On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 20:32 -0700, Linda Walsh wrote: > Jeff Kletsky wrote: > > Even with "good intent" the message in question is clearly in > > violation of CAN-SPAM and Cal. Bus. Prof. Code Sec. 17529, of which > > the sender was informed of when my server was accessed. > --- > And you have proof of this? That they received notice? I assume > you have > their signature? Computers talking in the night doesn't count as 'proof'. >
Doesn't matter, those acts are only effective against people from your own country or those who use services based in that country, they do not and can not apply to anyone else (despite what the U.S. Govt likes to think)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
