On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 18.8.2012, at 0.12, Lutz Preßler wrote:
inthread refs younger 604800
This works as expected for the first time. But later on, also older
messages/
threads are included until I delete the virtual/.week/dovecot.index*.
[...]
Situation
Hi Timo,
[Timo Sirainen; Di 21 Aug 2012 12:22:04 CEST]
Unfortunatly this can't be a fix because in file_set_size() dovecot
defines an array 'char block[IO_BLOCK_SIZE]'. On the other hand the
default block size is predestined for file ops.
Does the attached patch fix it? (not a very good fix)
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
Is there a reason why 172.16.0.0/12 was left out of the change ^^ ?
Is it actually used? :) I've used 192.168 in my home network and all
corporate networks I've seen have been 10/8. But yeah, I guess since there
aren't
El 23/08/12 22:05, Timo Sirainen escribió:
On 20.8.2012, at 14.47, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
The origin of the problem why lmtp didn't use user's mail_plugin is
that I had it configured it in the pass_attrs option (and read with prefetch)
and not in user_attrs, so lmtp didn't get it.
Hi,
I didn't know where to post this one so I'll start off with you guys and
then try Postfix if I'm barking up the wrong tree!
Having set up my mail server (Dovecot/Postfix), users are experiencing
long delays (a couple of minutes) when sending mail from mail client
such as Thunderbird -
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:10:42 +0200
Warren Baker articulated:
Yeah as others have mentioned - also not sure whether it is worth the
effort to support IPv6's 'private' network (fc00::/7)?
I havent seen anyone making use of this for their v6 enabled sites but
others may have input here.
I would
Am 24.08.2012 12:53, schrieb Tim Smith:
Hi,
I didn't know where to post this one so I'll start off with you guys and
then try Postfix if I'm barking up the wrong tree!
Having set up my mail server (Dovecot/Postfix), users are experiencing
long delays (a couple of minutes) when sending
Thanks Robert. That's what I thought. I couldn't make the connection.
Will try the Postfix list!
On 24/08/12 12:06, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 24.08.2012 12:53, schrieb Tim Smith:
Hi,
I didn't know where to post this one so I'll start off with you guys and
then try Postfix if I'm barking up
On 2012-08-24, at 7.01, Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote:
I would personally recommend supporting it. If history teaches us
anything, it is that sooner or later, and usually sooner, someone will
require that block. Being prepared for it in advance would seem like
the prudent thing to do.
I
Hi all,
Having set up my mail server (Dovecot/Postfix), users are experiencing
long delays (a couple of minutes) when sending mail from mail client
such as Thunderbird - this increases with attachments. Having had a
While in the first place sending e-mail has to do with SMTP and not IMAP,
Am 24.08.2012 13:18, schrieb Matthew Powell:
On 2012-08-24, at 7.01, Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote:
I would personally recommend supporting it. If history teaches us
anything, it is that sooner or later, and usually sooner, someone will
require that block. Being prepared for it in
Am 24.08.2012 13:35, schrieb Jahnke-Zumbusch, Dirk:
Hi all,
Having set up my mail server (Dovecot/Postfix), users are experiencing
long delays (a couple of minutes) when sending mail from mail client
such as Thunderbird - this increases with attachments. Having had a
While in the first
Hi!
I am currently in the process of preparing a migration of our old
Courier-based IMAP/POP server setup to a Dovecot-based one.
During this process I came across the following problem with the
difference Courier and Dovecot handle deleted messages and mail quota.
Quote from
On 8/24/2012 5:53 AM, Tim Smith wrote:
Hay Tim,
Having set up my mail server (Dovecot/Postfix), users are experiencing
long delays (a couple of minutes) when sending mail from mail client
such as Thunderbird - this increases with attachments. Having had a
brief discussion with someone, they
On 24.8.2012, at 15.02, Sven Hartge wrote:
Ignoring the content (or increasing the quota) of the Trash folder is
easy and no problem, but ignoring deleted messages seems impossible
without changes to the code.
..
So I propose an additional flag for the quota_rule config option to be
able to
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 24.8.2012, at 15.02, Sven Hartge wrote:
Ignoring the content (or increasing the quota) of the Trash folder is
easy and no problem, but ignoring deleted messages seems impossible
without changes to the code.
..
So I propose an additional flag for the
Am 24.08.2012 15:13, schrieb Sven Hartge:
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 24.8.2012, at 15.02, Sven Hartge wrote:
Ignoring the content (or increasing the quota) of the Trash folder is
easy and no problem, but ignoring deleted messages seems impossible
without changes to the code.
..
Hello,
We currently use qmail with vpopmail for e-mail and are looking to switch
from courier-imap to dovecot for IMAP on our RedHat EL 5 systems. Our goal
is to use the dovecot RPM supplied by RH (v1.0.7) if at all possible. We
can do this if we are able to dynamically load the vpopmail auth
My next guess was the upstream data rate. My router states that the
upstream is 10x slower than downstream so I guess this is the culprit.
Time to move to a VPS methinks...
On 24/08/12 13:50, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 8/24/2012 5:53 AM, Tim Smith wrote:
Hay Tim,
Having set up my mail server
Robert Schetterer rob...@schetterer.org wrote:
Am 24.08.2012 15:13, schrieb Sven Hartge:
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 24.8.2012, at 15.02, Sven Hartge wrote:
Ignoring the content (or increasing the quota) of the Trash folder is
easy and no problem, but ignoring deleted messages seems
Sven Hartge s...@svenhartge.de wrote:
Robert Schetterer rob...@schetterer.org wrote:
Am 24.08.2012 15:13, schrieb Sven Hartge:
Is is possible to forcibly expunge a message at once, directly after
a client has marked it as deleted? Kind of the opposite of the
lazy_expunge plugin?
hm perhaps
Sven Hartge s...@svenhartge.de wrote:
Nope, does not compile (dovecot-dev headers are installed):
OK, trying to fix this, without having any deeper knowlege of C
(anymore):
deleted-to-trash-plugin.c: In function ‘mailbox_open_or_create’:
deleted-to-trash-plugin.c:79: error:
Hi Timo,
I'm trying to share two folders. The first one it's public and the other is per
user based, using acl's to control access etc . Dovecot create the folders, but
when I'll subscribe using ThunderBird client both of them seens like
watermarked and has a mailboxes folder inside. I can
On 24.8.2012, at 16.13, Sven Hartge wrote:
quota_rule = *:storage=1G:ignoredeleted
quota_rule2 = Trash:storage=+100M
This can't be implemented race-condition-free without huge changes to code.
Damn, too bad.
I know for sure either my users or my 1st level support team are going
to
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 24.8.2012, at 16.13, Sven Hartge wrote:
quota_rule = *:storage=1G:ignoredeleted
quota_rule2 = Trash:storage=+100M
This can't be implemented race-condition-free without huge changes to code.
Damn, too bad.
I know for sure either my users or my 1st
25 matches
Mail list logo
