDAP too. When I connect outlook with (Sendmail + Dovecot) password is

Re: [Dovecot] BEWARE: This list is being harvested for leads

2012-05-18 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2012-05-17 7:02 PM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote: Consider this saga a learning experience, but don't fret over it, and certainly don't lose any sleep over it. It's not 'that' big a deal. We all still adore you for this fantastic mail server you've so graciously provided us.

Re: [Dovecot] BEWARE: you might be supporting the lists owner!!

2012-05-18 Thread Jerry
On Fri, 18 May 2012 16:01:42 +1000 Noel Butler articulated: Doesn't matter, those acts are only effective against people from your own country or those who use services based in that country, they do not and can not apply to anyone else (despite what the U.S. Govt likes to think) Absolutely

Re: [Dovecot] BEWARE: you might be supporting the lists owner!!

2012-05-18 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2012-05-18 6:48 AM, Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote: Absolutely incredible -- I have counted 35 posts in response to what is basically a non-event. It must have been a really slow news day. Yeah - I'm inclined to classify *all* of the complaints about said non-event as *spam*, since none

[Dovecot] Public maiboxes

2012-05-18 Thread bonnetf
hello I'm trying to setup a server with public mailboxes only but I cannot succeed. Anyone could help me a bit ? thank you here is the doveconf -n output # 2.1.6: /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: FreeBSD 7.4-RELEASE-p3 amd64 auth_debug = yes debug_log_path =

[Dovecot] Public mailboxes

2012-05-18 Thread Frank Bonnet
hello I'm trying to setup a server with public mailboxes only but I cannot succeed. Anyone could help me a bit ? thank you here is the doveconf -n output # 2.1.6: /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: FreeBSD 7.4-RELEASE-p3 amd64 auth_debug = yes debug_log_path =

Re: [Dovecot] High level of pop3 popping causing server to become unresponsive

2012-05-18 Thread Root Kev
During the last time that the load went up, it became unable to login / su to root for the entire period that dovecot was running, we had to kill dovecot and go back to Popa3d until the mailq was cleared up. We are running CentOS 5.6 server. Based on TOP running at the time the CPU usage was

Re: [Dovecot] TLS X.509 CRLs

2012-05-18 Thread Matthias-Christian Ott
On Mon, 14 May 2012 18:37:37 +0300, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote: On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 18:43 +0200, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote: according to the documentation file referenced by ssl_ca must contain the Client certificate CA and the corresponding CRL. Thus dovecot would have to

[Dovecot] Override old e-mails with new e-mails after exceeding Maildir size limit

2012-05-18 Thread Dunkan
Hi, Is it possible to set Dovecot to write new e-mails in the place of the oldest e-mails, when there is no storage left in the Maildir? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Override-old-e-mails-with-new-e-mails-after-exceeding-Maildir-size-limit-tp33871372p33871372.html

Re: [Dovecot] Getting Postfix Admin's DB to work with Postfix's/Dovecot's MySQL DB

2012-05-18 Thread Chris Cappuccio
Antoine Nguyen [ngu.anto...@gmail.com] wrote: You can take a look at Modoboa (http://modoboa.org/). It includes a web user interface to create users and a simple webmail. We just installed vimbadmin and are quite happy with it (although removed some annoying crap from the footer) It's

Re: [Dovecot] Override old e-mails with new e-mails after exceeding Maildir size limit

2012-05-18 Thread Daniel Parthey
Dunkan wrote: Is it possible to set Dovecot to write new e-mails in the place of the oldest e-mails, when there is no storage left in the Maildir? I suppose you're looking for the Quota and Trash Plugins? http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Quota http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/Trash Regards Daniel

Re: [Dovecot] High level of pop3 popping causing server to become unresponsive

2012-05-18 Thread Kelsey Cummings
On 5/18/2012 6:21 AM, Root Kev wrote: During the last time that the load went up, it became unable to login / su to root for the entire period that dovecot was running, we had to kill This sounds more like you are getting I/O bound or swapping heavily. What does iostat -x, etc, show when this

[Dovecot] Best way to change index location on mdbox

2012-05-18 Thread Patrick Westenberg
Hi, right now my index directory is part of the users home directory: mail_home = /var/mail/%d/%n mail_location = mdbox:~/mdbox I want the indexes to be stored in a different location: mail_home = /var/mail/%d/%n mail_location = mdbox:~/mdbox:INDEX=/var/indexes/%d/%n If I just switch this

Re: [Dovecot] BEWARE: you might be supporting the lists owner!!

2012-05-18 Thread Noel Butler
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 06:48 -0400, Jerry wrote: basically a non-event. It must have been a really slow news day. non-event? You wouldnt be saying that if certain other operators with their products did that. I've seen you bitch and whinge about far far far less over the years Jerry.

Re: [Dovecot] BEWARE: you might be supporting the lists owner!!

2012-05-18 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
On May 19, 2012 9:36 AM, Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote: On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 06:48 -0400, Jerry wrote: basically a non-event. It must have been a really slow news day. non-event? You wouldnt be saying that if certain other operators with their products did that. I've seen

Re: [Dovecot] BEWARE: you might be supporting the lists owner!!

2012-05-18 Thread Tamsy
Oon-Ee Ng wrote the following on 19.05.2012 08:43: On May 19, 2012 9:36 AM, Noel Butlernoel.but...@ausics.net wrote: On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 06:48 -0400, Jerry wrote: basically a non-event. It must have been a really slow news day. non-event? You wouldnt be saying that if certain other

Re: [Dovecot] BEWARE: you might be supporting the lists owner!!

2012-05-18 Thread Noel Butler
On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 09:43 +0800, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: Almost every commercial product I know off does send unsolicited email. Indeed, its why DNSBL's were developed There's a delete or report spam button/shortcut key for that. If it helps some other users, and more importantly the dovecot